Guoqing Lei, Wenzhi Zeng, Jin Yu, Jie He, Shenzhou Liu, Xinxin Shao, Zhipeng Ren, Thomas Gaiser, Amit Kumar Srivastava
{"title":"基于机械和机器学习方法的Rice Haun阶段估计","authors":"Guoqing Lei, Wenzhi Zeng, Jin Yu, Jie He, Shenzhou Liu, Xinxin Shao, Zhipeng Ren, Thomas Gaiser, Amit Kumar Srivastava","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Haun stage (HS), a continuous numerical phenological indicator of cereal crops, is widely used in agronomic management. However, few models have been developed to estimate HS considering the diverse environmental and agronomic influences. In this study, a dataset comprising 2350 HS observations of two rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) cultivars (Longjing31 and Suijing18) and variables including planting spatiotemporal information, transplanting day of year (TDOY), accumulated air temperature (AcTem), and remote-sensing vegetation indices (VIs) were collected from 226 field plots. Two mechanistic phenology models, Streck and Phyllochron, and three machine learning (ML) models, including the generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and deep learning (DL), were developed to predict the HS with different combinations of inputs. The results indicate that three ML models outperformed two mechanistic models, even when using simple spatiotemporal data, the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) decreased by more than 0.023. Especially for GBM and DL models exhibiting similar prediction accuracy (RRMSE from 0.0336 to 0.0543), GBM performs relatively better when VIs are included as input factors. The relative error density distributions (REDDs) of estimated HS in the three ML models were relatively spread out when using limited predictive information of spatiotemporal and VIs, especially during the late rice growth stage and for the Suijing18 cultivar. The inclusion of crop cultivar information enhanced the consistency of REDD, and either VIs or (TDOY, AcTem) provided sufficient information for accurate HS estimation. These findings can provide valuable insights for crop phenology estimation and agronomic practices under varying environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rice Haun stage estimation based on mechanistic and machine learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Guoqing Lei, Wenzhi Zeng, Jin Yu, Jie He, Shenzhou Liu, Xinxin Shao, Zhipeng Ren, Thomas Gaiser, Amit Kumar Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Haun stage (HS), a continuous numerical phenological indicator of cereal crops, is widely used in agronomic management. However, few models have been developed to estimate HS considering the diverse environmental and agronomic influences. In this study, a dataset comprising 2350 HS observations of two rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) cultivars (Longjing31 and Suijing18) and variables including planting spatiotemporal information, transplanting day of year (TDOY), accumulated air temperature (AcTem), and remote-sensing vegetation indices (VIs) were collected from 226 field plots. Two mechanistic phenology models, Streck and Phyllochron, and three machine learning (ML) models, including the generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and deep learning (DL), were developed to predict the HS with different combinations of inputs. The results indicate that three ML models outperformed two mechanistic models, even when using simple spatiotemporal data, the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) decreased by more than 0.023. Especially for GBM and DL models exhibiting similar prediction accuracy (RRMSE from 0.0336 to 0.0543), GBM performs relatively better when VIs are included as input factors. The relative error density distributions (REDDs) of estimated HS in the three ML models were relatively spread out when using limited predictive information of spatiotemporal and VIs, especially during the late rice growth stage and for the Suijing18 cultivar. The inclusion of crop cultivar information enhanced the consistency of REDD, and either VIs or (TDOY, AcTem) provided sufficient information for accurate HS estimation. These findings can provide valuable insights for crop phenology estimation and agronomic practices under varying environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21733\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rice Haun stage estimation based on mechanistic and machine learning methods
Haun stage (HS), a continuous numerical phenological indicator of cereal crops, is widely used in agronomic management. However, few models have been developed to estimate HS considering the diverse environmental and agronomic influences. In this study, a dataset comprising 2350 HS observations of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (Longjing31 and Suijing18) and variables including planting spatiotemporal information, transplanting day of year (TDOY), accumulated air temperature (AcTem), and remote-sensing vegetation indices (VIs) were collected from 226 field plots. Two mechanistic phenology models, Streck and Phyllochron, and three machine learning (ML) models, including the generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and deep learning (DL), were developed to predict the HS with different combinations of inputs. The results indicate that three ML models outperformed two mechanistic models, even when using simple spatiotemporal data, the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) decreased by more than 0.023. Especially for GBM and DL models exhibiting similar prediction accuracy (RRMSE from 0.0336 to 0.0543), GBM performs relatively better when VIs are included as input factors. The relative error density distributions (REDDs) of estimated HS in the three ML models were relatively spread out when using limited predictive information of spatiotemporal and VIs, especially during the late rice growth stage and for the Suijing18 cultivar. The inclusion of crop cultivar information enhanced the consistency of REDD, and either VIs or (TDOY, AcTem) provided sufficient information for accurate HS estimation. These findings can provide valuable insights for crop phenology estimation and agronomic practices under varying environments.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.