Ekin Atay, Çağatay Ermiş, İrem Nur Gökbayrak Atay, Ömer Aydemir, Erol Özmen
{"title":"主要极性在双相情感障碍患者认知功能障碍中的作用。","authors":"Ekin Atay, Çağatay Ermiş, İrem Nur Gökbayrak Atay, Ömer Aydemir, Erol Özmen","doi":"10.1186/s40345-024-00363-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is frequently observed in bipolar disorder (BD). Previous findings indicated that predominant polarity could have an effect on cognitive deficits. This study aimed to examine the association between predominant polarity and cognitive impairments in BD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Euthymic BD patients with manic (MPP, n = 31), depressive (DPP, n = 25), undetermined predominant polarity (UPP, n = 28), and healthy controls (HC, n = 27) participated in the study. A battery of neurocognitive and social cognitive tests was implemented. Neurocognitive domains were identified via principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MPP group performed worse in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and Hinting Test (HT) compared to the DPP group and reasoning/problem-solving skills compared to the UPP group. Both MPP and UPP groups showed impairments in processing speed compared to HC. Among patient groups, there was no significant difference in working memory, attention, processing speed, verbal, and visual domain scores. The MPP group had poorer scores compared to controls in most of the social cognitive and neurocognitive domains in the study, while the overall cognitive impairment in the DPP group was relatively milder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our sample size was relatively small, the MPP group yielded more severe cognitive impairment in verbal fluency and social cognition tests compared to DPP. Patients with MPP are particularly vulnerable to cognitive impairment, making them a priority for cognitive enhancement interventions. Future studies should focus on the outcomes of cognitive and pharmacological interventions in these polarity subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of predominant polarity on cognitive dysfunctions in patients with bipolar disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Ekin Atay, Çağatay Ermiş, İrem Nur Gökbayrak Atay, Ömer Aydemir, Erol Özmen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40345-024-00363-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is frequently observed in bipolar disorder (BD). Previous findings indicated that predominant polarity could have an effect on cognitive deficits. This study aimed to examine the association between predominant polarity and cognitive impairments in BD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Euthymic BD patients with manic (MPP, n = 31), depressive (DPP, n = 25), undetermined predominant polarity (UPP, n = 28), and healthy controls (HC, n = 27) participated in the study. A battery of neurocognitive and social cognitive tests was implemented. Neurocognitive domains were identified via principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MPP group performed worse in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and Hinting Test (HT) compared to the DPP group and reasoning/problem-solving skills compared to the UPP group. Both MPP and UPP groups showed impairments in processing speed compared to HC. Among patient groups, there was no significant difference in working memory, attention, processing speed, verbal, and visual domain scores. The MPP group had poorer scores compared to controls in most of the social cognitive and neurocognitive domains in the study, while the overall cognitive impairment in the DPP group was relatively milder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our sample size was relatively small, the MPP group yielded more severe cognitive impairment in verbal fluency and social cognition tests compared to DPP. Patients with MPP are particularly vulnerable to cognitive impairment, making them a priority for cognitive enhancement interventions. Future studies should focus on the outcomes of cognitive and pharmacological interventions in these polarity subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607196/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-024-00363-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-024-00363-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:认知障碍在双相情感障碍(BD)中经常被观察到。先前的研究结果表明,主导极性可能对认知缺陷有影响。本研究旨在探讨优势极性与BD认知功能障碍的关系。材料和方法:包括躁狂(MPP, n = 31)、抑郁(DPP, n = 25)、未确定优势极性(UPP, n = 28)和健康对照(HC, n = 27)的健康双相障碍患者。进行了一系列神经认知和社会认知测试。通过主成分分析确定神经认知域。结果:MPP组在对照口语单词联想测试(COWAT)、眼读心术测试(RMET)和暗示测试(HT)中表现较DPP组差,推理/解决问题能力较UPP组差。与HC相比,MPP组和UPP组在处理速度上均表现出损伤。在不同的患者组中,工作记忆、注意力、处理速度、语言和视觉领域得分没有显著差异。在研究中,MPP组在大多数社会认知和神经认知领域的得分都低于对照组,而DPP组的整体认知障碍相对较轻。结论:尽管我们的样本量相对较小,但与DPP相比,MPP组在语言流畅性和社会认知测试中出现了更严重的认知障碍。MPP患者特别容易出现认知障碍,因此需要优先进行认知增强干预。未来的研究应该集中在这些极性亚群的认知和药物干预的结果上。
The role of predominant polarity on cognitive dysfunctions in patients with bipolar disorder.
Background: Cognitive impairment is frequently observed in bipolar disorder (BD). Previous findings indicated that predominant polarity could have an effect on cognitive deficits. This study aimed to examine the association between predominant polarity and cognitive impairments in BD.
Materials and methods: Euthymic BD patients with manic (MPP, n = 31), depressive (DPP, n = 25), undetermined predominant polarity (UPP, n = 28), and healthy controls (HC, n = 27) participated in the study. A battery of neurocognitive and social cognitive tests was implemented. Neurocognitive domains were identified via principal component analysis.
Results: The MPP group performed worse in the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and Hinting Test (HT) compared to the DPP group and reasoning/problem-solving skills compared to the UPP group. Both MPP and UPP groups showed impairments in processing speed compared to HC. Among patient groups, there was no significant difference in working memory, attention, processing speed, verbal, and visual domain scores. The MPP group had poorer scores compared to controls in most of the social cognitive and neurocognitive domains in the study, while the overall cognitive impairment in the DPP group was relatively milder.
Conclusions: Although our sample size was relatively small, the MPP group yielded more severe cognitive impairment in verbal fluency and social cognition tests compared to DPP. Patients with MPP are particularly vulnerable to cognitive impairment, making them a priority for cognitive enhancement interventions. Future studies should focus on the outcomes of cognitive and pharmacological interventions in these polarity subgroups.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.