澳洲蛇形叶螨种群对杀虫剂的抗性研究(双翅目:稻蝇科)

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Duong T. Nguyen, Yizhou Chen, Grant A. Herron
{"title":"澳洲蛇形叶螨种群对杀虫剂的抗性研究(双翅目:稻蝇科)","authors":"Duong T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Yizhou Chen,&nbsp;Grant A. Herron","doi":"10.1111/aen.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Serpentine leaf miner, <i>Liriomyza huidobrensis</i>, invaded New South Wales and Queensland late 2020. Overseas, <i>L. huidobrensis</i> has a history of developing insecticide resistance and, since its Australian discovery, has caused significant control issues in Australian horticultural industries. Here, we developed bioassay methods to test the response of <i>L. huidobrensis</i> larvae to spirotetramat and <i>L. huidobrensis</i> adults to dimethoate, imidacloprid and chlorantraniliprole. Against two New South Wales and one Queensland collected strains, we found a 33-fold elevated response against dimethoate and 200-fold more against imidacloprid than the field-recommended field rates. Furthermore, we found that a maximum rate of 64-fold the field-recommended rate of chlorantraniliprole controlled only 94% of one tested population. Similarly, the maximum rate of spirotetramat tested (64-fold the field-recommended rate) only achieved 84%–94% mortality for the same populations. Prior to our study, the efficacy of chlorantraniliprole and spirotetramat against <i>Liriomyza</i> was poorly studied, with only a few reports with chlorantraniliprole against <i>Liriomyza trifolii</i>. Consequently, none of the tested insecticides in this study will likely control Australian invasive <i>L. huidobrensis</i> at the field-recommended rates. Our results presented here highlight the need to identify and study alternative chemical and biological products and natural enemies for the control of <i>L. huidobrensis</i> in Australian horticulture.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"63 4","pages":"485-491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insecticide resistance in Australian populations of the serpentine leaf miner Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) (Diptera: Agromyzidae)\",\"authors\":\"Duong T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Yizhou Chen,&nbsp;Grant A. Herron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aen.12716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Serpentine leaf miner, <i>Liriomyza huidobrensis</i>, invaded New South Wales and Queensland late 2020. Overseas, <i>L. huidobrensis</i> has a history of developing insecticide resistance and, since its Australian discovery, has caused significant control issues in Australian horticultural industries. Here, we developed bioassay methods to test the response of <i>L. huidobrensis</i> larvae to spirotetramat and <i>L. huidobrensis</i> adults to dimethoate, imidacloprid and chlorantraniliprole. Against two New South Wales and one Queensland collected strains, we found a 33-fold elevated response against dimethoate and 200-fold more against imidacloprid than the field-recommended field rates. Furthermore, we found that a maximum rate of 64-fold the field-recommended rate of chlorantraniliprole controlled only 94% of one tested population. Similarly, the maximum rate of spirotetramat tested (64-fold the field-recommended rate) only achieved 84%–94% mortality for the same populations. Prior to our study, the efficacy of chlorantraniliprole and spirotetramat against <i>Liriomyza</i> was poorly studied, with only a few reports with chlorantraniliprole against <i>Liriomyza trifolii</i>. Consequently, none of the tested insecticides in this study will likely control Australian invasive <i>L. huidobrensis</i> at the field-recommended rates. Our results presented here highlight the need to identify and study alternative chemical and biological products and natural enemies for the control of <i>L. huidobrensis</i> in Australian horticulture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"volume\":\"63 4\",\"pages\":\"485-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12716\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.12716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.12716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛇形叶矿工,Liriomyza huidobrensis,于2020年底入侵新南威尔士州和昆士兰州。在海外,L. huidobrensis具有抗药性的历史,自从在澳大利亚被发现以来,已经引起了澳大利亚园艺业的重大控制问题。本研究采用生物测定法测定了水蛭幼虫对螺虫的反应,水蛭成虫对乐果、吡虫啉和氯虫腈的反应。在两个新南威尔士州和一个昆士兰州收集的菌株中,我们发现对乐果和吡虫啉的反应比现场推荐的反应率高33倍。此外,我们发现氯虫腈的最高施药率是现场推荐施药率的64倍,但仅控制了94%的被试种群。同样,在同样的人群中,检测到的最大螺虫率(是现场推荐率的64倍)只能达到84%-94%的死亡率。在我们的研究之前,氯虫腈和螺虫腈对Liriomyza triolii的疗效研究较少,氯虫腈对Liriomyza trifolii的疗效报道较少。因此,本研究中所测试的杀虫剂都不太可能以田间推荐的速率控制澳大利亚入侵的水蛭。我们的研究结果强调了在澳大利亚园艺中鉴定和研究可替代的化学和生物产品和天敌的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insecticide resistance in Australian populations of the serpentine leaf miner Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) (Diptera: Agromyzidae)

Insecticide resistance in Australian populations of the serpentine leaf miner Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) (Diptera: Agromyzidae)

Serpentine leaf miner, Liriomyza huidobrensis, invaded New South Wales and Queensland late 2020. Overseas, L. huidobrensis has a history of developing insecticide resistance and, since its Australian discovery, has caused significant control issues in Australian horticultural industries. Here, we developed bioassay methods to test the response of L. huidobrensis larvae to spirotetramat and L. huidobrensis adults to dimethoate, imidacloprid and chlorantraniliprole. Against two New South Wales and one Queensland collected strains, we found a 33-fold elevated response against dimethoate and 200-fold more against imidacloprid than the field-recommended field rates. Furthermore, we found that a maximum rate of 64-fold the field-recommended rate of chlorantraniliprole controlled only 94% of one tested population. Similarly, the maximum rate of spirotetramat tested (64-fold the field-recommended rate) only achieved 84%–94% mortality for the same populations. Prior to our study, the efficacy of chlorantraniliprole and spirotetramat against Liriomyza was poorly studied, with only a few reports with chlorantraniliprole against Liriomyza trifolii. Consequently, none of the tested insecticides in this study will likely control Australian invasive L. huidobrensis at the field-recommended rates. Our results presented here highlight the need to identify and study alternative chemical and biological products and natural enemies for the control of L. huidobrensis in Australian horticulture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Entomology
Austral Entomology ENTOMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Austral Entomology is a scientific journal of entomology for the Southern Hemisphere. It publishes Original Articles that are peer-reviewed research papers from the study of the behaviour, biology, biosystematics, conservation biology, ecology, evolution, forensic and medical entomology, molecular biology, public health, urban entomology, physiology and the use and control of insects, arachnids and myriapods. The journal also publishes Reviews on research and theory or commentaries on current areas of research, innovation or rapid development likely to be of broad interest – these may be submitted or invited. Book Reviews will also be considered provided the works are of global significance. Manuscripts from authors in the Northern Hemisphere are encouraged provided that the research has relevance to or broad readership within the Southern Hemisphere. All submissions are peer-reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper. Special issues are encouraged; please contact the Chief Editor for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信