C. C. Ortel, T. L. Roberts, M. Popp, W. J. Ross, N. A. Slaton, M. R. Parvej
{"title":"利用收益矩阵对大豆应季施钾的经济考虑","authors":"C. C. Ortel, T. L. Roberts, M. Popp, W. J. Ross, N. A. Slaton, M. R. Parvej","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Potassium (K) deficiency is a common yield-limiting factor in Arkansas soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.) production that can be addressed with innovative supplemental fertilizer application. An established leaf sampling protocol and dynamic critical concentration allow accurate diagnosis of K deficiency with corresponding recommendations for corrective, in-season K fertilizer applications at site-specific rates and times to reach anticipated yield goals. However, the profitability of in-season K fertilizer applications to irrigated soybean remains unclear. Research was conducted in Arkansas from 2021 to 2023 to evaluate multiple rates of in-season applications of muriate of potash to soybean at 15 and 30 days after first flower (DAR1). The economic ramifications of in-season fertilizer applications were quantified by calculating yield averages, partial returns (PRs), and regret when comparing PR to not fertilizing, each assuming 5-year average prices for fertilizer and soybean grain. Significant yield responses to in-season potash fertilizer were found at both 15 and 30 DAR1 times. These yield increases translated to large increases in PR or lower regret when compared to using no fertilizer. Corrective applications of 74–112 kg K ha<sup>−1</sup> were often considered optimal, with risk assessments provided to allow informed decisions. Results were summarized by category of leaf-K concentration, and treatment averages were provided to calculate payoff matrices for 15 and 30 DAR1 times. The resulting payoff matrices can be used as a decision support tool with any grain and fertilizer price to facilitate informed management decisions that optimize profitability as soybean and fertilizer prices impact optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21726","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic considerations of in-season potassium applications to soybean using payoff matrices\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Ortel, T. L. Roberts, M. Popp, W. J. Ross, N. A. Slaton, M. R. Parvej\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Potassium (K) deficiency is a common yield-limiting factor in Arkansas soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.) production that can be addressed with innovative supplemental fertilizer application. An established leaf sampling protocol and dynamic critical concentration allow accurate diagnosis of K deficiency with corresponding recommendations for corrective, in-season K fertilizer applications at site-specific rates and times to reach anticipated yield goals. However, the profitability of in-season K fertilizer applications to irrigated soybean remains unclear. Research was conducted in Arkansas from 2021 to 2023 to evaluate multiple rates of in-season applications of muriate of potash to soybean at 15 and 30 days after first flower (DAR1). The economic ramifications of in-season fertilizer applications were quantified by calculating yield averages, partial returns (PRs), and regret when comparing PR to not fertilizing, each assuming 5-year average prices for fertilizer and soybean grain. Significant yield responses to in-season potash fertilizer were found at both 15 and 30 DAR1 times. These yield increases translated to large increases in PR or lower regret when compared to using no fertilizer. Corrective applications of 74–112 kg K ha<sup>−1</sup> were often considered optimal, with risk assessments provided to allow informed decisions. Results were summarized by category of leaf-K concentration, and treatment averages were provided to calculate payoff matrices for 15 and 30 DAR1 times. The resulting payoff matrices can be used as a decision support tool with any grain and fertilizer price to facilitate informed management decisions that optimize profitability as soybean and fertilizer prices impact optimal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21726\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
钾(K)缺乏是阿肯色大豆(Glycine max (L.))常见的产量限制因素。可以通过创新的补充肥料施用来解决Merr.)生产。已建立的叶片取样协议和动态临界浓度可以准确诊断钾缺乏症,并提供相应的纠正建议,以特定地点的速率和时间进行当季钾肥施用,以达到预期的产量目标。然而,当季钾肥用于灌溉大豆的盈利能力尚不清楚。本研究于2021 - 2023年在美国阿肯色州进行,评估了大豆在开花后15天和30天(DAR1)施用钾肥的多种应季施用率。通过计算平均产量、部分回报(PR)以及将PR与不施肥进行比较时的遗憾,量化了应季施肥的经济后果,每个都假设肥料和大豆谷物的5年平均价格。施用15和30 DAR1倍的当季钾肥对产量均有显著的响应。与不施肥相比,这些产量的增加转化为PR的大幅增加或遗憾率的降低。通常认为74-112 kg kha - 1的矫正应用是最佳的,并提供风险评估,以便做出明智的决策。将结果按叶片钾浓度类别进行汇总,并提供15和30次DAR1处理的平均值来计算收益矩阵。所得收益矩阵可以作为任何谷物和肥料价格的决策支持工具,以促进明智的管理决策,优化盈利能力,因为大豆和肥料价格会影响最优结果。
Economic considerations of in-season potassium applications to soybean using payoff matrices
Potassium (K) deficiency is a common yield-limiting factor in Arkansas soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) production that can be addressed with innovative supplemental fertilizer application. An established leaf sampling protocol and dynamic critical concentration allow accurate diagnosis of K deficiency with corresponding recommendations for corrective, in-season K fertilizer applications at site-specific rates and times to reach anticipated yield goals. However, the profitability of in-season K fertilizer applications to irrigated soybean remains unclear. Research was conducted in Arkansas from 2021 to 2023 to evaluate multiple rates of in-season applications of muriate of potash to soybean at 15 and 30 days after first flower (DAR1). The economic ramifications of in-season fertilizer applications were quantified by calculating yield averages, partial returns (PRs), and regret when comparing PR to not fertilizing, each assuming 5-year average prices for fertilizer and soybean grain. Significant yield responses to in-season potash fertilizer were found at both 15 and 30 DAR1 times. These yield increases translated to large increases in PR or lower regret when compared to using no fertilizer. Corrective applications of 74–112 kg K ha−1 were often considered optimal, with risk assessments provided to allow informed decisions. Results were summarized by category of leaf-K concentration, and treatment averages were provided to calculate payoff matrices for 15 and 30 DAR1 times. The resulting payoff matrices can be used as a decision support tool with any grain and fertilizer price to facilitate informed management decisions that optimize profitability as soybean and fertilizer prices impact optimal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.