跳跳中行动自愿程度对代理感的影响

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julian Gutzeit , Lynn Huestegge
{"title":"跳跳中行动自愿程度对代理感的影响","authors":"Julian Gutzeit ,&nbsp;Lynn Huestegge","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Experiencing a sense of agency (SoA), the feeling of being in control over one’s actions and their outcomes, typically requires intentional and voluntary actions. Prior research has compared the association of voluntary versus <em>completely</em> involuntary actions with the SoA. Here, we leveraged unique characteristics of oculomotor actions to <em>partially</em> manipulate the degree of action voluntariness. Participants performed either highly automatized prosaccades or highly controlled (voluntary) anti-saccades, triggering a gaze-contingent visual action effect. We assessed explicit SoA ratings and temporal action and effect binding as an implicit SoA measure. Anti-saccades were associated with stronger action binding compared to prosaccades, demonstrating a robust association between higher action voluntariness and a stronger implicit sense of action agency. We conclude that our manipulation of action voluntariness may have impacted the implicit phenomenological feeling of bodily agency, but it did not affect the SoA over effect outcomes or explicit agency perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 103793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the degree of action voluntariness on sense of agency in saccades\",\"authors\":\"Julian Gutzeit ,&nbsp;Lynn Huestegge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Experiencing a sense of agency (SoA), the feeling of being in control over one’s actions and their outcomes, typically requires intentional and voluntary actions. Prior research has compared the association of voluntary versus <em>completely</em> involuntary actions with the SoA. Here, we leveraged unique characteristics of oculomotor actions to <em>partially</em> manipulate the degree of action voluntariness. Participants performed either highly automatized prosaccades or highly controlled (voluntary) anti-saccades, triggering a gaze-contingent visual action effect. We assessed explicit SoA ratings and temporal action and effect binding as an implicit SoA measure. Anti-saccades were associated with stronger action binding compared to prosaccades, demonstrating a robust association between higher action voluntariness and a stronger implicit sense of action agency. We conclude that our manipulation of action voluntariness may have impacted the implicit phenomenological feeling of bodily agency, but it did not affect the SoA over effect outcomes or explicit agency perception.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024001600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024001600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体验代理感(SoA),即控制自己的行为及其结果的感觉,通常需要有意和自愿的行为。先前的研究比较了SoA中自愿行为与完全非自愿行为的关联。在这里,我们利用动眼肌动作的独特特征来部分操纵动作自愿的程度。参与者要么进行高度自动化的扫视,要么进行高度受控的(自愿的)反扫视,从而触发随凝视而定的视觉动作效应。我们评估了显式SoA评级以及作为隐式SoA度量的时间动作和效果绑定。反扫视与前扫视相比,具有更强的动作约束,这表明更高的行动自愿性与更强的内隐行动代理感之间存在强大的关联。我们的结论是,我们对行动自愿的操纵可能影响了身体代理的内隐现象学感觉,但它不影响SoA效应结果或外显代理感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of the degree of action voluntariness on sense of agency in saccades
Experiencing a sense of agency (SoA), the feeling of being in control over one’s actions and their outcomes, typically requires intentional and voluntary actions. Prior research has compared the association of voluntary versus completely involuntary actions with the SoA. Here, we leveraged unique characteristics of oculomotor actions to partially manipulate the degree of action voluntariness. Participants performed either highly automatized prosaccades or highly controlled (voluntary) anti-saccades, triggering a gaze-contingent visual action effect. We assessed explicit SoA ratings and temporal action and effect binding as an implicit SoA measure. Anti-saccades were associated with stronger action binding compared to prosaccades, demonstrating a robust association between higher action voluntariness and a stronger implicit sense of action agency. We conclude that our manipulation of action voluntariness may have impacted the implicit phenomenological feeling of bodily agency, but it did not affect the SoA over effect outcomes or explicit agency perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信