稻秆和稻壳灰作为补充胶凝材料的抗压强度和区域供应意义

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Patrick R. Cunningham , Li Wang , Somayeh Nassiri , Peter Thy , John T. Harvey , Bryan M. Jenkins , Sabbie A. Miller
{"title":"稻秆和稻壳灰作为补充胶凝材料的抗压强度和区域供应意义","authors":"Patrick R. Cunningham ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Somayeh Nassiri ,&nbsp;Peter Thy ,&nbsp;John T. Harvey ,&nbsp;Bryan M. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Sabbie A. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108024"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials\",\"authors\":\"Patrick R. Cunningham ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Somayeh Nassiri ,&nbsp;Peter Thy ,&nbsp;John T. Harvey ,&nbsp;Bryan M. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Sabbie A. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924006153\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924006153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用补充胶凝材料(SCMs)替代硅酸盐水泥(PC)是减少温室气体(GHG)排放的关键策略。考虑替代scm需要全面了解材料性能、减排潜力和区域可用性的变化。研究了四种稻壳灰(RHAs)和一种稻秆灰(RSA)替代砂浆中的PC(10%未经处理的灰和30%高炉渣;15%未经处理的灰分;或15%磨灰)。基于方差分析,在水胶比为0.59时,果蝇rhas (38.0-49.8 MPa)和RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa)的28天抗压强度与PC对照组(43.2 MPa)没有显著差异。对美国六个州的水稻生物质生产进行建模显示,RSA可以使水稻生物质灰的供应量增加三倍,但在PC需求较大的州,即加利福尼亚州和德克萨斯州,潜在的温室气体减排可能仍然很小(约1-2%)。RSA和RHA可能有望降低混凝土温室气体排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials

Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials
Substituting Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Considering alternative SCMs requires a holistic understanding of changes to material performance, emissions reduction potential, and regional availability. Four rice hull ashes (RHAs) and one rice straw ash (RSA) were evaluated to replace PC in mortars (10% untreated ash and 30% blast furnace slag; 15% untreated ash; or 15% milled ash). The 28-day compressive strengths with 0.59 water-to-binder ratio for fly-RHAs (38.0–49.8 MPa) and RSA (37.7 - 44.1 MPa) did not vary significantly from the PC control (43.2 MPa) based on an ANOVA. Modeling rice biomass generation in six U.S. states shows RSA could triple the supply of rice-biomass ash, but in states with substantial PC demand, i.e., California and Texas, the potential GHG reduction may remain small (∼1–2%). RSA and RHA may hold promise in lowering concrete GHG emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信