改善甲状腺转蛋白淀粉样变患者基线风险分层的心肌工作评估

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ana Moya , Elayne Kelen de Oliveira , Monika Beles , Dimitri Buytaert , Marc Goethals , Riet Dierckx , Jeroen Dauw , Jozef Bartunek , Ward A. Heggermont , Marc Vanderheyden
{"title":"改善甲状腺转蛋白淀粉样变患者基线风险分层的心肌工作评估","authors":"Ana Moya ,&nbsp;Elayne Kelen de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Monika Beles ,&nbsp;Dimitri Buytaert ,&nbsp;Marc Goethals ,&nbsp;Riet Dierckx ,&nbsp;Jeroen Dauw ,&nbsp;Jozef Bartunek ,&nbsp;Ward A. Heggermont ,&nbsp;Marc Vanderheyden","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is an often underdiagnosed and potentially fatal disorder associated with poor survival. The National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging system, based on NT-proBNP level and eGFR value, discriminates patients according to survival rates. However, NAC stage II involves a heterogenous group of patients with variable prognosis. This retrospective single-center study was set up to explore the potential role of myocardial work (MW) analysis to enhance risk stratification of ATTR patients prior to therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>37 patients diagnosed with ATTR between March 2021 and August 2023 were included. Baseline NT-proBNP and eGFR values were collected and LVEF, GLS and MW parameters were obtained from stored echocardiographic images. Patients were categorized per NAC stage (16 NAC I, 13 NAC II and 8 NAC III). Whereas the survival rate in NAC II and NAC III was significantly worse than in NAC I (p = 0.031 and p = 0.045 respectively), no significant difference was found between NAC II and III. In the ROC analysis, GCW proved to be the best survival predictor (AUC: 0.7) with optimal cut-off value 1294 mmHg%. Patients from NAC stage II were re-stratified according to GCW cut-off into HIGH RISK together with patients from NAC III or LOW RISK together with patients from NAC I. Patients in the HIGH RISK group exhibited a significantly worse prognosis with only 40 % survival at 2 years follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results demonstrate the advantages of incorporating MW analysis, particularly the use of a GCW cut-off, in the baseline risk stratification of ATTR patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial work assessment to improve baseline risk stratification in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis\",\"authors\":\"Ana Moya ,&nbsp;Elayne Kelen de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Monika Beles ,&nbsp;Dimitri Buytaert ,&nbsp;Marc Goethals ,&nbsp;Riet Dierckx ,&nbsp;Jeroen Dauw ,&nbsp;Jozef Bartunek ,&nbsp;Ward A. Heggermont ,&nbsp;Marc Vanderheyden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is an often underdiagnosed and potentially fatal disorder associated with poor survival. The National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging system, based on NT-proBNP level and eGFR value, discriminates patients according to survival rates. However, NAC stage II involves a heterogenous group of patients with variable prognosis. This retrospective single-center study was set up to explore the potential role of myocardial work (MW) analysis to enhance risk stratification of ATTR patients prior to therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>37 patients diagnosed with ATTR between March 2021 and August 2023 were included. Baseline NT-proBNP and eGFR values were collected and LVEF, GLS and MW parameters were obtained from stored echocardiographic images. Patients were categorized per NAC stage (16 NAC I, 13 NAC II and 8 NAC III). Whereas the survival rate in NAC II and NAC III was significantly worse than in NAC I (p = 0.031 and p = 0.045 respectively), no significant difference was found between NAC II and III. In the ROC analysis, GCW proved to be the best survival predictor (AUC: 0.7) with optimal cut-off value 1294 mmHg%. Patients from NAC stage II were re-stratified according to GCW cut-off into HIGH RISK together with patients from NAC III or LOW RISK together with patients from NAC I. Patients in the HIGH RISK group exhibited a significantly worse prognosis with only 40 % survival at 2 years follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results demonstrate the advantages of incorporating MW analysis, particularly the use of a GCW cut-off, in the baseline risk stratification of ATTR patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724002173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724002173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏转甲状腺素(ATTR)淀粉样变是一种常被误诊且潜在致命的疾病,与生存率低相关。国家淀粉样变性中心(NAC)分期系统,基于NT-proBNP水平和eGFR值,根据生存率区分患者。然而,NAC II期涉及不同预后的异质组患者。本回顾性单中心研究旨在探讨心肌功(MW)分析在治疗前加强ATTR患者风险分层中的潜在作用。方法和结果纳入2021年3月至2023年8月诊断为ATTR的37例患者。收集基线NT-proBNP和eGFR值,并从存储的超声心动图中获取LVEF、GLS和MW参数。患者按NAC分期进行分类(16例NAC I, 13例NAC II和8例NAC III)。NAC II和NAC III的生存率明显低于NAC I (p = 0.031和p = 0.045),而NAC II和NAC III之间无显著差异。在ROC分析中,GCW被证明是最好的生存预测因子(AUC: 0.7),最佳临界值为1294 mmHg%。根据GCW分割线,将NAC II期患者重新分层,分为高风险组和NAC III期患者,或低风险组和NAC i期患者。高风险组患者预后明显较差,随访2年生存率仅为40%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在ATTR患者的基线风险分层中,结合MW分析,特别是使用GCW截止,具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myocardial work assessment to improve baseline risk stratification in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis

Background

Cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is an often underdiagnosed and potentially fatal disorder associated with poor survival. The National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging system, based on NT-proBNP level and eGFR value, discriminates patients according to survival rates. However, NAC stage II involves a heterogenous group of patients with variable prognosis. This retrospective single-center study was set up to explore the potential role of myocardial work (MW) analysis to enhance risk stratification of ATTR patients prior to therapy.

Methods and Results

37 patients diagnosed with ATTR between March 2021 and August 2023 were included. Baseline NT-proBNP and eGFR values were collected and LVEF, GLS and MW parameters were obtained from stored echocardiographic images. Patients were categorized per NAC stage (16 NAC I, 13 NAC II and 8 NAC III). Whereas the survival rate in NAC II and NAC III was significantly worse than in NAC I (p = 0.031 and p = 0.045 respectively), no significant difference was found between NAC II and III. In the ROC analysis, GCW proved to be the best survival predictor (AUC: 0.7) with optimal cut-off value 1294 mmHg%. Patients from NAC stage II were re-stratified according to GCW cut-off into HIGH RISK together with patients from NAC III or LOW RISK together with patients from NAC I. Patients in the HIGH RISK group exhibited a significantly worse prognosis with only 40 % survival at 2 years follow-up.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate the advantages of incorporating MW analysis, particularly the use of a GCW cut-off, in the baseline risk stratification of ATTR patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信