淹水胁迫下水稻基因型的解读及产量稳定性分析的最佳条件

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Prajjwal Pradhan, Bimal Das, Deepak Kumar, Victor Phani, Surajit Kundu
{"title":"淹水胁迫下水稻基因型的解读及产量稳定性分析的最佳条件","authors":"Prajjwal Pradhan,&nbsp;Bimal Das,&nbsp;Deepak Kumar,&nbsp;Victor Phani,&nbsp;Surajit Kundu","doi":"10.1111/jac.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the flood-prone area, the improved high-yielding variety of rice declines its vegetative growth and suffers substantial yield losses due to water stagnation. To address the issue measurement, the present work implemented 45 rice genotypes in a randomized complete block design with three replicates over three consecutive years (2018–2021) across submergence (E1, E3, E5) and optimum environments (E2, E4, E6) to assess the adaptability of these genotypes and identify the most desirable type by various stability indices. A significant genotype × environment interaction (GEI) was found in the combined ANOVA of yield and its component traits. The combined analyses of yield component traits through the multi-trait stability index (MTSI) and yield-stability statistics (<i>YSi</i>) found the most promising genotypes G20 and G32, respectively. The mean grain yield advantage was found in G18 under submerged conditions and G25 across the environments. A highly significant correlation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) exists between the stress tolerance index and yield in both submergence (<i>r</i> = 0.96) and normal (<i>r</i> = 0.90) circumstances. Among genotypes G18, G5 and G19, G20 showed strong stability for grain yield based on univariate stability parameters (YSi, σi2, Wi2, S2d and bi). An AMMI1 biplot analysis indicated that genotypes G37, G45, G32, G31, G27, G28, G19, G17 and G7 exhibited stability for grain yields, with IPCA1 values approaching zero. The GGE biplot analysis on yield was constructed into two mega-environments, where G18 (Narkel Chari), G31 (CR Dhan-500), G9 (Bhasha Manik) and G40 (SS-1) were winners of submergence stress and G25 (Narayan Kamini) was the winner of normal environments.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering Rice Genotypes Under Submergence Stress and Optimum Condition for Yield Stability Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Prajjwal Pradhan,&nbsp;Bimal Das,&nbsp;Deepak Kumar,&nbsp;Victor Phani,&nbsp;Surajit Kundu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jac.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the flood-prone area, the improved high-yielding variety of rice declines its vegetative growth and suffers substantial yield losses due to water stagnation. To address the issue measurement, the present work implemented 45 rice genotypes in a randomized complete block design with three replicates over three consecutive years (2018–2021) across submergence (E1, E3, E5) and optimum environments (E2, E4, E6) to assess the adaptability of these genotypes and identify the most desirable type by various stability indices. A significant genotype × environment interaction (GEI) was found in the combined ANOVA of yield and its component traits. The combined analyses of yield component traits through the multi-trait stability index (MTSI) and yield-stability statistics (<i>YSi</i>) found the most promising genotypes G20 and G32, respectively. The mean grain yield advantage was found in G18 under submerged conditions and G25 across the environments. A highly significant correlation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) exists between the stress tolerance index and yield in both submergence (<i>r</i> = 0.96) and normal (<i>r</i> = 0.90) circumstances. Among genotypes G18, G5 and G19, G20 showed strong stability for grain yield based on univariate stability parameters (YSi, σi2, Wi2, S2d and bi). An AMMI1 biplot analysis indicated that genotypes G37, G45, G32, G31, G27, G28, G19, G17 and G7 exhibited stability for grain yields, with IPCA1 values approaching zero. The GGE biplot analysis on yield was constructed into two mega-environments, where G18 (Narkel Chari), G31 (CR Dhan-500), G9 (Bhasha Manik) and G40 (SS-1) were winners of submergence stress and G25 (Narayan Kamini) was the winner of normal environments.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在洪涝易发地区,改良高产品种的营养生长下降,因水滞而遭受大量产量损失。为了解决这一问题,本研究采用随机完全区组设计,在连续3年(2018-2021年)的时间里,在淹没(E1、E3、E5)和最佳环境(E2、E4、E6)下,对45个水稻基因型进行了3个重复,以评估这些基因型的适应性,并通过各种稳定性指标确定最理想的基因型。在产量及其组成性状的组合方差分析中发现了显著的基因型-环境互作(GEI)。通过多性状稳定指数(MTSI)和产量稳定统计(YSi)对产量组成性状进行联合分析,分别发现了最有潜力的基因型G20和G32。G18在淹水条件下的平均产量优势明显,G25在各种环境下的平均产量优势明显。在淹水(r = 0.96)和正常(r = 0.90)条件下,抗逆性指数与产量均呈极显著相关(p < 0.01)。在G18、G5和G19基因型中,单变量稳定性参数(YSi、σi2、Wi2、S2d和bi)表明,G20对籽粒产量具有较强的稳定性。AMMI1双图分析表明,G37、G45、G32、G31、G27、G28、G19、G17和G7基因型对粮食产量具有稳定性,IPCA1值接近于零。将GGE产量双图分析构建为两个大环境,其中G18 (Narkel Chari)、G31 (CR Dhan-500)、G9 (Bhasha Manik)和G40 (SS-1)为淹没应力的优胜者,G25 (Narayan Kamini)为正常环境的优胜者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deciphering Rice Genotypes Under Submergence Stress and Optimum Condition for Yield Stability Analysis

In the flood-prone area, the improved high-yielding variety of rice declines its vegetative growth and suffers substantial yield losses due to water stagnation. To address the issue measurement, the present work implemented 45 rice genotypes in a randomized complete block design with three replicates over three consecutive years (2018–2021) across submergence (E1, E3, E5) and optimum environments (E2, E4, E6) to assess the adaptability of these genotypes and identify the most desirable type by various stability indices. A significant genotype × environment interaction (GEI) was found in the combined ANOVA of yield and its component traits. The combined analyses of yield component traits through the multi-trait stability index (MTSI) and yield-stability statistics (YSi) found the most promising genotypes G20 and G32, respectively. The mean grain yield advantage was found in G18 under submerged conditions and G25 across the environments. A highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) exists between the stress tolerance index and yield in both submergence (r = 0.96) and normal (r = 0.90) circumstances. Among genotypes G18, G5 and G19, G20 showed strong stability for grain yield based on univariate stability parameters (YSi, σi2, Wi2, S2d and bi). An AMMI1 biplot analysis indicated that genotypes G37, G45, G32, G31, G27, G28, G19, G17 and G7 exhibited stability for grain yields, with IPCA1 values approaching zero. The GGE biplot analysis on yield was constructed into two mega-environments, where G18 (Narkel Chari), G31 (CR Dhan-500), G9 (Bhasha Manik) and G40 (SS-1) were winners of submergence stress and G25 (Narayan Kamini) was the winner of normal environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信