通过区分水和温度对地上和地下源的控制,改进生态系统呼吸对CO2通量分配的估算

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shuai Wang , Shujing Qin , Lei Cheng, Kaijie Zou, Chenhao Fu, Pan Liu, Lu Zhang
{"title":"通过区分水和温度对地上和地下源的控制,改进生态系统呼吸对CO2通量分配的估算","authors":"Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Shujing Qin ,&nbsp;Lei Cheng,&nbsp;Kaijie Zou,&nbsp;Chenhao Fu,&nbsp;Pan Liu,&nbsp;Lu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Empirical models for estimating ecosystem respiration (ER) are widely used in CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms that partition net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ER due to advantages of simple structures. However, empirical ER models remain limited due to single-source conceptualization that doesn’t discriminate different responses of aboveground respiration (AGR) and belowground respiration (BGR) to environmental factors (i.e., temperature and/or soil moisture). In this study, a dual-source module with only one parameter <em>α</em> was proposed and incorporated into six widely used ER models to enhance model capabilities. Long-term flux measurements of six typical terrestrial ecosystems and soil chamber respiration data at two sites were collected to evaluate models. Results showed that integration of the dual-source module can significantly improve the performance of empirical models in selected ecosystems with mean <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> improvement of 0.10 ± 0.16. The site years with relative increased <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> (Δ<em>R<sup>2</sup></em>) larger than 10 % range from 6 % to 79 % amongst different models. Further validation between soil respiration and estimated BGR showed good correlations (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.7) and demonstrated that proposed method can provide robust estimate of above/belowground respiration. Calibrated <em>α</em> varies amongst ecosystem types. Further analysis indicates variation of <em>α</em> is largely influenced by ratio of above/belowground biomass and annual average moisture conditions. Our findings highlight the critical need for partitioning ER models into dual-source for developing CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms and support the approach as an effective means to enhance the understanding of global carbon cycles with changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112855"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Shujing Qin ,&nbsp;Lei Cheng,&nbsp;Kaijie Zou,&nbsp;Chenhao Fu,&nbsp;Pan Liu,&nbsp;Lu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Empirical models for estimating ecosystem respiration (ER) are widely used in CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms that partition net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ER due to advantages of simple structures. However, empirical ER models remain limited due to single-source conceptualization that doesn’t discriminate different responses of aboveground respiration (AGR) and belowground respiration (BGR) to environmental factors (i.e., temperature and/or soil moisture). In this study, a dual-source module with only one parameter <em>α</em> was proposed and incorporated into six widely used ER models to enhance model capabilities. Long-term flux measurements of six typical terrestrial ecosystems and soil chamber respiration data at two sites were collected to evaluate models. Results showed that integration of the dual-source module can significantly improve the performance of empirical models in selected ecosystems with mean <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> improvement of 0.10 ± 0.16. The site years with relative increased <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> (Δ<em>R<sup>2</sup></em>) larger than 10 % range from 6 % to 79 % amongst different models. Further validation between soil respiration and estimated BGR showed good correlations (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.7) and demonstrated that proposed method can provide robust estimate of above/belowground respiration. Calibrated <em>α</em> varies amongst ecosystem types. Further analysis indicates variation of <em>α</em> is largely influenced by ratio of above/belowground biomass and annual average moisture conditions. Our findings highlight the critical need for partitioning ER models into dual-source for developing CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms and support the approach as an effective means to enhance the understanding of global carbon cycles with changing climate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统呼吸(ER)估算的经验模型由于结构简单的优点,被广泛应用于二氧化碳通量划分算法中,该算法将生态系统净二氧化碳交换(NEE)划分为总初级生产力(GPP)和ER。然而,由于单一来源的概念,不能区分地上呼吸(AGR)和地下呼吸(BGR)对环境因子(即温度和/或土壤湿度)的不同响应,经验ER模型仍然有限。在这项研究中,提出了一个只有一个参数α的双源模块,并将其纳入六个广泛使用的ER模型中,以提高模型的能力。收集了6个典型陆地生态系统的长期通量测量数据和2个站点的土壤室呼吸数据,对模型进行了评价。结果表明,在选择的生态系统中,整合双源模块可以显著提高实证模型的绩效,平均R2提高0.10±0.16。在不同的模型中,R2 (ΔR2)相对增加大于10%的站点年从6%到79%不等。进一步验证土壤呼吸与估算BGR之间存在良好的相关性(r >;0.7),并证明了所提出的方法可以提供地上/地下呼吸的稳健估计。校准α因生态系统类型而异。进一步分析表明,α的变化主要受地上/地下生物量比和年平均湿度条件的影响。我们的研究结果强调了将ER模型划分为双源的迫切需要,以开发二氧化碳通量划分算法,并支持该方法作为增强对气候变化下全球碳循环的理解的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources
Empirical models for estimating ecosystem respiration (ER) are widely used in CO2 flux partitioning algorithms that partition net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ER due to advantages of simple structures. However, empirical ER models remain limited due to single-source conceptualization that doesn’t discriminate different responses of aboveground respiration (AGR) and belowground respiration (BGR) to environmental factors (i.e., temperature and/or soil moisture). In this study, a dual-source module with only one parameter α was proposed and incorporated into six widely used ER models to enhance model capabilities. Long-term flux measurements of six typical terrestrial ecosystems and soil chamber respiration data at two sites were collected to evaluate models. Results showed that integration of the dual-source module can significantly improve the performance of empirical models in selected ecosystems with mean R2 improvement of 0.10 ± 0.16. The site years with relative increased R2R2) larger than 10 % range from 6 % to 79 % amongst different models. Further validation between soil respiration and estimated BGR showed good correlations (r > 0.7) and demonstrated that proposed method can provide robust estimate of above/belowground respiration. Calibrated α varies amongst ecosystem types. Further analysis indicates variation of α is largely influenced by ratio of above/belowground biomass and annual average moisture conditions. Our findings highlight the critical need for partitioning ER models into dual-source for developing CO2 flux partitioning algorithms and support the approach as an effective means to enhance the understanding of global carbon cycles with changing climate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信