Nico Kolokythas, George S Metsios, Shaun M Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A Wyon
{"title":"11+舞蹈对青少年芭蕾舞者生理参数的影响:一项随机对照等效试验。","authors":"Nico Kolokythas, George S Metsios, Shaun M Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A Wyon","doi":"10.1177/1089313X241300567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The use of neuromuscular interventions in sports induce meaningful motor performance in strength, sprint and power. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the \"11+ Dance\" exercise program versus normal training (control) on possible adaptations in power, lower-body strength, and inter-limb asymmetry in adolescent ballet dancers. <b>Study Design:</b> Prospective randomized controlled trial. <b>Methods:</b> Dancers (n = 76) from a pre-professional ballet school volunteered for this study. Data from the two trials (pilot and main trials) were combined to protect the results from possible learning effect of the intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to either the 11+ Dance intervention (n = 38) or Control (n = 38). Participants completed at least 21 sessions over 7-9 weeks. The 11+ Dance intervention consisted of neuromuscular-based exercises, whereas the Control group carried out their normal routine. Baseline and post intervention outcome measures included countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and inter-limb asymmetry (ASYM). <b>Results:</b> Non-statistically significant improvements were noted for both 11+ Dance and control groups across outcome measures; CMJ <i>F</i>(1, 66) = 3.52, <i>P</i> = .065, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .051 (14% vs 8%), RSI <i>F</i>(1, 65) = 1.02, <i>P</i> = .316, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .015 (6% vs 13%), and IMTP <i>F</i>(1, 67) = 1.7, <i>P</i> = .197, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .025 (23% vs 18%). ASYM (<i>F</i>[1, 63] = .109, <i>P</i> = .743, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .002) (24% vs 15%). No statistically significant interaction for adherence was revealed for all the parameters. <b>Conclusion:</b> The 11+ Dance intervention elicited similar physiological adaptations as the Control group. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of the 11+ Dance on injury incidence and severity as current evidence suggests prophylactic programs such as the 11+ Dance have an effect on injury prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X241300567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of 11+ Dance on Physiological Parameters in Adolescent Ballet Dancers: A Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nico Kolokythas, George S Metsios, Shaun M Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A Wyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1089313X241300567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The use of neuromuscular interventions in sports induce meaningful motor performance in strength, sprint and power. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the \\\"11+ Dance\\\" exercise program versus normal training (control) on possible adaptations in power, lower-body strength, and inter-limb asymmetry in adolescent ballet dancers. <b>Study Design:</b> Prospective randomized controlled trial. <b>Methods:</b> Dancers (n = 76) from a pre-professional ballet school volunteered for this study. Data from the two trials (pilot and main trials) were combined to protect the results from possible learning effect of the intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to either the 11+ Dance intervention (n = 38) or Control (n = 38). Participants completed at least 21 sessions over 7-9 weeks. The 11+ Dance intervention consisted of neuromuscular-based exercises, whereas the Control group carried out their normal routine. Baseline and post intervention outcome measures included countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and inter-limb asymmetry (ASYM). <b>Results:</b> Non-statistically significant improvements were noted for both 11+ Dance and control groups across outcome measures; CMJ <i>F</i>(1, 66) = 3.52, <i>P</i> = .065, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .051 (14% vs 8%), RSI <i>F</i>(1, 65) = 1.02, <i>P</i> = .316, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .015 (6% vs 13%), and IMTP <i>F</i>(1, 67) = 1.7, <i>P</i> = .197, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .025 (23% vs 18%). ASYM (<i>F</i>[1, 63] = .109, <i>P</i> = .743, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = .002) (24% vs 15%). No statistically significant interaction for adherence was revealed for all the parameters. <b>Conclusion:</b> The 11+ Dance intervention elicited similar physiological adaptations as the Control group. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of the 11+ Dance on injury incidence and severity as current evidence suggests prophylactic programs such as the 11+ Dance have an effect on injury prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1089313X241300567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X241300567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X241300567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在运动中使用神经肌肉干预可以在力量、冲刺和力量方面产生有意义的运动表现。本研究的目的是调查“11+舞蹈”锻炼计划与正常训练(对照)在青少年芭蕾舞者力量、下半身力量和肢体间不对称方面的可能适应性的有效性。研究设计:前瞻性随机对照试验。方法:来自一所预科芭蕾舞学校的76名舞者自愿参与本研究。两项试验(先导试验和主试验)的数据被合并,以保护结果不受干预可能产生的学习效应的影响。参与者被随机分配到11+舞蹈干预组(n = 38)或对照组(n = 38)。参与者在7-9周内完成了至少21个疗程。11+舞蹈干预包括以神经肌肉为基础的锻炼,而对照组则进行正常的常规训练。基线和干预后的结果测量包括反向运动跳跃(CMJ)、反应性强度指数(RSI)、等距大腿中部牵拉(IMTP)和肢间不对称(ASYM)。结果:在结果测量中,11+舞蹈组和对照组均有非统计学意义的改善;CMJ f (1,66) = 3.52, p =。065, ηp =。051(14% vs 8%), RSI F(1,65) = 1.02, P =。316, ηp2 = 0.015(6% vs 13%), IMTP F(1,67) = 1.7, P =。197, ηp2 = 0.025(23%对18%)。对称(f[1,63] =。109, p =。743, ηp2 = .002) (24% vs 15%)。所有参数在依从性方面没有统计学上显著的相互作用。结论:11+舞蹈干预引起的生理适应与对照组相似。需要更大规模的纵向研究来调查11+舞蹈对伤害发生率和严重程度的影响,因为目前的证据表明,像11+舞蹈这样的预防性项目对伤害预防有影响。
The Effects of 11+ Dance on Physiological Parameters in Adolescent Ballet Dancers: A Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.
Introduction: The use of neuromuscular interventions in sports induce meaningful motor performance in strength, sprint and power. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the "11+ Dance" exercise program versus normal training (control) on possible adaptations in power, lower-body strength, and inter-limb asymmetry in adolescent ballet dancers. Study Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods: Dancers (n = 76) from a pre-professional ballet school volunteered for this study. Data from the two trials (pilot and main trials) were combined to protect the results from possible learning effect of the intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to either the 11+ Dance intervention (n = 38) or Control (n = 38). Participants completed at least 21 sessions over 7-9 weeks. The 11+ Dance intervention consisted of neuromuscular-based exercises, whereas the Control group carried out their normal routine. Baseline and post intervention outcome measures included countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and inter-limb asymmetry (ASYM). Results: Non-statistically significant improvements were noted for both 11+ Dance and control groups across outcome measures; CMJ F(1, 66) = 3.52, P = .065, = .051 (14% vs 8%), RSI F(1, 65) = 1.02, P = .316, = .015 (6% vs 13%), and IMTP F(1, 67) = 1.7, P = .197, = .025 (23% vs 18%). ASYM (F[1, 63] = .109, P = .743, = .002) (24% vs 15%). No statistically significant interaction for adherence was revealed for all the parameters. Conclusion: The 11+ Dance intervention elicited similar physiological adaptations as the Control group. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of the 11+ Dance on injury incidence and severity as current evidence suggests prophylactic programs such as the 11+ Dance have an effect on injury prevention.