运动疗法对慢性颈部疼痛影响的网络meta分析

Q3 Medicine
Qiang Zhao , Ning Zhang , Ruisu Zhang , Yiming Yuan
{"title":"运动疗法对慢性颈部疼痛影响的网络meta分析","authors":"Qiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruisu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiming Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.medntd.2024.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of different exercise therapy on patients with chronic neck pain. By searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and other databases, we screened the literatures that met the inclusion criteria until June 2022. RCT bias risk assessment tool recommended in Cochrane manual was used to evaluate the literature quality, and Stata16.0 software was used for mesh meta-analysis. A total of 76 studies, 12 exercise therapies and 5219 participants were included. In terms of pain, Pilates [MD ​= ​−2.71,95%CI (−3.87, −1.55), P ​= ​0.000] had the most significant effect. Second training for the stability of [MD ​= ​-2.39, 95 ​% CI (−3.14, −1.64), P ​= ​0.000) and VR [MD ​= ​−2.35, 95 ​% CI (−3.6, −1.11), P ​= ​0.000). In terms of functional indexes, respiratory training [MD ​= ​−16.31,95%CI (−28.52, −4.1), P ​= ​0.009] had the most significant effect. Secondly for muscle energy technology [MD ​= ​−7.47, 95 ​% CI (−12.37, −2.58), P ​= ​0.003) and aerobic training [MD ​= ​−7.36, 95 ​% CI (−12.56, −2.16), P ​= ​0.006]. Current evidence shows that Pilates, stability training and virtual reality training are the most effective in pain intervention, muscle energy technology and comprehensive exercise training are outstanding in helping functional recovery, suggesting that appropriate exercise therapy should be implemented according to the symptoms of patients to achieve the best treatment effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33783,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network meta-analysis of the effect of exercise therapy on chronic neck pain\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruisu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiming Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medntd.2024.100337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of different exercise therapy on patients with chronic neck pain. By searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and other databases, we screened the literatures that met the inclusion criteria until June 2022. RCT bias risk assessment tool recommended in Cochrane manual was used to evaluate the literature quality, and Stata16.0 software was used for mesh meta-analysis. A total of 76 studies, 12 exercise therapies and 5219 participants were included. In terms of pain, Pilates [MD ​= ​−2.71,95%CI (−3.87, −1.55), P ​= ​0.000] had the most significant effect. Second training for the stability of [MD ​= ​-2.39, 95 ​% CI (−3.14, −1.64), P ​= ​0.000) and VR [MD ​= ​−2.35, 95 ​% CI (−3.6, −1.11), P ​= ​0.000). In terms of functional indexes, respiratory training [MD ​= ​−16.31,95%CI (−28.52, −4.1), P ​= ​0.009] had the most significant effect. Secondly for muscle energy technology [MD ​= ​−7.47, 95 ​% CI (−12.37, −2.58), P ​= ​0.003) and aerobic training [MD ​= ​−7.36, 95 ​% CI (−12.56, −2.16), P ​= ​0.006]. Current evidence shows that Pilates, stability training and virtual reality training are the most effective in pain intervention, muscle energy technology and comprehensive exercise training are outstanding in helping functional recovery, suggesting that appropriate exercise therapy should be implemented according to the symptoms of patients to achieve the best treatment effect.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093524000535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨不同运动疗法对慢性颈部疼痛患者的治疗效果。通过检索PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、万方数据等数据库,筛选到2022年6月为止符合纳入标准的文献。采用Cochrane手册推荐的RCT偏倚风险评估工具评价文献质量,采用Stata16.0软件进行mesh meta分析。总共包括76项研究,12种运动疗法和5219名参与者。在疼痛方面,普拉提[MD = - 2.71,95%CI (- 3.87, - 1.55), P = 0.000]效果最显著。第二次培训的稳定性(MD = -2.39, 95% CI(−3.14−1.64),P = 0.000)和VR (MD =−2.35,95%可信区间(−3.6−1.11),P = 0.000)。在功能指标方面,呼吸训练效果最显著[MD =−16.31,95%CI(−28.52,−4.1),P = 0.009]。其次对肌肉的能源技术(MD =−7.47,95%可信区间(−12.37−2.58),P = 0.003)和有氧训练(MD =−7.36,95%可信区间(−12.56−2.16),P = 0.006)。目前有证据表明,普拉提、稳定性训练和虚拟现实训练对疼痛干预效果最好,肌肉能量技术和综合运动训练对功能恢复的帮助突出,提示应根据患者的症状实施适当的运动治疗,以达到最佳的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network meta-analysis of the effect of exercise therapy on chronic neck pain
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of different exercise therapy on patients with chronic neck pain. By searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and other databases, we screened the literatures that met the inclusion criteria until June 2022. RCT bias risk assessment tool recommended in Cochrane manual was used to evaluate the literature quality, and Stata16.0 software was used for mesh meta-analysis. A total of 76 studies, 12 exercise therapies and 5219 participants were included. In terms of pain, Pilates [MD ​= ​−2.71,95%CI (−3.87, −1.55), P ​= ​0.000] had the most significant effect. Second training for the stability of [MD ​= ​-2.39, 95 ​% CI (−3.14, −1.64), P ​= ​0.000) and VR [MD ​= ​−2.35, 95 ​% CI (−3.6, −1.11), P ​= ​0.000). In terms of functional indexes, respiratory training [MD ​= ​−16.31,95%CI (−28.52, −4.1), P ​= ​0.009] had the most significant effect. Secondly for muscle energy technology [MD ​= ​−7.47, 95 ​% CI (−12.37, −2.58), P ​= ​0.003) and aerobic training [MD ​= ​−7.36, 95 ​% CI (−12.56, −2.16), P ​= ​0.006]. Current evidence shows that Pilates, stability training and virtual reality training are the most effective in pain intervention, muscle energy technology and comprehensive exercise training are outstanding in helping functional recovery, suggesting that appropriate exercise therapy should be implemented according to the symptoms of patients to achieve the best treatment effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信