Gabriel Konzen , Rohan Best , Nivalde José de Castro
{"title":"照亮差距:澳大利亚和巴西住宅光伏采用不平等的比较分析","authors":"Gabriel Konzen , Rohan Best , Nivalde José de Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103870"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shining a light on disparities: A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Konzen , Rohan Best , Nivalde José de Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004614\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shining a light on disparities: A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil
There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.