脑电图谱分析能区分发作性睡症儿童与特发性嗜睡和主观性嗜睡儿童吗?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Georgina Plunkett, Marisha Shetty, Margot J Davey, Gillian M Nixon, Lisa M Walter, Rosemary S C Horne
{"title":"脑电图谱分析能区分发作性睡症儿童与特发性嗜睡和主观性嗜睡儿童吗?","authors":"Georgina Plunkett, Marisha Shetty, Margot J Davey, Gillian M Nixon, Lisa M Walter, Rosemary S C Horne","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>EEG spectral analysis provides a more sensitive measure of sleep disruption than conventional sleep macro-architecture. We aimed to examine the use of this technique applied to overnight polysomnography in distinguishing children with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) from subjectively sleepy children with a non-diagnostic multiple sleep latency test. The relative power was calculated for delta (0.5-3.9 Hz), theta (4-7.9 Hz), alpha (8-11.9 Hz), sigma (12-13.9 Hz), and beta power (14-30 Hz). A mean value for each frequency was calculated for each 30 s epoch then averaged for each sleep stage within each child. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. Twenty-eight children with narcolepsy, 11 with IH, and 26 with subjective sleepiness were included and individually matched for age and sex with a control child. In N2, the F4 beta power was lower in the narcolepsy compared with the IH group (p < 0.05). The F4 theta power was higher in the narcolepsy compared with the subjectively sleepy group during wake (p < 0.001), N2 (p < 0.01), N3 (p < 0.05), and total sleep (p < 0.01). During total sleep the F4 delta power was lower in both the narcolepsy and IH groups compared with the subjectively sleepy group (p < 0.05 for both). Our study identified specific EEG frequencies which differed between groups of children referred for assessment of EDS. In particular, differences in theta and delta power in children with narcolepsy and IH compared with others with subjective sleepiness may provide insights into the pathophysiology associated these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can EEG spectral analysis distinguish children with narcolepsy from those with idiopathic hypersomnia and subjective sleepiness?\",\"authors\":\"Georgina Plunkett, Marisha Shetty, Margot J Davey, Gillian M Nixon, Lisa M Walter, Rosemary S C Horne\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.14428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>EEG spectral analysis provides a more sensitive measure of sleep disruption than conventional sleep macro-architecture. We aimed to examine the use of this technique applied to overnight polysomnography in distinguishing children with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) from subjectively sleepy children with a non-diagnostic multiple sleep latency test. The relative power was calculated for delta (0.5-3.9 Hz), theta (4-7.9 Hz), alpha (8-11.9 Hz), sigma (12-13.9 Hz), and beta power (14-30 Hz). A mean value for each frequency was calculated for each 30 s epoch then averaged for each sleep stage within each child. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. Twenty-eight children with narcolepsy, 11 with IH, and 26 with subjective sleepiness were included and individually matched for age and sex with a control child. In N2, the F4 beta power was lower in the narcolepsy compared with the IH group (p < 0.05). The F4 theta power was higher in the narcolepsy compared with the subjectively sleepy group during wake (p < 0.001), N2 (p < 0.01), N3 (p < 0.05), and total sleep (p < 0.01). During total sleep the F4 delta power was lower in both the narcolepsy and IH groups compared with the subjectively sleepy group (p < 0.05 for both). Our study identified specific EEG frequencies which differed between groups of children referred for assessment of EDS. In particular, differences in theta and delta power in children with narcolepsy and IH compared with others with subjective sleepiness may provide insights into the pathophysiology associated these conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑电图频谱分析提供了一种比传统睡眠宏观结构更敏感的睡眠中断测量方法。我们的目的是通过非诊断性的多次睡眠潜伏期测试,研究将该技术应用于夜间多导睡眠图,以区分发作性睡病和特发性嗜睡(IH)儿童和主观上困倦的儿童。计算delta (0.5-3.9 Hz)、theta (4-7.9 Hz)、alpha (8-11.9 Hz)、sigma (12-13.9 Hz)和beta (14-30 Hz)的相对功率。计算每个30s epoch的频率平均值,然后对每个儿童的每个睡眠阶段取平均值。数据以中位数和四分位数范围表示。28名发作性睡病儿童、11名IH儿童和26名主观嗜睡儿童被纳入研究,并根据年龄和性别与对照儿童进行了单独匹配。N2组发作性睡症患者F4 β能力较IH组明显降低(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can EEG spectral analysis distinguish children with narcolepsy from those with idiopathic hypersomnia and subjective sleepiness?

EEG spectral analysis provides a more sensitive measure of sleep disruption than conventional sleep macro-architecture. We aimed to examine the use of this technique applied to overnight polysomnography in distinguishing children with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) from subjectively sleepy children with a non-diagnostic multiple sleep latency test. The relative power was calculated for delta (0.5-3.9 Hz), theta (4-7.9 Hz), alpha (8-11.9 Hz), sigma (12-13.9 Hz), and beta power (14-30 Hz). A mean value for each frequency was calculated for each 30 s epoch then averaged for each sleep stage within each child. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. Twenty-eight children with narcolepsy, 11 with IH, and 26 with subjective sleepiness were included and individually matched for age and sex with a control child. In N2, the F4 beta power was lower in the narcolepsy compared with the IH group (p < 0.05). The F4 theta power was higher in the narcolepsy compared with the subjectively sleepy group during wake (p < 0.001), N2 (p < 0.01), N3 (p < 0.05), and total sleep (p < 0.01). During total sleep the F4 delta power was lower in both the narcolepsy and IH groups compared with the subjectively sleepy group (p < 0.05 for both). Our study identified specific EEG frequencies which differed between groups of children referred for assessment of EDS. In particular, differences in theta and delta power in children with narcolepsy and IH compared with others with subjective sleepiness may provide insights into the pathophysiology associated these conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信