{"title":"木灰、生物炭和造纸厂生物固体对土壤和植物阳离子的影响","authors":"Eric Manirakiza, Bernard Gagnon, Noura Ziadi","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recycling woody biomass for application to croplands is one option to divert materials from landfills and simultaneously improve degraded soil properties. Considering the diversity of materials that vary widely in characteristics, an understanding of the comparative effects of a single or combined application of these byproducts is missing with regards to soil C accumulation and availability of base and metallic cations. A field study was conducted in Québec City, QC, Canada, to assess the effects relative to untreated control of wood ash (10 and 20 Mg dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), pine biochar (10 Mg dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), papermill biosolids (12 Mg PB dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), and a combination of wood ash and PB on soil C, pH, and cations in a circumneutral loamy soil. The site was cropped to a corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation. All materials were applied before corn planting and the effects of treatment were followed over two growing seasons. Applying wood ash resulted in the statistically largest increases (<i>p </i>< 0.01) in soil pH, percentage base saturation, and Mehlich-3 K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Cd. Wood ash also increased K concentration in straw and total K accumulation for both plants, but its effect on plant metallic cations was limited. With a single application, PB only increased Mehlich-3 Ca with no further effect when combined with wood ash, while pine biochar was limited to sequester soil C. Therefore, this study indicated that wood ash could benefit a corn–soybean rotation by enhancing soil quality and crop yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21714","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil and plant cations as affected by application of wood ash, biochar, and papermill biosolids\",\"authors\":\"Eric Manirakiza, Bernard Gagnon, Noura Ziadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recycling woody biomass for application to croplands is one option to divert materials from landfills and simultaneously improve degraded soil properties. Considering the diversity of materials that vary widely in characteristics, an understanding of the comparative effects of a single or combined application of these byproducts is missing with regards to soil C accumulation and availability of base and metallic cations. A field study was conducted in Québec City, QC, Canada, to assess the effects relative to untreated control of wood ash (10 and 20 Mg dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), pine biochar (10 Mg dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), papermill biosolids (12 Mg PB dry wt. ha<sup>−1</sup>), and a combination of wood ash and PB on soil C, pH, and cations in a circumneutral loamy soil. The site was cropped to a corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation. All materials were applied before corn planting and the effects of treatment were followed over two growing seasons. Applying wood ash resulted in the statistically largest increases (<i>p </i>< 0.01) in soil pH, percentage base saturation, and Mehlich-3 K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Cd. Wood ash also increased K concentration in straw and total K accumulation for both plants, but its effect on plant metallic cations was limited. With a single application, PB only increased Mehlich-3 Ca with no further effect when combined with wood ash, while pine biochar was limited to sequester soil C. Therefore, this study indicated that wood ash could benefit a corn–soybean rotation by enhancing soil quality and crop yield.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21714\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21714\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
回收木质生物质用于农田是一种选择,可以从垃圾填埋场转移材料,同时改善退化的土壤性质。考虑到材料的多样性,这些材料的特性差异很大,在土壤C积累和碱离子和金属阳离子的有效性方面,缺乏对这些副产品的单一或联合施用的比较效应的理解。在加拿大QC的quacimbec市进行了一项实地研究,以评估相对于未经处理的木灰(10和20 Mg干wt. ha - 1)、松树生物炭(10 Mg干wt. ha - 1)、造纸厂生物固体(12 Mg PB干wt. ha - 1)以及木灰和PB的组合对环中性壤土中土壤C、pH和阳离子的影响。该地点种植玉米(Zea mays L.) -大豆[Glycine max (L.)]。稳定。)旋转。所有材料均在玉米种植前施用,并在两个生长季节跟踪处理效果。应用木灰导致统计上最大的增长(p <;木灰对土壤pH、百分比碱饱和度和Mehlich-3 K、Ca、Mg、Zn和Cd的影响均为0.01)。木灰对两种植物秸秆钾浓度和总钾积累均有提高作用,但对植物金属阳离子的影响有限。单次施用时,PB只增加了Mehlich-3 Ca,与木灰配施后没有进一步的效果,而松木炭则仅限于固碳。因此,本研究表明木灰可以通过提高土壤质量和作物产量而有利于玉米-大豆轮作。
Soil and plant cations as affected by application of wood ash, biochar, and papermill biosolids
Recycling woody biomass for application to croplands is one option to divert materials from landfills and simultaneously improve degraded soil properties. Considering the diversity of materials that vary widely in characteristics, an understanding of the comparative effects of a single or combined application of these byproducts is missing with regards to soil C accumulation and availability of base and metallic cations. A field study was conducted in Québec City, QC, Canada, to assess the effects relative to untreated control of wood ash (10 and 20 Mg dry wt. ha−1), pine biochar (10 Mg dry wt. ha−1), papermill biosolids (12 Mg PB dry wt. ha−1), and a combination of wood ash and PB on soil C, pH, and cations in a circumneutral loamy soil. The site was cropped to a corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. All materials were applied before corn planting and the effects of treatment were followed over two growing seasons. Applying wood ash resulted in the statistically largest increases (p < 0.01) in soil pH, percentage base saturation, and Mehlich-3 K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Cd. Wood ash also increased K concentration in straw and total K accumulation for both plants, but its effect on plant metallic cations was limited. With a single application, PB only increased Mehlich-3 Ca with no further effect when combined with wood ash, while pine biochar was limited to sequester soil C. Therefore, this study indicated that wood ash could benefit a corn–soybean rotation by enhancing soil quality and crop yield.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.