BRCA1/2变异携带者对侧乳腺癌继发性风险降低策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jing Yu, Shan Jiang, Taoran Liu, Yangyang Gao, Xinyang Ma, Ginenus Fekadu, Yunqiu Xia, Bonny Parkinson, Wai-kit Ming, Yuanyuan Gu
{"title":"BRCA1/2变异携带者对侧乳腺癌继发性风险降低策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Jing Yu,&nbsp;Shan Jiang,&nbsp;Taoran Liu,&nbsp;Yangyang Gao,&nbsp;Xinyang Ma,&nbsp;Ginenus Fekadu,&nbsp;Yunqiu Xia,&nbsp;Bonny Parkinson,&nbsp;Wai-kit Ming,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Gu","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03054-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Breast cancer poses significant challenges, especially the increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in <i>BRCA1/2</i> variant carriers. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of secondary risk-reducing strategies for CBC in <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted from January 2000 to December 2023, including RCTs, cohort, or case–control studies involving <i>BRCA</i> carriers with unilateral breast cancer. Random-effects models were used for odds ratios (ORs) on CBC incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), with bias assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 23,840 participants from 26 studies were included. Secondary risk-reducing interventions reduced CBC incidence by 38% [OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.68] and improved OS by 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46–0.67). Subgroup analyses showed differences by <i>BRCA</i> type, menopausal status, and treatment duration. For <i>BRCA</i>1 carriers, chemotherapy was most effective, while, for <i>BRCA</i>2, it was endocrine therapy. Postmenopausal interventions reduced CBC by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40–0.71), while premenopausal carriers saw a 34% reduction (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.82). Tamoxifen’s effect diminished over time.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Secondary prophylaxis reduces CBC and improves OS in <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers, with variations by genetic and physiological factors. These findings underscore the need for personalized strategies, considering menopausal status and treatment duration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 1","pages":"106 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Risk-Reducing Strategies for Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jing Yu,&nbsp;Shan Jiang,&nbsp;Taoran Liu,&nbsp;Yangyang Gao,&nbsp;Xinyang Ma,&nbsp;Ginenus Fekadu,&nbsp;Yunqiu Xia,&nbsp;Bonny Parkinson,&nbsp;Wai-kit Ming,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-03054-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Breast cancer poses significant challenges, especially the increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in <i>BRCA1/2</i> variant carriers. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of secondary risk-reducing strategies for CBC in <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted from January 2000 to December 2023, including RCTs, cohort, or case–control studies involving <i>BRCA</i> carriers with unilateral breast cancer. Random-effects models were used for odds ratios (ORs) on CBC incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), with bias assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 23,840 participants from 26 studies were included. Secondary risk-reducing interventions reduced CBC incidence by 38% [OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.68] and improved OS by 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46–0.67). Subgroup analyses showed differences by <i>BRCA</i> type, menopausal status, and treatment duration. For <i>BRCA</i>1 carriers, chemotherapy was most effective, while, for <i>BRCA</i>2, it was endocrine therapy. Postmenopausal interventions reduced CBC by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40–0.71), while premenopausal carriers saw a 34% reduction (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.82). Tamoxifen’s effect diminished over time.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Secondary prophylaxis reduces CBC and improves OS in <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers, with variations by genetic and physiological factors. These findings underscore the need for personalized strategies, considering menopausal status and treatment duration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03054-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03054-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌带来了重大挑战,特别是BRCA1/2变异携带者患对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的风险增加。本研究系统回顾和分析了BRCA1/2携带者CBC二级风险降低策略的有效性。方法:从2000年1月至2023年12月进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括涉及BRCA携带者单侧乳腺癌的随机对照试验、队列研究或病例对照研究。随机效应模型用于CBC发病率的优势比(ORs)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(hr),并通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚。结果:共纳入26项研究的23840名参与者。二级降低风险干预使CBC发病率降低38% [OR 0.62, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.57-0.68],使OS改善45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.67)。亚组分析显示BRCA类型、绝经状态和治疗时间的差异。对于BRCA1携带者,化疗是最有效的,而对于BRCA2携带者,则是内分泌治疗。绝经后干预使CBC减少47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.71),而绝经前携带者减少34% (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.82)。他莫昔芬的效果随着时间的推移而减弱。结论:二级预防可降低BRCA1/2携带者的CBC并改善OS,但存在遗传和生理因素差异。这些发现强调了考虑到绝经状态和治疗时间的个性化策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary Risk-Reducing Strategies for Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

Breast cancer poses significant challenges, especially the increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in BRCA1/2 variant carriers. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of secondary risk-reducing strategies for CBC in BRCA1/2 carriers.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted from January 2000 to December 2023, including RCTs, cohort, or case–control studies involving BRCA carriers with unilateral breast cancer. Random-effects models were used for odds ratios (ORs) on CBC incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), with bias assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results

A total of 23,840 participants from 26 studies were included. Secondary risk-reducing interventions reduced CBC incidence by 38% [OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.68] and improved OS by 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46–0.67). Subgroup analyses showed differences by BRCA type, menopausal status, and treatment duration. For BRCA1 carriers, chemotherapy was most effective, while, for BRCA2, it was endocrine therapy. Postmenopausal interventions reduced CBC by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40–0.71), while premenopausal carriers saw a 34% reduction (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.82). Tamoxifen’s effect diminished over time.

Conclusion

Secondary prophylaxis reduces CBC and improves OS in BRCA1/2 carriers, with variations by genetic and physiological factors. These findings underscore the need for personalized strategies, considering menopausal status and treatment duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信