性别比例在集体模型中是一个有效的分配因子吗?

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Yujung Hwang , Toan Nguyen
{"title":"性别比例在集体模型中是一个有效的分配因子吗?","authors":"Yujung Hwang ,&nbsp;Toan Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A distribution factor generates exogenous variation in household members’ bargaining weights, and therefore, it helps identify a collective model. We derive testable hypotheses of the exogeneity of a single distribution factor in a general collective model. Next, we test whether the local sex ratio – a popular distribution factor in the literature – satisfies the exclusion restriction required of distribution factors using the dual-earner sample in Japanese and Australian data. We reject the exclusion restriction for Japan but not for Australia, which is explained by a dependency between the local sex ratio and local gender norms in Japan. We discuss its implication on the marriage market matching model equilibrium. Next, we conclude by investigating alternative distribution factors, but we find similar endogeneity issues in the Japanese sample, implying that understanding cultural context would be critical when choosing a distribution factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is sex ratio a valid distribution factor in a collective model?\",\"authors\":\"Yujung Hwang ,&nbsp;Toan Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A distribution factor generates exogenous variation in household members’ bargaining weights, and therefore, it helps identify a collective model. We derive testable hypotheses of the exogeneity of a single distribution factor in a general collective model. Next, we test whether the local sex ratio – a popular distribution factor in the literature – satisfies the exclusion restriction required of distribution factors using the dual-earner sample in Japanese and Australian data. We reject the exclusion restriction for Japan but not for Australia, which is explained by a dependency between the local sex ratio and local gender norms in Japan. We discuss its implication on the marriage market matching model equilibrium. Next, we conclude by investigating alternative distribution factors, but we find similar endogeneity issues in the Japanese sample, implying that understanding cultural context would be critical when choosing a distribution factor.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour Economics\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753712400143X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753712400143X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分配因子产生家庭成员议价权的外生变化,因此,它有助于确定一个集体模型。我们推导出一般集体模型中单个分布因子的外生性的可检验假设。接下来,我们用日本和澳大利亚的双职工样本数据来检验当地的性别比例——一个在文献中很受欢迎的分布因子——是否满足分布因子所要求的排除限制。我们反对日本的排除限制,但不反对澳大利亚的排除限制,这可以用日本当地性别比例与当地性别规范之间的依赖关系来解释。讨论了其对婚姻市场匹配模型均衡的启示。接下来,我们通过调查其他分配因素得出结论,但我们在日本样本中发现了类似的内质性问题,这意味着在选择分配因素时,理解文化背景至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is sex ratio a valid distribution factor in a collective model?
A distribution factor generates exogenous variation in household members’ bargaining weights, and therefore, it helps identify a collective model. We derive testable hypotheses of the exogeneity of a single distribution factor in a general collective model. Next, we test whether the local sex ratio – a popular distribution factor in the literature – satisfies the exclusion restriction required of distribution factors using the dual-earner sample in Japanese and Australian data. We reject the exclusion restriction for Japan but not for Australia, which is explained by a dependency between the local sex ratio and local gender norms in Japan. We discuss its implication on the marriage market matching model equilibrium. Next, we conclude by investigating alternative distribution factors, but we find similar endogeneity issues in the Japanese sample, implying that understanding cultural context would be critical when choosing a distribution factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信