Cebrail Karaca, Safak Mirioglu, Aydan Mutis Alan, Saadet Usakli, Beyza Nur Aydin Keskin, Mehmet Erdem, Ahmet Murt, Mevlut Tamer Dincer, Nurhan Seyahi, Sinan Trabulus
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间营养方案改变对血液透析充分性和患者健康的影响","authors":"Cebrail Karaca, Safak Mirioglu, Aydan Mutis Alan, Saadet Usakli, Beyza Nur Aydin Keskin, Mehmet Erdem, Ahmet Murt, Mevlut Tamer Dincer, Nurhan Seyahi, Sinan Trabulus","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e946471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Nutritional Protocol Changes on Hemodialysis Adequacy and Patient Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Cebrail Karaca, Safak Mirioglu, Aydan Mutis Alan, Saadet Usakli, Beyza Nur Aydin Keskin, Mehmet Erdem, Ahmet Murt, Mevlut Tamer Dincer, Nurhan Seyahi, Sinan Trabulus\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.946471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e946471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946471\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,许多透析中心实施了严格的喂养限制,以尽量减少患者之间的传播。本研究旨在评估这些喂养限制对血液透析患者干重、分析性低血压(IDH)和透析充分性的影响。材料与方法本回顾性单中心研究纳入76例血液透析患者,对连续2个6个月的数据进行分析:第一组在COVID-19大流行前支持透析营养,第二组在大流行期间限制透析营养。对两期患者每月就诊的数据进行评估,记录平均值,并对两期进行比较。结果采食期IDH发生率显著高于非采食期(1.4±1.2/月vs 0.81±0.86/月,P=0.01)。相反,尿素还原率在不进料期更高[72.5% (69-76)vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01],单池Kt/V值(1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26,P=0.004)和超滤速率(mL/h/kg)(11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2,P=0.01)。但两期患者的干重基本相同(65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62)。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,针对血液透析患者的强制性喂养限制旨在减少传播,与IDH频率的降低和透析充分性的改善有关。然而,没有观察到患者干重的显著减少。
Effects of Nutritional Protocol Changes on Hemodialysis Adequacy and Patient Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.