Se Youl Kim, Sra Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Kang-Seob Oh, Young-Chul Shin, Dong-Won Shin, Junhyung Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Sun Wook Jung, Kwang-Yeol Lee, Nahyun Oh, Sung Joon Cho, Sang-Won Jeon
{"title":"心理弹性对社区居民创伤后精神症状受害者相关性的调节作用","authors":"Se Youl Kim, Sra Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Kang-Seob Oh, Young-Chul Shin, Dong-Won Shin, Junhyung Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Sun Wook Jung, Kwang-Yeol Lee, Nahyun Oh, Sung Joon Cho, Sang-Won Jeon","doi":"10.30773/pi.2024.0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the psychiatric impact of the Seoul Halloween crowd crush on individuals related to the victims compared to the general population. It also explores the moderating effect of resilience on the relationship between trauma exposure and psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 2,220 participants completed various post-incident questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Hwa-byung symptom scale, post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Resilience Scale) 30 days after the incident. Moderation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro in the statistical package for the social sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals related to the victims exhibited higher symptom severity and a greater risk for clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, anger, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (odds ratio=3.28, 3.33, 1.51, and 4.39 respectively). The impact of relevance to victims on anxiety and PTSD symptoms was moderated by resilience, with a stronger effect observed for individuals with low resilience (β=3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.78-4.24 for anxiety and β=14.53, 95% CI 12.43-16.63 for PTSD) than for those with high resilience (β=1.69, 95% CI 0.72-2.65 for anxiety and β=8.33, 95% CI 5.56-11.09 for PTSD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When related to the victims, it was found that not only PTSD, but also depression, anxiety, and anger could intensify. Resilience emerged as a potential buffer against these adverse effects, emphasizing its significance in mitigating the psychiatric impact of community trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"21 11","pages":"1183-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Moderating Effect of Resilience on the Relationship Between the Relevance to Victims With Post-Trauma Psychiatric Symptoms of Community Residents After Seoul Halloween Crowd Crush.\",\"authors\":\"Se Youl Kim, Sra Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Kang-Seob Oh, Young-Chul Shin, Dong-Won Shin, Junhyung Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Sun Wook Jung, Kwang-Yeol Lee, Nahyun Oh, Sung Joon Cho, Sang-Won Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.30773/pi.2024.0154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the psychiatric impact of the Seoul Halloween crowd crush on individuals related to the victims compared to the general population. It also explores the moderating effect of resilience on the relationship between trauma exposure and psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 2,220 participants completed various post-incident questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Hwa-byung symptom scale, post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Resilience Scale) 30 days after the incident. Moderation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro in the statistical package for the social sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals related to the victims exhibited higher symptom severity and a greater risk for clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, anger, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (odds ratio=3.28, 3.33, 1.51, and 4.39 respectively). The impact of relevance to victims on anxiety and PTSD symptoms was moderated by resilience, with a stronger effect observed for individuals with low resilience (β=3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.78-4.24 for anxiety and β=14.53, 95% CI 12.43-16.63 for PTSD) than for those with high resilience (β=1.69, 95% CI 0.72-2.65 for anxiety and β=8.33, 95% CI 5.56-11.09 for PTSD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When related to the victims, it was found that not only PTSD, but also depression, anxiety, and anger could intensify. Resilience emerged as a potential buffer against these adverse effects, emphasizing its significance in mitigating the psychiatric impact of community trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Investigation\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"1183-1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0154\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在探讨首尔万圣节人群挤压对受害者相关个体的精神影响。它还探讨了心理弹性对创伤暴露与精神症状之间关系的调节作用。方法:2220名参与者在事件发生后30天完成了各种事件后问卷(患者健康问卷-9、广泛性焦虑障碍-7、Hwa-byung症状量表、DSM-5创伤后应激障碍检查表和简短恢复量表)。使用社会科学统计软件包中的PROCESS宏进行适度分析。结果:与受害者相关的个体表现出更高的症状严重程度和更高的临床显著水平的抑郁、焦虑、愤怒和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险(优势比分别为3.28、3.33、1.51和4.39)。与受害者相关对焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状的影响被心理弹性调节,低心理弹性个体(焦虑β=3.51, 95%可信区间[CI] 2.78-4.24, PTSD β=14.53, 95%可信区间[CI] 12.43-16.63)比高心理弹性个体(焦虑β=1.69, 95% CI 0.72-2.65, PTSD β=8.33, 95% CI 5.56-11.09)的影响更强。结论:当与受害者接触时,不仅PTSD会加重,抑郁、焦虑、愤怒也会加重。复原力作为对抗这些不利影响的潜在缓冲而出现,强调了它在减轻社区创伤的精神影响方面的重要性。
The Moderating Effect of Resilience on the Relationship Between the Relevance to Victims With Post-Trauma Psychiatric Symptoms of Community Residents After Seoul Halloween Crowd Crush.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychiatric impact of the Seoul Halloween crowd crush on individuals related to the victims compared to the general population. It also explores the moderating effect of resilience on the relationship between trauma exposure and psychiatric symptoms.
Methods: In total, 2,220 participants completed various post-incident questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Hwa-byung symptom scale, post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5, and Brief Resilience Scale) 30 days after the incident. Moderation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro in the statistical package for the social sciences.
Results: Individuals related to the victims exhibited higher symptom severity and a greater risk for clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, anger, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (odds ratio=3.28, 3.33, 1.51, and 4.39 respectively). The impact of relevance to victims on anxiety and PTSD symptoms was moderated by resilience, with a stronger effect observed for individuals with low resilience (β=3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.78-4.24 for anxiety and β=14.53, 95% CI 12.43-16.63 for PTSD) than for those with high resilience (β=1.69, 95% CI 0.72-2.65 for anxiety and β=8.33, 95% CI 5.56-11.09 for PTSD).
Conclusion: When related to the victims, it was found that not only PTSD, but also depression, anxiety, and anger could intensify. Resilience emerged as a potential buffer against these adverse effects, emphasizing its significance in mitigating the psychiatric impact of community trauma.
期刊介绍:
The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.