阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者颈椎本体感觉和生物力学的改变:一项病例对照研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mahbube Doğru, Gamze Yalcinkaya Colak, Yesim Salik Sengul, Ibrahim Oztura, Barıs Baklan
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者颈椎本体感觉和生物力学的改变:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Mahbube Doğru, Gamze Yalcinkaya Colak, Yesim Salik Sengul, Ibrahim Oztura, Barıs Baklan","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03184-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare cervical proprioception and related biomechanical factors among patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and asymptomatic controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-control study, polysomnography scores (apnea-hypopnea index-AHI) were examined to determine the disease severity of the OSA group. Also, we evaluated cervical proprioception by using a laser pointer to detect joint repositioning error sense in cervical rotational movements. Comparison statistics were also conducted for the cervical musculoskeletal variables such as range of motion (ROM) with bubble inclinometer, cranio-cervical (CVA), and thoracic posture (TKA) through photometric analysis, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and pain pressure thresholds of trapezius (PPT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This case-control study included 59 male participants: patients with OSA (n = 29; mean age = 49.10 years; mean BMI = 28.41 kg/m2) and asymptomatic controls (n = 30; mean age = 49.73 years; mean BMI = 26.89 ± 3.60 kg/m2). The mean AHI score was 26.06 events/hour, categorizing the severity of OSA as mild (31.03%), moderate (31.03%), and severe (37.94%). Patients with OSA demonstrated significantly poorer cervical proprioception compared to controls for both sides of cervical rotation with larger effect sizes (d:1.36-1.45; p < 0.05). Also, cervical ROM, CVA, TKA, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and PPT values were altered in the OSA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired cervical proprioception may be a previously unrecognized factor associated with OSA. This finding has implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying cervical musculoskeletal changes in OSA and for developing potential new interventions or exercise designs targeting postural control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered cervical proprioception and biomechanics in obstructive sleep apnea: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Mahbube Doğru, Gamze Yalcinkaya Colak, Yesim Salik Sengul, Ibrahim Oztura, Barıs Baklan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-024-03184-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare cervical proprioception and related biomechanical factors among patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and asymptomatic controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-control study, polysomnography scores (apnea-hypopnea index-AHI) were examined to determine the disease severity of the OSA group. Also, we evaluated cervical proprioception by using a laser pointer to detect joint repositioning error sense in cervical rotational movements. Comparison statistics were also conducted for the cervical musculoskeletal variables such as range of motion (ROM) with bubble inclinometer, cranio-cervical (CVA), and thoracic posture (TKA) through photometric analysis, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and pain pressure thresholds of trapezius (PPT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This case-control study included 59 male participants: patients with OSA (n = 29; mean age = 49.10 years; mean BMI = 28.41 kg/m2) and asymptomatic controls (n = 30; mean age = 49.73 years; mean BMI = 26.89 ± 3.60 kg/m2). The mean AHI score was 26.06 events/hour, categorizing the severity of OSA as mild (31.03%), moderate (31.03%), and severe (37.94%). Patients with OSA demonstrated significantly poorer cervical proprioception compared to controls for both sides of cervical rotation with larger effect sizes (d:1.36-1.45; p < 0.05). Also, cervical ROM, CVA, TKA, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and PPT values were altered in the OSA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired cervical proprioception may be a previously unrecognized factor associated with OSA. This finding has implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying cervical musculoskeletal changes in OSA and for developing potential new interventions or exercise designs targeting postural control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03184-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03184-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者和无症状对照组的颈椎本体感觉及相关生物力学因素。方法:在本病例对照研究中,通过检测多导睡眠图评分(呼吸暂停低通气指数- ahi)来确定OSA组的疾病严重程度。此外,我们通过使用激光笔检测颈椎旋转运动中的关节重新定位错误感来评估颈椎本体感觉。通过光度分析、颈部屈肌耐力测试、斜方肌痛压阈值(PPT),比较统计气泡倾角仪测量的颈椎活动度(ROM)、颅颈(CVA)、胸位(TKA)等颈椎肌肉骨骼变量。结果:本病例对照研究纳入59名男性受试者:OSA患者(n = 29;平均年龄49.10岁;平均BMI = 28.41 kg/m2)和无症状对照组(n = 30;平均年龄49.73岁;平均BMI = 26.89±3.60 kg/m2)。平均AHI评分为26.06事件/小时,OSA的严重程度分为轻度(31.03%)、中度(31.03%)和重度(37.94%)。与对照组相比,OSA患者在颈椎两侧旋转时表现出明显较差的颈椎本体感觉,且效应量较大(d:1.36-1.45;结论:颈椎本体感觉受损可能是先前未被认识到的与OSA相关的因素。这一发现有助于理解阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中颈椎肌肉骨骼变化的机制,并有助于开发针对姿势控制的潜在新干预措施或运动设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altered cervical proprioception and biomechanics in obstructive sleep apnea: a case-control study.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare cervical proprioception and related biomechanical factors among patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and asymptomatic controls.

Methods: In this case-control study, polysomnography scores (apnea-hypopnea index-AHI) were examined to determine the disease severity of the OSA group. Also, we evaluated cervical proprioception by using a laser pointer to detect joint repositioning error sense in cervical rotational movements. Comparison statistics were also conducted for the cervical musculoskeletal variables such as range of motion (ROM) with bubble inclinometer, cranio-cervical (CVA), and thoracic posture (TKA) through photometric analysis, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and pain pressure thresholds of trapezius (PPT).

Results: This case-control study included 59 male participants: patients with OSA (n = 29; mean age = 49.10 years; mean BMI = 28.41 kg/m2) and asymptomatic controls (n = 30; mean age = 49.73 years; mean BMI = 26.89 ± 3.60 kg/m2). The mean AHI score was 26.06 events/hour, categorizing the severity of OSA as mild (31.03%), moderate (31.03%), and severe (37.94%). Patients with OSA demonstrated significantly poorer cervical proprioception compared to controls for both sides of cervical rotation with larger effect sizes (d:1.36-1.45; p < 0.05). Also, cervical ROM, CVA, TKA, neck flexor muscle endurance test, and PPT values were altered in the OSA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Impaired cervical proprioception may be a previously unrecognized factor associated with OSA. This finding has implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying cervical musculoskeletal changes in OSA and for developing potential new interventions or exercise designs targeting postural control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信