{"title":"NCAA定居点发展轨迹","authors":"Robert J. Romano J.D., LL.M.","doi":"10.1002/catl.31383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The parties involved in the various NCAA antitrust cases were sent back to the negotiations table by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in September of this year to revise the language of the proposed billion dollar agreement before it could be finalized and made an order of the court. (The antitrust matters involved <i>House v. NCAA</i> (No. 4:20-cv-03919, N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020), <i>Carter v. NCAA</i> (No. 4;23-cv-06325), and <i>Hubbard v. NCAA</i> (No. 4:23-cv-01593).) One of the judge's primary concerns involved the wording wherein boosters would only provide money to student-athletes for what was referred to as a “valid business purpose.”</p>","PeriodicalId":100289,"journal":{"name":"College Athletics and the Law","volume":"21 8","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Track path of NCAA settlement developments\",\"authors\":\"Robert J. Romano J.D., LL.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/catl.31383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The parties involved in the various NCAA antitrust cases were sent back to the negotiations table by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in September of this year to revise the language of the proposed billion dollar agreement before it could be finalized and made an order of the court. (The antitrust matters involved <i>House v. NCAA</i> (No. 4:20-cv-03919, N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020), <i>Carter v. NCAA</i> (No. 4;23-cv-06325), and <i>Hubbard v. NCAA</i> (No. 4:23-cv-01593).) One of the judge's primary concerns involved the wording wherein boosters would only provide money to student-athletes for what was referred to as a “valid business purpose.”</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College Athletics and the Law\",\"volume\":\"21 8\",\"pages\":\"3-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College Athletics and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/catl.31383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College Athletics and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/catl.31383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
今年9月，美国地区法官克劳迪娅·威尔肯（Claudia Wilken）将涉及NCAA各种反垄断案件的各方送回谈判桌，以修改拟议的10亿美元协议的措辞，然后才能最终确定并由法院发布命令。（反垄断案件涉及House诉NCAA案（No. 4:20-cv-03919， N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020）、Carter诉NCAA案（No. 4;23-cv-06325）和Hubbard诉NCAA案（No. 4:23-cv-01593）。）法官主要担心的一个问题是，赞助商只会出于所谓的“正当商业目的”向学生运动员提供资金。
The parties involved in the various NCAA antitrust cases were sent back to the negotiations table by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in September of this year to revise the language of the proposed billion dollar agreement before it could be finalized and made an order of the court. (The antitrust matters involved House v. NCAA (No. 4:20-cv-03919, N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020), Carter v. NCAA (No. 4;23-cv-06325), and Hubbard v. NCAA (No. 4:23-cv-01593).) One of the judge's primary concerns involved the wording wherein boosters would only provide money to student-athletes for what was referred to as a “valid business purpose.”
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
