复垦和未复垦矿区早期开发阶段的能源和二氧化碳通量

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aysan Badraghi , Ondřej Mudrák , Jiří Kučera , Leonardo Montagnani , Jan Frouz
{"title":"复垦和未复垦矿区早期开发阶段的能源和二氧化碳通量","authors":"Aysan Badraghi ,&nbsp;Ondřej Mudrák ,&nbsp;Jiří Kučera ,&nbsp;Leonardo Montagnani ,&nbsp;Jan Frouz","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The carbon exchange in post-mining areas and the impact of various restoration practices—(i) reclaimed (alder plantation on leveled microtopography in 2019) and (ii) unreclaimed (spontaneous development on wave-like microtopography)— on carbon and energy fluxes remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted the first direct measurements of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat (LE), and sensible heat (H) using paired eddy covariance towers at both reclaimed and unreclaimed sites during the growing seasons of 2020, 2021, and 2023 in the early stage of succession in Czechia. Our novel results show that early post-coal mining sites were net sources of CO<sub>2</sub> but became carbon sinks on a monthly scale within four years, highlighting the rapid ecosystem recovery at both sites. Significant differences in NEE, gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco), and LE were observed between the two sites. Initially (2020 and 2021), the effect of alder seedlings was negligible. Differences in NEE and LE were mainly caused by higher emissions (Reco) at the unreclaimed site due to lower soil bulk density and higher runoff at the reclaimed site due to compacted soil, both influenced by heavy summer rainfall. By 2023, alder growth (GPP) became the primary factor differentiating the two sites. Climatic variables influenced fluxes similarly at both sites, although correlations were stronger at the unreclaimed site. Our findings suggest that natural succession can lead to CO<sub>2</sub> sinks comparable to alder plantations, offering a practical alternative for post-mining land restoration in Central Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100547"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy and CO2 fluxes in the early stage development of reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining areas\",\"authors\":\"Aysan Badraghi ,&nbsp;Ondřej Mudrák ,&nbsp;Jiří Kučera ,&nbsp;Leonardo Montagnani ,&nbsp;Jan Frouz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The carbon exchange in post-mining areas and the impact of various restoration practices—(i) reclaimed (alder plantation on leveled microtopography in 2019) and (ii) unreclaimed (spontaneous development on wave-like microtopography)— on carbon and energy fluxes remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted the first direct measurements of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat (LE), and sensible heat (H) using paired eddy covariance towers at both reclaimed and unreclaimed sites during the growing seasons of 2020, 2021, and 2023 in the early stage of succession in Czechia. Our novel results show that early post-coal mining sites were net sources of CO<sub>2</sub> but became carbon sinks on a monthly scale within four years, highlighting the rapid ecosystem recovery at both sites. Significant differences in NEE, gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco), and LE were observed between the two sites. Initially (2020 and 2021), the effect of alder seedlings was negligible. Differences in NEE and LE were mainly caused by higher emissions (Reco) at the unreclaimed site due to lower soil bulk density and higher runoff at the reclaimed site due to compacted soil, both influenced by heavy summer rainfall. By 2023, alder growth (GPP) became the primary factor differentiating the two sites. Climatic variables influenced fluxes similarly at both sites, although correlations were stronger at the unreclaimed site. Our findings suggest that natural succession can lead to CO<sub>2</sub> sinks comparable to alder plantations, offering a practical alternative for post-mining land restoration in Central Europe.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724002150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724002150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采矿后地区的碳交换以及各种恢复措施——(i)开垦(2019年平整微地形上的桤木人工林)和(ii)未开垦(波浪状微地形上的自发发展)——对碳和能量通量的影响仍知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们在捷克演替早期的2020年、2021年和2023年的生长季节,在填海和未填海的场地,利用配对涡动相关塔,首次直接测量了净生态系统交换(NEE)、潜热(LE)和感热(H)。我们的新研究结果表明,早期的后煤炭开采地点是二氧化碳的净来源,但在4年内每月都成为碳汇,突出了两个地点的生态系统快速恢复。NEE、gross primary production (GPP)、ecosystem respiration (Reco)和LE在两个站点之间存在显著差异。最初(2020年和2021年),桤木幼苗的影响可以忽略不计。NEE和LE的差异主要是由于未垦区土壤容重较低导致的高排放(Reco)和土壤压实导致的高径流,两者均受夏季强降雨的影响。到2023年,桤木生长(GPP)成为区分两个地点的主要因素。气候变量对两个地点的通量影响相似,但在未开垦的地点相关性更强。我们的研究结果表明,自然演替可以导致与桤木人工林相当的二氧化碳汇,为中欧采伐后的土地恢复提供了一种实用的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy and CO2 fluxes in the early stage development of reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining areas
The carbon exchange in post-mining areas and the impact of various restoration practices—(i) reclaimed (alder plantation on leveled microtopography in 2019) and (ii) unreclaimed (spontaneous development on wave-like microtopography)— on carbon and energy fluxes remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted the first direct measurements of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat (LE), and sensible heat (H) using paired eddy covariance towers at both reclaimed and unreclaimed sites during the growing seasons of 2020, 2021, and 2023 in the early stage of succession in Czechia. Our novel results show that early post-coal mining sites were net sources of CO2 but became carbon sinks on a monthly scale within four years, highlighting the rapid ecosystem recovery at both sites. Significant differences in NEE, gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco), and LE were observed between the two sites. Initially (2020 and 2021), the effect of alder seedlings was negligible. Differences in NEE and LE were mainly caused by higher emissions (Reco) at the unreclaimed site due to lower soil bulk density and higher runoff at the reclaimed site due to compacted soil, both influenced by heavy summer rainfall. By 2023, alder growth (GPP) became the primary factor differentiating the two sites. Climatic variables influenced fluxes similarly at both sites, although correlations were stronger at the unreclaimed site. Our findings suggest that natural succession can lead to CO2 sinks comparable to alder plantations, offering a practical alternative for post-mining land restoration in Central Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信