巴西市政当局的药品筹资:谁的责任?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2024057005565
Wendell Rodrigues Oliveira da Silva, Rodrigo Fonseca Lima, Ivanessa Thaiane do Nascimento Cavalcanti, Rafael Santos Santana, Silvana Nair Leite
{"title":"巴西市政当局的药品筹资:谁的责任?","authors":"Wendell Rodrigues Oliveira da Silva, Rodrigo Fonseca Lima, Ivanessa Thaiane do Nascimento Cavalcanti, Rafael Santos Santana, Silvana Nair Leite","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024057005565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the investments made in medicines by the federated entities and the asymmetries in these investments from 2016 to 2020, which may have an impact on the supply of and access to these medicines in the SUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an exploratory, retrospective study to identify who are the main entities responsible for investment in Primary Care medicines in municipalities, the evolution, counterparts, and regional differences of this investment between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amounts spent on medicines by Brazilian municipalities were higher than the contribution to the CBAF from the MS or the MS + State in all the years analyzed. The average percentages of federal funds transferred and municipal spending varied according to the region of Brazil. The average per capita amount invested in medicines by municipalities increased between 2016 and 2020 (deflation applied), with a greater impact for municipalities with lower MHDI. The Farmácia Popular program mainly reaches municipalities with the largest populations and the highest MHDI and is therefore not enough to address the inequalities in access pointed out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been a widening of inequalities in the capacity of municipalities to ensure access to medicines, especially among the most vulnerable municipalities, accumulating even more risks of illnesses and deaths from primary care-sensitive diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"58 ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The financing of medicines in Brazilian municipalities: whose responsibility is it?\",\"authors\":\"Wendell Rodrigues Oliveira da Silva, Rodrigo Fonseca Lima, Ivanessa Thaiane do Nascimento Cavalcanti, Rafael Santos Santana, Silvana Nair Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024057005565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the investments made in medicines by the federated entities and the asymmetries in these investments from 2016 to 2020, which may have an impact on the supply of and access to these medicines in the SUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an exploratory, retrospective study to identify who are the main entities responsible for investment in Primary Care medicines in municipalities, the evolution, counterparts, and regional differences of this investment between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amounts spent on medicines by Brazilian municipalities were higher than the contribution to the CBAF from the MS or the MS + State in all the years analyzed. The average percentages of federal funds transferred and municipal spending varied according to the region of Brazil. The average per capita amount invested in medicines by municipalities increased between 2016 and 2020 (deflation applied), with a greater impact for municipalities with lower MHDI. The Farmácia Popular program mainly reaches municipalities with the largest populations and the highest MHDI and is therefore not enough to address the inequalities in access pointed out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been a widening of inequalities in the capacity of municipalities to ensure access to medicines, especially among the most vulnerable municipalities, accumulating even more risks of illnesses and deaths from primary care-sensitive diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024057005565\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024057005565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析联邦实体对药品的投资情况,以及 2016 年至 2020 年期间这些投资的不对称情况,这可能会对统一卫生系统中这些药品的供应和获取产生影响:这是一项探索性、回顾性研究,旨在确定谁是负责各市初级保健药品投资的主要实体,以及 2016 年至 2020 年间该投资的演变、对应方和地区差异:结果:在所有分析年份中,巴西各市镇在药品方面的支出均高于各市镇或市镇+州对中央预算内基金的贡献。联邦拨款和市政支出的平均比例因巴西地区而异。2016 年至 2020 年间,各市在药品方面的人均投资额有所增长(适用通货紧缩),对死亡率较低的市的影响更大。Farmácia Popular 计划主要覆盖人口最多、MHDI 最高的城市,因此不足以解决所指出的在获取药品方面的不平等问题:结论:各城市在确保获得药品的能力方面存在着不平等现象,尤其是在最脆弱的城市中,这种不平等现象在不断扩大,从而增加了因初级保健敏感疾病而患病和死亡的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The financing of medicines in Brazilian municipalities: whose responsibility is it?

Objective: To analyze the investments made in medicines by the federated entities and the asymmetries in these investments from 2016 to 2020, which may have an impact on the supply of and access to these medicines in the SUS.

Methods: This is an exploratory, retrospective study to identify who are the main entities responsible for investment in Primary Care medicines in municipalities, the evolution, counterparts, and regional differences of this investment between 2016 and 2020.

Results: The amounts spent on medicines by Brazilian municipalities were higher than the contribution to the CBAF from the MS or the MS + State in all the years analyzed. The average percentages of federal funds transferred and municipal spending varied according to the region of Brazil. The average per capita amount invested in medicines by municipalities increased between 2016 and 2020 (deflation applied), with a greater impact for municipalities with lower MHDI. The Farmácia Popular program mainly reaches municipalities with the largest populations and the highest MHDI and is therefore not enough to address the inequalities in access pointed out.

Conclusions: There has been a widening of inequalities in the capacity of municipalities to ensure access to medicines, especially among the most vulnerable municipalities, accumulating even more risks of illnesses and deaths from primary care-sensitive diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信