Henry C. Croll , Kaoru Ikuma , Say Kee Ong , Soumik Sarkar
{"title":"水资源回收设施的强化学习优化:评估奖励函数设计对智能体训练、控制优化和处理风险的影响","authors":"Henry C. Croll , Kaoru Ikuma , Say Kee Ong , Soumik Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study applied reinforcement learning (RL) optimization to the simulation of a water resource recovery facility (WRRF) to evaluate the impact of reward function design under varying effluent requirements. Several mathematical structures were evaluated for the effluent quality index (EQI) portion of the reward function for the case of current treatment requirements. Of these, a fraction-based structure was found to produce the highest level of optimization, as well as the best mix of results along an optimal risk-reward tradeoff line. The study also found that the training success rate could be tuned by changing the weight given to the EQI. Given the simplicity of the current treatment requirements, agents trained for this case showed a very clear risk-reward tradeoff. The most cost-effective agent reduced operational costs by 10.9 % compared to current operation, equivalent to yearly savings of $267,000. RL agents were also evaluated for the case of future treatment requiring nutrient removal. As the future case was more complex than the current case, relative risk was evaluated using a combination of basic indicators such as maximum effluent value and instantaneous limit exceedance, correlation matrixes to uncover state-action relationships, and challenge testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 106658"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinforcement learning optimization of a water resource recovery facility: Evaluating the impact of reward function design on agent training, control optimization, and treatment risk\",\"authors\":\"Henry C. Croll , Kaoru Ikuma , Say Kee Ong , Soumik Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study applied reinforcement learning (RL) optimization to the simulation of a water resource recovery facility (WRRF) to evaluate the impact of reward function design under varying effluent requirements. Several mathematical structures were evaluated for the effluent quality index (EQI) portion of the reward function for the case of current treatment requirements. Of these, a fraction-based structure was found to produce the highest level of optimization, as well as the best mix of results along an optimal risk-reward tradeoff line. The study also found that the training success rate could be tuned by changing the weight given to the EQI. Given the simplicity of the current treatment requirements, agents trained for this case showed a very clear risk-reward tradeoff. The most cost-effective agent reduced operational costs by 10.9 % compared to current operation, equivalent to yearly savings of $267,000. RL agents were also evaluated for the case of future treatment requiring nutrient removal. As the future case was more complex than the current case, relative risk was evaluated using a combination of basic indicators such as maximum effluent value and instantaneous limit exceedance, correlation matrixes to uncover state-action relationships, and challenge testing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424018907\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424018907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reinforcement learning optimization of a water resource recovery facility: Evaluating the impact of reward function design on agent training, control optimization, and treatment risk
This study applied reinforcement learning (RL) optimization to the simulation of a water resource recovery facility (WRRF) to evaluate the impact of reward function design under varying effluent requirements. Several mathematical structures were evaluated for the effluent quality index (EQI) portion of the reward function for the case of current treatment requirements. Of these, a fraction-based structure was found to produce the highest level of optimization, as well as the best mix of results along an optimal risk-reward tradeoff line. The study also found that the training success rate could be tuned by changing the weight given to the EQI. Given the simplicity of the current treatment requirements, agents trained for this case showed a very clear risk-reward tradeoff. The most cost-effective agent reduced operational costs by 10.9 % compared to current operation, equivalent to yearly savings of $267,000. RL agents were also evaluated for the case of future treatment requiring nutrient removal. As the future case was more complex than the current case, relative risk was evaluated using a combination of basic indicators such as maximum effluent value and instantaneous limit exceedance, correlation matrixes to uncover state-action relationships, and challenge testing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies