盘点-波兰药用大麻合法化七年后:用户的观点。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2434683
Greg Los
{"title":"盘点-波兰药用大麻合法化七年后:用户的观点。","authors":"Greg Los","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2434683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been seven years since Poland legalized medical cannabis. Doctors in Poland are allowed to prescribe medical cannabis, which can be then obtained <i>via</i> pharmacies. However, no evaluation has been produced to explore what this policy has achieved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article uses online surveys (<i>N</i> = 571) and qualitative interviews to explore what Polish cannabis users think of the current system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most users - medical and recreational - think that it is currently easy to obtain a prescription for medical cannabis in Poland, and medical cannabis from a pharmacy. The users seem to have a clear preference for cannabis clinics as a source of prescriptions for medical cannabis over traditional doctors. Doctors in cannabis clinics seem much more inclined to prescribe medical cannabis. Many respondents, however, agree that the current system remains too expensive, and many users also raise concerns about the quality of cannabis available from pharmacies and strain variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article shows the emergence of a unique drug policy/model. The access to medical cannabis has improved significantly since the early stages of the policy. Notably - contrary to the wishes of the policymakers who wanted to create a \"strict\" medical model with the use of pharmacies, both - medical and recreational users seem to be benefiting from the current system.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"522-530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Stock - Legalization of Polish Medicinal Cannabis Seven Years Later: Users' Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Greg Los\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2434683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been seven years since Poland legalized medical cannabis. Doctors in Poland are allowed to prescribe medical cannabis, which can be then obtained <i>via</i> pharmacies. However, no evaluation has been produced to explore what this policy has achieved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article uses online surveys (<i>N</i> = 571) and qualitative interviews to explore what Polish cannabis users think of the current system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most users - medical and recreational - think that it is currently easy to obtain a prescription for medical cannabis in Poland, and medical cannabis from a pharmacy. The users seem to have a clear preference for cannabis clinics as a source of prescriptions for medical cannabis over traditional doctors. Doctors in cannabis clinics seem much more inclined to prescribe medical cannabis. Many respondents, however, agree that the current system remains too expensive, and many users also raise concerns about the quality of cannabis available from pharmacies and strain variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article shows the emergence of a unique drug policy/model. The access to medical cannabis has improved significantly since the early stages of the policy. Notably - contrary to the wishes of the policymakers who wanted to create a \\\"strict\\\" medical model with the use of pharmacies, both - medical and recreational users seem to be benefiting from the current system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"522-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2434683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2434683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:波兰医用大麻合法化已有7年。波兰允许医生开医用大麻,然后可以通过药店获得。但是,没有任何评价来探讨这项政策取得了什么成果。方法:本文采用在线调查(N = 571)和定性访谈来探讨波兰大麻使用者对现行制度的看法。结果:大多数医疗和娱乐使用者认为,目前在波兰很容易获得医用大麻的处方,也很容易从药房获得医用大麻。使用者似乎明显倾向于大麻诊所作为医用大麻处方的来源,而不是传统的医生。大麻诊所的医生似乎更倾向于开医用大麻。然而,许多受访者同意,目前的系统仍然过于昂贵,许多用户也对药店提供的大麻质量和品种变化表示担忧。结论:本文显示了一种独特的药物政策/模式的出现。自该政策的早期阶段以来,获得医用大麻的情况有了显著改善。值得注意的是,与政策制定者想要建立一个“严格”的使用药房的医疗模式的愿望相反,医疗和娱乐用户似乎从当前的系统中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking Stock - Legalization of Polish Medicinal Cannabis Seven Years Later: Users' Perspectives.

Background: It has been seven years since Poland legalized medical cannabis. Doctors in Poland are allowed to prescribe medical cannabis, which can be then obtained via pharmacies. However, no evaluation has been produced to explore what this policy has achieved.

Method: This article uses online surveys (N = 571) and qualitative interviews to explore what Polish cannabis users think of the current system.

Results: Most users - medical and recreational - think that it is currently easy to obtain a prescription for medical cannabis in Poland, and medical cannabis from a pharmacy. The users seem to have a clear preference for cannabis clinics as a source of prescriptions for medical cannabis over traditional doctors. Doctors in cannabis clinics seem much more inclined to prescribe medical cannabis. Many respondents, however, agree that the current system remains too expensive, and many users also raise concerns about the quality of cannabis available from pharmacies and strain variation.

Conclusion: This article shows the emergence of a unique drug policy/model. The access to medical cannabis has improved significantly since the early stages of the policy. Notably - contrary to the wishes of the policymakers who wanted to create a "strict" medical model with the use of pharmacies, both - medical and recreational users seem to be benefiting from the current system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信