利用各种澄清和介质过滤技术的小型和大型再生水厂的病原体验证。

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of water and health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.2166/wh.2024.263
Petra Reeve, Gretchen Marshall, Po Zhang, Ben Thwaites, Ben van den Akker
{"title":"利用各种澄清和介质过滤技术的小型和大型再生水厂的病原体验证。","authors":"Petra Reeve, Gretchen Marshall, Po Zhang, Ben Thwaites, Ben van den Akker","doi":"10.2166/wh.2024.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Media filters are important in wastewater recycling schemes for pathogen removal. Filter selection depends on health targets and plant scale; however, there is a data gap concerning pathogen removal efficacy at full scale. This study compared the pathogen removal performance of two full-scale filtration technologies, including a small 17,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d pressurized media filtration (PMF) plant and a large 120,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d gravity filter in the form of dissolved air flotation filtration (DAFF). The preceding clarification processes were also assessed. Validation of protozoa and virus removal was estimated by dosing model organisms yeast and MS2 bacteriophage to demonstrate removal potential. The DAFF process (coagulation, flotation and filtration) was most efficient at removing bacteriophage with a mean log<sub>10</sub> reduction value (LRV) of 2.90 (±0.64), compared with 0.98 (±0.37) achieved by coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. Yeast log<sub>10</sub> reduction though both systems were similar measuring 3.80 (±1.06) through DAFF and 4.57 (±0.14) through coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. The DAFF process showed greater variability in MS2 and yeast removal, which was attributed to filtration. Energy and chemical usage were also evaluated, revealing trade-offs between these factors, treatment scale and pathogen LRVs, offering practical insights into the technological and economic aspects of designing fit-for-purpose recycled water schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water and health","volume":"22 11","pages":"2132-2145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathogen validation of small- and large-scale recycled water plants utilizing various clarification and media filtration technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Petra Reeve, Gretchen Marshall, Po Zhang, Ben Thwaites, Ben van den Akker\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wh.2024.263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Media filters are important in wastewater recycling schemes for pathogen removal. Filter selection depends on health targets and plant scale; however, there is a data gap concerning pathogen removal efficacy at full scale. This study compared the pathogen removal performance of two full-scale filtration technologies, including a small 17,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d pressurized media filtration (PMF) plant and a large 120,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d gravity filter in the form of dissolved air flotation filtration (DAFF). The preceding clarification processes were also assessed. Validation of protozoa and virus removal was estimated by dosing model organisms yeast and MS2 bacteriophage to demonstrate removal potential. The DAFF process (coagulation, flotation and filtration) was most efficient at removing bacteriophage with a mean log<sub>10</sub> reduction value (LRV) of 2.90 (±0.64), compared with 0.98 (±0.37) achieved by coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. Yeast log<sub>10</sub> reduction though both systems were similar measuring 3.80 (±1.06) through DAFF and 4.57 (±0.14) through coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. The DAFF process showed greater variability in MS2 and yeast removal, which was attributed to filtration. Energy and chemical usage were also evaluated, revealing trade-offs between these factors, treatment scale and pathogen LRVs, offering practical insights into the technological and economic aspects of designing fit-for-purpose recycled water schemes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water and health\",\"volume\":\"22 11\",\"pages\":\"2132-2145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2024.263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water and health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2024.263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介质过滤器是废水回收方案中去除病原体的重要手段。过滤器的选择取决于健康目标和工厂规模;然而,关于全面去除病原体的效果,还存在数据缺口。本研究比较了两种全规模过滤技术的病原去除性能,包括小型17000 m3/d的加压介质过滤(PMF)装置和大型120000 m3/d的溶解气浮选过滤(DAFF)形式的重力过滤器。之前的澄清过程也进行了评估。通过添加模式生物酵母和MS2噬菌体来验证原生动物和病毒的去除潜力。DAFF工艺(混凝、浮选和过滤)去除噬菌体的效率最高,平均log10还原值(LRV)为2.90(±0.64),而混凝、沉淀和PMF工艺的LRV为0.98(±0.37)。两种体系的酵母菌log10降低率相似,通过DAFF测定为3.80(±1.06),通过混凝、沉淀和PMF测定为4.57(±0.14)。DAFF工艺在MS2和酵母去除方面表现出更大的变异性,这归因于过滤。还对能源和化学品的使用进行了评估,揭示了这些因素、处理规模和病原体lrv之间的权衡,为设计适合用途的再生水方案提供了技术和经济方面的实际见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathogen validation of small- and large-scale recycled water plants utilizing various clarification and media filtration technologies.

Media filters are important in wastewater recycling schemes for pathogen removal. Filter selection depends on health targets and plant scale; however, there is a data gap concerning pathogen removal efficacy at full scale. This study compared the pathogen removal performance of two full-scale filtration technologies, including a small 17,000 m3/d pressurized media filtration (PMF) plant and a large 120,000 m3/d gravity filter in the form of dissolved air flotation filtration (DAFF). The preceding clarification processes were also assessed. Validation of protozoa and virus removal was estimated by dosing model organisms yeast and MS2 bacteriophage to demonstrate removal potential. The DAFF process (coagulation, flotation and filtration) was most efficient at removing bacteriophage with a mean log10 reduction value (LRV) of 2.90 (±0.64), compared with 0.98 (±0.37) achieved by coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. Yeast log10 reduction though both systems were similar measuring 3.80 (±1.06) through DAFF and 4.57 (±0.14) through coagulation, sedimentation and PMF. The DAFF process showed greater variability in MS2 and yeast removal, which was attributed to filtration. Energy and chemical usage were also evaluated, revealing trade-offs between these factors, treatment scale and pathogen LRVs, offering practical insights into the technological and economic aspects of designing fit-for-purpose recycled water schemes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water and health
Journal of water and health 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Health is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of information on the health implications and control of waterborne microorganisms and chemical substances in the broadest sense for developing and developed countries worldwide. This is to include microbial toxins, chemical quality and the aesthetic qualities of water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信