{"title":"从急性黏膜反应角度看高剂量率间质近距离放射疗法作为移动性舌癌单一疗法的有效性","authors":"Hironori Akiyama, Ken Yoshida, Tadayuki Kotsuma, Koji Masui, Tadashi Takenaka, Manabu Kano, Fumiaki Isohashi, Yuji Seo, Taiju Shimbo, Naoya Murakami, Yui Mori, Shinya Kotaki, Hitoshi Yoshimoto, Eiichi Tanaka, Nikolaos Tselis, Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy, Hideya Yamazaki, Satoaki Nakamura, Noboru Tanigawa, Kimishige Shimizutani, Kazuhiko Ogawa, Yoshiko Ariji","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7112003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study investigated the acute mucosal reaction (AMR) after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at 54 Gy/9 fractions (HDR54) as monotherapy administered twice a day for tongue cancer in 13 patients, and attempted to validate HDR54 by comparing the AMR with that of our previously reported HDR at 60 Gy/10 fractions (HDR60), and low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at approximately 70 Gy (LDR70).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer/ Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system with modifications (score: 1-4.5) was used to evaluate AMR. The time courses of the AMR scores of HDR54 were recorded. The time courses of the AMR of HDR54, HDR 60, and LDR70 were each divided into 6 phases and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of cases in the HDR54 group with a lower score (1-2) at the time of the initial response was significantly higher (12 cases) than those in the HDR60 group (1 case) (p=0.0077) and LDR70 group (1 case) (p=0.0077). In the HDR54 group, the time between the end of treatment and appearance of the first response was significantly longer (median: 3 days) than those in the HDR60 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001) and LDR70 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the maximum score, its duration, or other parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that the AMR of HDR54 started later and was gentler and more easily tolerated than the other two methods, suggesting the validity of HDR54 in terms of AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Mobile Tongue Cancer in Terms of the Acute Mucosal Reaction.\",\"authors\":\"Hironori Akiyama, Ken Yoshida, Tadayuki Kotsuma, Koji Masui, Tadashi Takenaka, Manabu Kano, Fumiaki Isohashi, Yuji Seo, Taiju Shimbo, Naoya Murakami, Yui Mori, Shinya Kotaki, Hitoshi Yoshimoto, Eiichi Tanaka, Nikolaos Tselis, Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy, Hideya Yamazaki, Satoaki Nakamura, Noboru Tanigawa, Kimishige Shimizutani, Kazuhiko Ogawa, Yoshiko Ariji\",\"doi\":\"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7112003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study investigated the acute mucosal reaction (AMR) after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at 54 Gy/9 fractions (HDR54) as monotherapy administered twice a day for tongue cancer in 13 patients, and attempted to validate HDR54 by comparing the AMR with that of our previously reported HDR at 60 Gy/10 fractions (HDR60), and low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at approximately 70 Gy (LDR70).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer/ Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system with modifications (score: 1-4.5) was used to evaluate AMR. The time courses of the AMR scores of HDR54 were recorded. The time courses of the AMR of HDR54, HDR 60, and LDR70 were each divided into 6 phases and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of cases in the HDR54 group with a lower score (1-2) at the time of the initial response was significantly higher (12 cases) than those in the HDR60 group (1 case) (p=0.0077) and LDR70 group (1 case) (p=0.0077). In the HDR54 group, the time between the end of treatment and appearance of the first response was significantly longer (median: 3 days) than those in the HDR60 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001) and LDR70 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the maximum score, its duration, or other parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that the AMR of HDR54 started later and was gentler and more easily tolerated than the other two methods, suggesting the validity of HDR54 in terms of AMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7112003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7112003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究调查了13例舌癌患者在接受54 Gy/9分次高剂量率间质近距离放射治疗(HDR54)后的急性粘膜反应(AMR),并尝试将AMR与我们之前报道的60 Gy/10分次高剂量率间质近距离放射治疗(HDR60)和约70 Gy的低剂量率间质近距离放射治疗(LDR70)进行比较,以验证HDR54的效果:方法:采用欧洲癌症治疗研究组织/肿瘤放疗组的评分系统进行 AMR 评估(评分:1-4.5)。记录了 HDR54 的 AMR 评分的时间进程。将 HDR54、HDR 60 和 LDR70 的 AMR 时间进程各分为 6 个阶段并进行比较:结果:HDR54 组初次反应时得分较低(1-2 分)的病例数(12 例)明显高于 HDR60 组(1 例)(P=0.0077)和 LDR70 组(1 例)(P=0.0077)。在 HDR54 组中,从治疗结束到出现首次反应的时间(中位数:3 天)明显长于 HDR60 组(中位数:1 天)(p 结论:结果表明,与其他两种方法相比,HDR54 的 AMR 开始得更晚,更温和,更容易耐受,这表明 HDR54 在 AMR 方面是有效的。
Validity of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Mobile Tongue Cancer in Terms of the Acute Mucosal Reaction.
Background: The present study investigated the acute mucosal reaction (AMR) after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at 54 Gy/9 fractions (HDR54) as monotherapy administered twice a day for tongue cancer in 13 patients, and attempted to validate HDR54 by comparing the AMR with that of our previously reported HDR at 60 Gy/10 fractions (HDR60), and low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy at approximately 70 Gy (LDR70).
Methods: The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer/ Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system with modifications (score: 1-4.5) was used to evaluate AMR. The time courses of the AMR scores of HDR54 were recorded. The time courses of the AMR of HDR54, HDR 60, and LDR70 were each divided into 6 phases and compared.
Results: The number of cases in the HDR54 group with a lower score (1-2) at the time of the initial response was significantly higher (12 cases) than those in the HDR60 group (1 case) (p=0.0077) and LDR70 group (1 case) (p=0.0077). In the HDR54 group, the time between the end of treatment and appearance of the first response was significantly longer (median: 3 days) than those in the HDR60 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001) and LDR70 group (median: 1 day) (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the maximum score, its duration, or other parameters.
Conclusions: The results indicated that the AMR of HDR54 started later and was gentler and more easily tolerated than the other two methods, suggesting the validity of HDR54 in terms of AMR.