Jiahao Meng, Xi Li, Yilin Xiong, Yumei Wu, Pan Liu, Shuguang Gao
{"title":"维生素D在预防和治疗结核病中的作用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiahao Meng, Xi Li, Yilin Xiong, Yumei Wu, Pan Liu, Shuguang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02446-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the role of supplementing vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis infection through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to April 21, 2024, to identify studies comparing vitamin D supplementation with non-vitamin D supplementation for tuberculosis infection prevention or treatment. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving participants diagnosed with either no tuberculosis or tuberculosis, with the intervention group receiving vitamin D supplementation and the control group receiving a placebo or standard treatment, and reporting outcomes related to tuberculosis prevention or treatment effects. The exclusion criteria were studies without full text and those not meeting the specific participant or treatment criteria. The analysis was performed using the Inverse Variance method with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of different administration routes. The stability of the pooled results was assessed using the leave-one-out method. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's and Begg's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 26 eligible trials, involving 19,586 participants. Four trials compared the preventive effects of vitamin D supplementation on tuberculosis infection, and the results (RR 0·75; 95% CI 0·56 to 1·01) were inconclusive. Regarding the role of vitamin D supplementation in anti-tuberculosis treatment, there were no significant statistical differences between the vitamin D and non-vitamin D groups in sputum smear conversion, sputum culture conversion, or time to sputum culture conversion. However, patients in the vitamin D group showed significantly lower Tuberculosis scores at 8 weeks (MD - 0·39; 95% CI -0·57 to -0 22) and 12 weeks (MD - 0·53; 95% CI - 0·84 to - 0·22). There were similar safety profiles between the two groups. Subgroup analysis based on the frequency of vitamin D intake revealed that patients who received daily vitamin D supplementation had higher rates of sputum smear conversion at 6 weeks and 8 weeks. They also had lower TB scores at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supplementing with vitamin D during anti-tuberculosis treatment does not accelerate the clearance of tuberculosis bacteria, but it can improve patient symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Meng, Xi Li, Yilin Xiong, Yumei Wu, Pan Liu, Shuguang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-024-02446-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the role of supplementing vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis infection through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to April 21, 2024, to identify studies comparing vitamin D supplementation with non-vitamin D supplementation for tuberculosis infection prevention or treatment. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving participants diagnosed with either no tuberculosis or tuberculosis, with the intervention group receiving vitamin D supplementation and the control group receiving a placebo or standard treatment, and reporting outcomes related to tuberculosis prevention or treatment effects. The exclusion criteria were studies without full text and those not meeting the specific participant or treatment criteria. The analysis was performed using the Inverse Variance method with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of different administration routes. The stability of the pooled results was assessed using the leave-one-out method. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's and Begg's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 26 eligible trials, involving 19,586 participants. Four trials compared the preventive effects of vitamin D supplementation on tuberculosis infection, and the results (RR 0·75; 95% CI 0·56 to 1·01) were inconclusive. Regarding the role of vitamin D supplementation in anti-tuberculosis treatment, there were no significant statistical differences between the vitamin D and non-vitamin D groups in sputum smear conversion, sputum culture conversion, or time to sputum culture conversion. However, patients in the vitamin D group showed significantly lower Tuberculosis scores at 8 weeks (MD - 0·39; 95% CI -0·57 to -0 22) and 12 weeks (MD - 0·53; 95% CI - 0·84 to - 0·22). There were similar safety profiles between the two groups. Subgroup analysis based on the frequency of vitamin D intake revealed that patients who received daily vitamin D supplementation had higher rates of sputum smear conversion at 6 weeks and 8 weeks. They also had lower TB scores at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supplementing with vitamin D during anti-tuberculosis treatment does not accelerate the clearance of tuberculosis bacteria, but it can improve patient symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1129-1140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02446-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02446-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,探讨补充维生素D在预防和治疗结核病感染中的作用。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science数据库,从数据库成立到2024年4月21日,确定维生素D补充与非维生素D补充对结核病感染预防或治疗的比较研究。纳入标准是随机对照试验,涉及诊断为无结核病或结核病的参与者,干预组接受维生素D补充,对照组接受安慰剂或标准治疗,并报告与结核病预防或治疗效果相关的结果。排除标准是没有全文和不符合特定受试者或治疗标准的研究。采用随机效应模型的反方差法进行分析。采用亚组分析探讨不同给药途径的影响。用留一法评价合并结果的稳定性。用Egger’s和Begg’s检验评估发表偏倚。结果:我们共确定了26项符合条件的试验,涉及19,586名受试者。4项试验比较了补充维生素D对结核病感染的预防作用,结果(RR = 0.75;95% CI(0.56 ~ 1.01)不确定。关于补充维生素D在抗结核治疗中的作用,维生素D组与非维生素D组在痰涂片转化、痰培养转化、痰培养转化时间方面均无显著统计学差异。然而,维生素D组患者在8周时结核病评分显著降低(MD - 0.39;95% CI - 0.57至- 0.22)和12周(MD - 0.53;95% CI - 0.84 ~ - 0.22)。两组之间的安全性相似。基于维生素D摄入频率的亚组分析显示,每天补充维生素D的患者在6周和8周时的痰涂片转化率更高。他们在8周时的结核病评分也较低。结论:在抗结核治疗中补充维生素D不能加速结核菌的清除,但能改善患者症状。
The role of vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Purpose: To explore the role of supplementing vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis infection through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Methods: The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to April 21, 2024, to identify studies comparing vitamin D supplementation with non-vitamin D supplementation for tuberculosis infection prevention or treatment. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving participants diagnosed with either no tuberculosis or tuberculosis, with the intervention group receiving vitamin D supplementation and the control group receiving a placebo or standard treatment, and reporting outcomes related to tuberculosis prevention or treatment effects. The exclusion criteria were studies without full text and those not meeting the specific participant or treatment criteria. The analysis was performed using the Inverse Variance method with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of different administration routes. The stability of the pooled results was assessed using the leave-one-out method. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's and Begg's tests.
Results: We identified a total of 26 eligible trials, involving 19,586 participants. Four trials compared the preventive effects of vitamin D supplementation on tuberculosis infection, and the results (RR 0·75; 95% CI 0·56 to 1·01) were inconclusive. Regarding the role of vitamin D supplementation in anti-tuberculosis treatment, there were no significant statistical differences between the vitamin D and non-vitamin D groups in sputum smear conversion, sputum culture conversion, or time to sputum culture conversion. However, patients in the vitamin D group showed significantly lower Tuberculosis scores at 8 weeks (MD - 0·39; 95% CI -0·57 to -0 22) and 12 weeks (MD - 0·53; 95% CI - 0·84 to - 0·22). There were similar safety profiles between the two groups. Subgroup analysis based on the frequency of vitamin D intake revealed that patients who received daily vitamin D supplementation had higher rates of sputum smear conversion at 6 weeks and 8 weeks. They also had lower TB scores at 8 weeks.
Conclusion: Supplementing with vitamin D during anti-tuberculosis treatment does not accelerate the clearance of tuberculosis bacteria, but it can improve patient symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.