评价生物废物价值案例的多标准方法

Carlota Díaz García , Maryori Díaz , Elena Laborda , María Pérez , Pantelis Pekakis
{"title":"评价生物废物价值案例的多标准方法","authors":"Carlota Díaz García ,&nbsp;Maryori Díaz ,&nbsp;Elena Laborda ,&nbsp;María Pérez ,&nbsp;Pantelis Pekakis","doi":"10.1016/j.enss.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The selection of waste-valorization projects is a complex decision process that involves many factors and variables to guarantee an appropriate definition of the best waste-management strategy to be applied for a specific waste typology. Different technological approaches can be identified based on the diverse waste types, such as fish byproducts, spent coffee grounds, used cooking oils, and sewage sludge. To identify the most suitable and sustainable method for processing each residue type, one must consider multiple criteria in the decision-making process (i.e., economic, technological, environmental, social, and political) to define a specific waste-management strategy. In this study, the analytical-hierarchy-process model is applied to evaluate waste-treatment projects based on the criteria above. This methodological approach involves several steps. First, existing state-of-the-art projects are critically reviewed to identify more advanced solutions for waste management. Second, biowaste projects are characterized by the application of multiple criteria and subcriteria. Finally, prioritized solutions are generated to elucidate the ranking of biowaste based on a hierarchical structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100472,"journal":{"name":"Energy Storage and Saving","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 288-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria approach for evaluating biowaste-valorization cases\",\"authors\":\"Carlota Díaz García ,&nbsp;Maryori Díaz ,&nbsp;Elena Laborda ,&nbsp;María Pérez ,&nbsp;Pantelis Pekakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enss.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The selection of waste-valorization projects is a complex decision process that involves many factors and variables to guarantee an appropriate definition of the best waste-management strategy to be applied for a specific waste typology. Different technological approaches can be identified based on the diverse waste types, such as fish byproducts, spent coffee grounds, used cooking oils, and sewage sludge. To identify the most suitable and sustainable method for processing each residue type, one must consider multiple criteria in the decision-making process (i.e., economic, technological, environmental, social, and political) to define a specific waste-management strategy. In this study, the analytical-hierarchy-process model is applied to evaluate waste-treatment projects based on the criteria above. This methodological approach involves several steps. First, existing state-of-the-art projects are critically reviewed to identify more advanced solutions for waste management. Second, biowaste projects are characterized by the application of multiple criteria and subcriteria. Finally, prioritized solutions are generated to elucidate the ranking of biowaste based on a hierarchical structure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Storage and Saving\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 288-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Storage and Saving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772683524000335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Storage and Saving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772683524000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择废物增值项目是一个复杂的决策过程,涉及许多因素和变量,以保证适当确定适用于特定废物类型的最佳废物管理战略。根据不同的废物类型,如鱼副产品、废咖啡渣、用过的食用油和污水污泥,可以确定不同的技术方法。为了确定处理每种残留物类型的最合适和可持续的方法,必须在决策过程中考虑多个标准(即经济、技术、环境、社会和政治),以确定具体的废物管理战略。在此基础上,本文采用层次分析法对垃圾处理项目进行评价。这种方法包括几个步骤。首先,对现有最先进的项目进行严格审查,以确定更先进的废物管理解决方案。其次,生物垃圾项目具有多准则和子准则应用的特点。最后,生成优先级解决方案,阐明基于层次结构的生物废弃物排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicriteria approach for evaluating biowaste-valorization cases
The selection of waste-valorization projects is a complex decision process that involves many factors and variables to guarantee an appropriate definition of the best waste-management strategy to be applied for a specific waste typology. Different technological approaches can be identified based on the diverse waste types, such as fish byproducts, spent coffee grounds, used cooking oils, and sewage sludge. To identify the most suitable and sustainable method for processing each residue type, one must consider multiple criteria in the decision-making process (i.e., economic, technological, environmental, social, and political) to define a specific waste-management strategy. In this study, the analytical-hierarchy-process model is applied to evaluate waste-treatment projects based on the criteria above. This methodological approach involves several steps. First, existing state-of-the-art projects are critically reviewed to identify more advanced solutions for waste management. Second, biowaste projects are characterized by the application of multiple criteria and subcriteria. Finally, prioritized solutions are generated to elucidate the ranking of biowaste based on a hierarchical structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信