二阶偏振传播子方法在1JFC和nJFH核磁共振自旋-自旋耦合常数计算中的性能

IF 5.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043
Marinella de Giovanetti, Rodrigo A Cormanich, Stephan P A Sauer
{"title":"二阶偏振传播子方法在1JFC和nJFH核磁共振自旋-自旋耦合常数计算中的性能","authors":"Marinella de Giovanetti, Rodrigo A Cormanich, Stephan P A Sauer","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of doubles-corrected random phase approximation (RPA) and higher random phase approximation (HRPA) approaches in predicting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants involving fluorine. Their performance is benchmarked against experimental data and compared with that of higher-level theoretical methods, specifically second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) and SOPPA(CCSD). Additionally, we discuss their performance relative to density functional theory (DFT). We find that RPA(D) is severely constrained by (near) triplet instabilities, while HRPA(D) demonstrates markedly improved stability. Statistical analysis reveals stronger patterns for carbon-fluorine couplings across the methods and systems investigated compared with fluorine-hydrogen couplings. While SOPPA-based methodologies prove to be superior in accuracy, HRPA(D) shows promising performance in reducing the computational burden of these calculations, albeit with a tendency to underestimate the coupling strength. These findings highlight the potential of HRPA(D) as a practical alternative to SOPPA methods, even for such difficult properties as NMR spin-spin coupling constants involving fluorine, emphasizing its role in improving predictive accuracy and efficiency across diverse chemical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"10453-10467"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Performance of Second-Order Polarization Propagator Methods in the Calculation of <sup>1</sup><i>J</i><sub>FC</sub> and <i><sup>n</sup>J</i><sub>FH</sub> NMR Spin-Spin Coupling Constants.\",\"authors\":\"Marinella de Giovanetti, Rodrigo A Cormanich, Stephan P A Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of doubles-corrected random phase approximation (RPA) and higher random phase approximation (HRPA) approaches in predicting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants involving fluorine. Their performance is benchmarked against experimental data and compared with that of higher-level theoretical methods, specifically second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) and SOPPA(CCSD). Additionally, we discuss their performance relative to density functional theory (DFT). We find that RPA(D) is severely constrained by (near) triplet instabilities, while HRPA(D) demonstrates markedly improved stability. Statistical analysis reveals stronger patterns for carbon-fluorine couplings across the methods and systems investigated compared with fluorine-hydrogen couplings. While SOPPA-based methodologies prove to be superior in accuracy, HRPA(D) shows promising performance in reducing the computational burden of these calculations, albeit with a tendency to underestimate the coupling strength. These findings highlight the potential of HRPA(D) as a practical alternative to SOPPA methods, even for such difficult properties as NMR spin-spin coupling constants involving fluorine, emphasizing its role in improving predictive accuracy and efficiency across diverse chemical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10453-10467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了双校正随机相位近似(RPA)和更高随机相位近似(HRPA)方法在预测涉及氟的核磁共振(NMR)耦合常数方面的性能。以实验数据为基准,并与更高层次的理论方法,特别是二阶偏振传播算子(SOPPA)和SOPPA(CCSD)的性能进行了比较。此外,我们讨论了它们的性能相对于密度泛函理论(DFT)。我们发现RPA(D)受到(近)三联体不稳定性的严重约束,而HRPA(D)表现出明显改善的稳定性。统计分析显示,与氟-氢耦合相比,碳-氟耦合在研究方法和系统中的模式更强。虽然基于soppa的方法被证明在准确性方面更优越,但HRPA(D)在减少这些计算的计算负担方面显示出有希望的性能,尽管有低估耦合强度的倾向。这些发现突出了HRPA(D)作为SOPPA方法的实际替代方法的潜力,即使对于诸如涉及氟的NMR自旋-自旋耦合常数等困难的性质,也强调了其在提高不同化学环境下预测准确性和效率方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Performance of Second-Order Polarization Propagator Methods in the Calculation of 1JFC and nJFH NMR Spin-Spin Coupling Constants.

This study evaluates the performance of doubles-corrected random phase approximation (RPA) and higher random phase approximation (HRPA) approaches in predicting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants involving fluorine. Their performance is benchmarked against experimental data and compared with that of higher-level theoretical methods, specifically second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) and SOPPA(CCSD). Additionally, we discuss their performance relative to density functional theory (DFT). We find that RPA(D) is severely constrained by (near) triplet instabilities, while HRPA(D) demonstrates markedly improved stability. Statistical analysis reveals stronger patterns for carbon-fluorine couplings across the methods and systems investigated compared with fluorine-hydrogen couplings. While SOPPA-based methodologies prove to be superior in accuracy, HRPA(D) shows promising performance in reducing the computational burden of these calculations, albeit with a tendency to underestimate the coupling strength. These findings highlight the potential of HRPA(D) as a practical alternative to SOPPA methods, even for such difficult properties as NMR spin-spin coupling constants involving fluorine, emphasizing its role in improving predictive accuracy and efficiency across diverse chemical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信