当目标导向的扫视变得更加显著性驱动时,跨扫视的目标识别整合随着扫视前的目标偏心逐渐消失

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Junhao Liang, Li Zhaoping
{"title":"当目标导向的扫视变得更加显著性驱动时,跨扫视的目标识别整合随着扫视前的目标偏心逐渐消失","authors":"Junhao Liang,&nbsp;Li Zhaoping","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bringing objects from peripheral locations to fovea via saccades facilitates their recognition. Human observers integrate pre- and post-saccadic information for recognition. This integration has only been investigated using instructed saccades to prescribed locations. Typically, the target has a fixed pre-saccadic location in an uncluttered scene and is viewed by a pre-determined post-saccadic duration. Consequently, whether trans-saccadic integration is limited or absent when the pre-saccadic target eccentricity is too large in cluttered scenes in unknown. Our study revealed this limit during visual exploration, when observers decided themselves when and to where to make their saccades. We asked thirty observers (400 trials each) to find and report as quickly as possible a target amongst 404 non-targets in an image spanning <span><math><mrow><mn>57</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>×</mo><mn>33</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span> in visual angle. We measured the target’s pre-saccadic eccentricity <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span>, the duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the fixation before the saccade, and the post-saccadic foveal viewing duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. This <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> before starting to saturate around eccentricity <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>20</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span>. Meanwhile, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased much more slowly with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> and started decreasing before <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. These observations imply the following at sufficiently large pre-saccadic eccentricities: the trans-saccadic integration ceases, target recognition relies exclusively on post-saccadic foveal vision, decision to saccade to the target relies exclusively on target saliency rather than identification. These implications should be applicable to general behavior, although <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> should depend on object and scene properties. They are consistent with the Central-peripheral Dichotomy that central and peripheral vision are specialized for seeing and looking, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trans-saccadic integration for object recognition peters out with pre-saccadic object eccentricity as target-directed saccades become more saliency-driven\",\"authors\":\"Junhao Liang,&nbsp;Li Zhaoping\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bringing objects from peripheral locations to fovea via saccades facilitates their recognition. Human observers integrate pre- and post-saccadic information for recognition. This integration has only been investigated using instructed saccades to prescribed locations. Typically, the target has a fixed pre-saccadic location in an uncluttered scene and is viewed by a pre-determined post-saccadic duration. Consequently, whether trans-saccadic integration is limited or absent when the pre-saccadic target eccentricity is too large in cluttered scenes in unknown. Our study revealed this limit during visual exploration, when observers decided themselves when and to where to make their saccades. We asked thirty observers (400 trials each) to find and report as quickly as possible a target amongst 404 non-targets in an image spanning <span><math><mrow><mn>57</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>×</mo><mn>33</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span> in visual angle. We measured the target’s pre-saccadic eccentricity <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span>, the duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the fixation before the saccade, and the post-saccadic foveal viewing duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. This <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> before starting to saturate around eccentricity <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>20</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span>. Meanwhile, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased much more slowly with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> and started decreasing before <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. These observations imply the following at sufficiently large pre-saccadic eccentricities: the trans-saccadic integration ceases, target recognition relies exclusively on post-saccadic foveal vision, decision to saccade to the target relies exclusively on target saliency rather than identification. These implications should be applicable to general behavior, although <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> should depend on object and scene properties. They are consistent with the Central-peripheral Dichotomy that central and peripheral vision are specialized for seeing and looking, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001445\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过扫视将物体从外围位置带到中央凹,有助于对其进行识别。人类观察者将跳眼前和跳眼后的信息整合起来进行识别。这种整合只能通过指示扫视到指定位置来研究。通常,目标在一个整洁的场景中有一个固定的跳前位置,并在预定的跳后持续时间内被观察。因此,在未知的杂乱场景中,当跳前目标偏心过大时,跨跳积分是否受到限制或不存在。我们的研究揭示了视觉探索过程中的这种限制,即观察者自己决定何时何地进行扫视。我们要求30名观察者(每人400次试验)在一张视角为57.3°×33.8°的图像中尽快从404个非目标中找到并报告一个目标。我们测量了被试的跳前偏心率e、跳前注视持续时间Tpre和跳后中央凹注视持续时间Tpost。在离心率ep=10°- 20°附近开始饱和之前,这个post随着e的增加而增加。同时,Tpre随e的增加缓慢,在ep之前开始下降。这些观察结果表明,在足够大的跳眼前偏心时:跨跳眼整合停止,目标识别完全依赖于跳眼后中央凹视觉,跳眼到目标的决定完全依赖于目标显著性而不是识别。这些含义应该适用于一般行为,尽管ep应该取决于对象和场景属性。它们与中央-外周视觉二分法一致,即中央视觉和外周视觉分别专门用于看和看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trans-saccadic integration for object recognition peters out with pre-saccadic object eccentricity as target-directed saccades become more saliency-driven
Bringing objects from peripheral locations to fovea via saccades facilitates their recognition. Human observers integrate pre- and post-saccadic information for recognition. This integration has only been investigated using instructed saccades to prescribed locations. Typically, the target has a fixed pre-saccadic location in an uncluttered scene and is viewed by a pre-determined post-saccadic duration. Consequently, whether trans-saccadic integration is limited or absent when the pre-saccadic target eccentricity is too large in cluttered scenes in unknown. Our study revealed this limit during visual exploration, when observers decided themselves when and to where to make their saccades. We asked thirty observers (400 trials each) to find and report as quickly as possible a target amongst 404 non-targets in an image spanning 57.3°×33.8° in visual angle. We measured the target’s pre-saccadic eccentricity e, the duration Tpre of the fixation before the saccade, and the post-saccadic foveal viewing duration Tpost. This Tpost increased with e before starting to saturate around eccentricity ep=10°20°. Meanwhile, Tpre increased much more slowly with e and started decreasing before ep. These observations imply the following at sufficiently large pre-saccadic eccentricities: the trans-saccadic integration ceases, target recognition relies exclusively on post-saccadic foveal vision, decision to saccade to the target relies exclusively on target saliency rather than identification. These implications should be applicable to general behavior, although ep should depend on object and scene properties. They are consistent with the Central-peripheral Dichotomy that central and peripheral vision are specialized for seeing and looking, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信