血液科医生对预先医疗指示的看法,法国全国横断面调查--ADORE-H 研究。

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
K Serey, A Cambriel, Adrien Pollina-Bachellerie, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Carole Bouleuc, Laure Ladrat, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Francois Philippart
{"title":"血液科医生对预先医疗指示的看法,法国全国横断面调查--ADORE-H 研究。","authors":"K Serey, A Cambriel, Adrien Pollina-Bachellerie, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Carole Bouleuc, Laure Ladrat, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Francois Philippart","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01146-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The onset of hematological malignancies can lead to acute and critical situations. It can also result in adverse outcome despite the significant advancements made in their therapeutic management. In this context, advance care planning and, in particular, advance directives (AD) play an essential role. However, the use of AD in patients with malignant hematological conditions remains very rare.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the perception of AD by hematologists. We conducted a national online survey in France. All hematologist working in a hospital setting and treating malignant hemopathies were solicited. The questionnaire covered five areas: personal perception of AD; assistance in writing AD; patient information about AD; use of ADs; and demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>318 hematologists (33.7% of the whole population), working in 103 different centers across France participated in the study. 72.6% (n = 231) of the respondents believed that AD could be beneficial for patient's care. Only 32.7% talked about AD with their patients on a regular basis. The lack of utilization was correlated with the fear of creating anxiety for the patient (64.9%; n = 172) or for relatives (30.9%; n = 80), as well as the belief that AD were deemed inappropriate for their patients (57.8%; n = 145). 19.5% (n = 62) of responding hematologist offered their assistance to patients in writing AD. This proportion was higher in physicians who had previously worked in palliative care unit (35,6% vs. 16,8%, p = 0,0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the surveyed hematologist hold a positive opinion about AD. However, only a few discuss the matter with their patients. The fear of consequences for patients and relatives, particularly anxiety, remains the primary barrier to providing information about AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hematologists' perspective on advance directives, a French national cross-sectional survey - the ADORE-H study.\",\"authors\":\"K Serey, A Cambriel, Adrien Pollina-Bachellerie, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Carole Bouleuc, Laure Ladrat, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Francois Philippart\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-024-01146-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The onset of hematological malignancies can lead to acute and critical situations. It can also result in adverse outcome despite the significant advancements made in their therapeutic management. In this context, advance care planning and, in particular, advance directives (AD) play an essential role. However, the use of AD in patients with malignant hematological conditions remains very rare.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the perception of AD by hematologists. We conducted a national online survey in France. All hematologist working in a hospital setting and treating malignant hemopathies were solicited. The questionnaire covered five areas: personal perception of AD; assistance in writing AD; patient information about AD; use of ADs; and demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>318 hematologists (33.7% of the whole population), working in 103 different centers across France participated in the study. 72.6% (n = 231) of the respondents believed that AD could be beneficial for patient's care. Only 32.7% talked about AD with their patients on a regular basis. The lack of utilization was correlated with the fear of creating anxiety for the patient (64.9%; n = 172) or for relatives (30.9%; n = 80), as well as the belief that AD were deemed inappropriate for their patients (57.8%; n = 145). 19.5% (n = 62) of responding hematologist offered their assistance to patients in writing AD. This proportion was higher in physicians who had previously worked in palliative care unit (35,6% vs. 16,8%, p = 0,0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the surveyed hematologist hold a positive opinion about AD. However, only a few discuss the matter with their patients. The fear of consequences for patients and relatives, particularly anxiety, remains the primary barrier to providing information about AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01146-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01146-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液恶性肿瘤的发病可导致急危重症。尽管在血液恶性肿瘤的治疗管理方面取得了重大进展,但仍可能导致不良后果。在这种情况下,预先护理计划,尤其是预先指示(AD)发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,在恶性血液病患者中使用预先医疗指示的情况仍然非常罕见:我们的目的是评估血液科医生对预先医疗指示的认识。我们在法国开展了一项全国性在线调查。调查对象为所有在医院工作并治疗恶性血液病的血液科医生。调查问卷涵盖五个方面:个人对AD的认知;协助撰写AD;患者对AD的了解;AD的使用;人口统计学数据:共有 318 名血液学专家(占总人数的 33.7%)参与了这项研究,他们分别在法国 103 个不同的中心工作。72.6%(n = 231)的受访者认为,AD 可以为患者的治疗带来益处。只有 32.7% 的受访者经常与病人谈论 AD。不使用 AD 与担心给病人(64.9%;n = 172)或亲属(30.9%;n = 80)带来焦虑以及认为 AD 不适合病人(57.8%;n = 145)有关。19.5%(n = 62)的受访血液科医生会协助患者撰写 AD。这一比例在曾在姑息治疗病房工作过的医生中更高(35.6% vs. 16.8%,p = 0.0004):结论:大多数接受调查的血液科医生对AD持积极态度。然而,只有少数人与他们的病人讨论过这一问题。病人和亲属对后果的恐惧,尤其是焦虑,仍然是提供 AD 信息的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hematologists' perspective on advance directives, a French national cross-sectional survey - the ADORE-H study.

Background: The onset of hematological malignancies can lead to acute and critical situations. It can also result in adverse outcome despite the significant advancements made in their therapeutic management. In this context, advance care planning and, in particular, advance directives (AD) play an essential role. However, the use of AD in patients with malignant hematological conditions remains very rare.

Material & methods: The aim was to evaluate the perception of AD by hematologists. We conducted a national online survey in France. All hematologist working in a hospital setting and treating malignant hemopathies were solicited. The questionnaire covered five areas: personal perception of AD; assistance in writing AD; patient information about AD; use of ADs; and demographic data.

Results: 318 hematologists (33.7% of the whole population), working in 103 different centers across France participated in the study. 72.6% (n = 231) of the respondents believed that AD could be beneficial for patient's care. Only 32.7% talked about AD with their patients on a regular basis. The lack of utilization was correlated with the fear of creating anxiety for the patient (64.9%; n = 172) or for relatives (30.9%; n = 80), as well as the belief that AD were deemed inappropriate for their patients (57.8%; n = 145). 19.5% (n = 62) of responding hematologist offered their assistance to patients in writing AD. This proportion was higher in physicians who had previously worked in palliative care unit (35,6% vs. 16,8%, p = 0,0004).

Conclusion: The majority of the surveyed hematologist hold a positive opinion about AD. However, only a few discuss the matter with their patients. The fear of consequences for patients and relatives, particularly anxiety, remains the primary barrier to providing information about AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信