根据结肠转运试验识别便秘患者的功能性排便障碍:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xiaoyang Ren, Xiaoni Yan, Jiao Zhu, Shuixiang He, Yan Yin
{"title":"根据结肠转运试验识别便秘患者的功能性排便障碍:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Xiaoyang Ren, Xiaoni Yan, Jiao Zhu, Shuixiang He, Yan Yin","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2434637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of colonic transit test (CTT) in cases of constipation associated with functional defecation disorders (FDD) within the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 202 patients diagnosed with functional constipation, who underwent CTT, high-resolution anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test. Participants were categorized based on the Rome IV criteria, comprising 103 patients with FDD and 99 without. The study examined the symptomatic characteristics of both groups and assessed the diagnostic utility of CTT in identifying constipation with FDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predominant symptom reported among individuals with chronic functional constipation was excessive straining, observed in 69.3% of cases. The incidence of hard stool passage and feelings of incomplete evacuation were significantly greater in the FDD group compared to the non-FDD group (47.6% vs. 31.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.018 and 50.5% vs. 25.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). The presence of three or more rectosigmoid (RS) residual markers and a transit index of 40% or greater demonstrated moderate diagnostic value for FDD, characterized by low sensitivity(44.7% and 47.6%) but high specificity(76.8% and 75.8%). The RS residual markers were effective in differentiating between FDD and normal transit constipation, but not effectively distinguish between FDD and slow transit constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of RS residue serves primarily as an exclusionary criterion for diagnosing FDD. In cases of slow transit constipation, but not normal transit constipation, it is imperative to conduct multiple kinetic assessments to accurately differentiate between FDD and other types of constipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of functional defecation disorder in patients with constipation based on colonic transit test: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyang Ren, Xiaoni Yan, Jiao Zhu, Shuixiang He, Yan Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2024.2434637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of colonic transit test (CTT) in cases of constipation associated with functional defecation disorders (FDD) within the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 202 patients diagnosed with functional constipation, who underwent CTT, high-resolution anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test. Participants were categorized based on the Rome IV criteria, comprising 103 patients with FDD and 99 without. The study examined the symptomatic characteristics of both groups and assessed the diagnostic utility of CTT in identifying constipation with FDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predominant symptom reported among individuals with chronic functional constipation was excessive straining, observed in 69.3% of cases. The incidence of hard stool passage and feelings of incomplete evacuation were significantly greater in the FDD group compared to the non-FDD group (47.6% vs. 31.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.018 and 50.5% vs. 25.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). The presence of three or more rectosigmoid (RS) residual markers and a transit index of 40% or greater demonstrated moderate diagnostic value for FDD, characterized by low sensitivity(44.7% and 47.6%) but high specificity(76.8% and 75.8%). The RS residual markers were effective in differentiating between FDD and normal transit constipation, but not effectively distinguish between FDD and slow transit constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of RS residue serves primarily as an exclusionary criterion for diagnosing FDD. In cases of slow transit constipation, but not normal transit constipation, it is imperative to conduct multiple kinetic assessments to accurately differentiate between FDD and other types of constipation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2434637\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2434637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估结肠转运试验(CTT)对中国人功能性排便障碍性便秘的诊断效果:本研究旨在评估结肠转运试验(CTT)对中国人群中伴有功能性排便障碍(FDD)的便秘病例的诊断效果:方法:对202名被诊断为功能性便秘的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者接受了CTT、高分辨率肛门直肠测压和气球排出试验。根据罗马IV标准对参与者进行了分类,其中包括103名功能性便秘患者和99名非功能性便秘患者。研究检查了两组患者的症状特征,并评估了 CTT 在识别 FDD 便秘方面的诊断效用:结果:慢性功能性便秘患者的主要症状是过度用力,占 69.3%。与非功能性便秘组相比,功能性便秘组大便排出困难和排便不尽的发生率明显更高(分别为 47.6% 对 31.3%,p = 0.018 和 50.5% 对 25.3%,p = 0.001)。三个或更多直肠乙状结肠(RS)残留标记物的存在以及转运指数达到或超过 40% 显示了 FDD 的中等诊断价值,其特点是敏感性低(44.7% 和 47.6%),但特异性高(76.8% 和 75.8%)。RS残留标记物能有效区分FDD和正常转运期便秘,但不能有效区分FDD和慢转运期便秘:结论:RS残留物的存在主要作为诊断FDD的排除标准。对于慢传输型便秘,而非正常传输型便秘,必须进行多种动力学评估,以准确区分 FDD 和其他类型的便秘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of functional defecation disorder in patients with constipation based on colonic transit test: a retrospective study.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of colonic transit test (CTT) in cases of constipation associated with functional defecation disorders (FDD) within the Chinese population.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 202 patients diagnosed with functional constipation, who underwent CTT, high-resolution anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test. Participants were categorized based on the Rome IV criteria, comprising 103 patients with FDD and 99 without. The study examined the symptomatic characteristics of both groups and assessed the diagnostic utility of CTT in identifying constipation with FDD.

Results: The predominant symptom reported among individuals with chronic functional constipation was excessive straining, observed in 69.3% of cases. The incidence of hard stool passage and feelings of incomplete evacuation were significantly greater in the FDD group compared to the non-FDD group (47.6% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.018 and 50.5% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.001, respectively). The presence of three or more rectosigmoid (RS) residual markers and a transit index of 40% or greater demonstrated moderate diagnostic value for FDD, characterized by low sensitivity(44.7% and 47.6%) but high specificity(76.8% and 75.8%). The RS residual markers were effective in differentiating between FDD and normal transit constipation, but not effectively distinguish between FDD and slow transit constipation.

Conclusions: The presence of RS residue serves primarily as an exclusionary criterion for diagnosing FDD. In cases of slow transit constipation, but not normal transit constipation, it is imperative to conduct multiple kinetic assessments to accurately differentiate between FDD and other types of constipation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信