使用 AGREE II 工具评估不同收入环境下高血压指南质量的差异。

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1
Richu Philip, Carolina Janssen, Arun Jose, Thomas Beaney, Jonathan Clarke
{"title":"使用 AGREE II 工具评估不同收入环境下高血压指南质量的差异。","authors":"Richu Philip, Carolina Janssen, Arun Jose, Thomas Beaney, Jonathan Clarke","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension affects over one billion people worldwide, posing a significant global health burden. Clinical practice guidelines could play a key role in guiding healthcare providers in improving hypertension management. However, how the quality of hypertension CPGs differs across country income settings is not well understood. This study aims to explore variation in the quality of hypertension CPGs, comparing low-, middle-, and high-income countries, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline and grey literature search was conducted to identify hypertension CPGs in English from every country from January 2012 to September 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed and scored each CPG against the AGREE II tool. Results were described and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for statistically significant difference in the domain scores across country income groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three CPGs were included for analysis from across income settings. Guidelines from HICs scored higher in four out of the six domains. The highest scoring domain was 4: \"clarity and presentation\" (median score 83%), the lowest scoring was domain 6 \"editorial independence\" (median score 0%). Statistically significant differences between income settings were observed for domain 3 \"rigour of development\" (p <0.001), domain 4 \"clarity and presentation\" (p = 0.03) and domain 6 \"editorial independence\" (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst some variation exists in guideline quality across country income levels, the greatest degree of variation exists across the domains of the AGREE II tool. Global efforts to improve the quality of hypertension guidelines should focus on the transparent statement of editorial independence of guideline committees and apply rigorous replicable methods in the authoring of guidelines. Establishing national and international communities of practice to collaborate across income settings may reduce duplication of resource, allow for shared learning and promote the development of high-quality hypertension CPGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of variation in quality of hypertension guidelines across income settings using the AGREE II tool.\",\"authors\":\"Richu Philip, Carolina Janssen, Arun Jose, Thomas Beaney, Jonathan Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension affects over one billion people worldwide, posing a significant global health burden. Clinical practice guidelines could play a key role in guiding healthcare providers in improving hypertension management. However, how the quality of hypertension CPGs differs across country income settings is not well understood. This study aims to explore variation in the quality of hypertension CPGs, comparing low-, middle-, and high-income countries, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline and grey literature search was conducted to identify hypertension CPGs in English from every country from January 2012 to September 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed and scored each CPG against the AGREE II tool. Results were described and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for statistically significant difference in the domain scores across country income groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three CPGs were included for analysis from across income settings. Guidelines from HICs scored higher in four out of the six domains. The highest scoring domain was 4: \\\"clarity and presentation\\\" (median score 83%), the lowest scoring was domain 6 \\\"editorial independence\\\" (median score 0%). Statistically significant differences between income settings were observed for domain 3 \\\"rigour of development\\\" (p <0.001), domain 4 \\\"clarity and presentation\\\" (p = 0.03) and domain 6 \\\"editorial independence\\\" (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst some variation exists in guideline quality across country income levels, the greatest degree of variation exists across the domains of the AGREE II tool. Global efforts to improve the quality of hypertension guidelines should focus on the transparent statement of editorial independence of guideline committees and apply rigorous replicable methods in the authoring of guidelines. Establishing national and international communities of practice to collaborate across income settings may reduce duplication of resource, allow for shared learning and promote the development of high-quality hypertension CPGs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599801/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界有超过 10 亿人受到高血压的影响,给全球健康造成了巨大负担。临床实践指南可在指导医疗服务提供者改善高血压管理方面发挥关键作用。然而,人们对不同国家收入背景下高血压临床实践指南的质量有何差异还不甚了解。本研究旨在使用研究与评估指南评估(AGREE)II 工具,比较低收入、中等收入和高收入国家,探索高血压 CPGs 的质量差异:对 Medline 和灰色文献进行检索,以确定 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间各国的高血压 CPGs(英文)。两名审稿人根据 AGREE II 工具对每份 CPG 进行独立评估和评分。对结果进行了描述,并使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法检验了不同国家收入组别的领域得分是否存在显著的统计学差异:结果:共纳入 43 份来自不同收入背景的 CPG 进行分析。高收入国家的指南在六个领域中的四个领域得分较高。得分最高的领域是 4:"清晰度和表述"(中位数得分 83%),得分最低的领域是 6:"编辑独立性"(中位数得分 0%)。在领域 3 "开发的严谨性 "方面,不同收入环境之间存在明显的统计学差异(p 结论):虽然不同国家收入水平的指南质量存在一定差异,但 AGREE II 工具各领域的差异程度最大。提高高血压指南质量的全球努力应侧重于指南委员会编辑独立性的透明声明,并在指南撰写过程中采用严格的可复制方法。建立国家和国际实践社区,在不同收入背景下开展合作,可减少资源重复,实现共同学习,促进高质量高血压国家方案指南的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of variation in quality of hypertension guidelines across income settings using the AGREE II tool.

Background: Hypertension affects over one billion people worldwide, posing a significant global health burden. Clinical practice guidelines could play a key role in guiding healthcare providers in improving hypertension management. However, how the quality of hypertension CPGs differs across country income settings is not well understood. This study aims to explore variation in the quality of hypertension CPGs, comparing low-, middle-, and high-income countries, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

Methods: A Medline and grey literature search was conducted to identify hypertension CPGs in English from every country from January 2012 to September 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed and scored each CPG against the AGREE II tool. Results were described and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for statistically significant difference in the domain scores across country income groups.

Results: Forty-three CPGs were included for analysis from across income settings. Guidelines from HICs scored higher in four out of the six domains. The highest scoring domain was 4: "clarity and presentation" (median score 83%), the lowest scoring was domain 6 "editorial independence" (median score 0%). Statistically significant differences between income settings were observed for domain 3 "rigour of development" (p <0.001), domain 4 "clarity and presentation" (p = 0.03) and domain 6 "editorial independence" (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Whilst some variation exists in guideline quality across country income levels, the greatest degree of variation exists across the domains of the AGREE II tool. Global efforts to improve the quality of hypertension guidelines should focus on the transparent statement of editorial independence of guideline committees and apply rigorous replicable methods in the authoring of guidelines. Establishing national and international communities of practice to collaborate across income settings may reduce duplication of resource, allow for shared learning and promote the development of high-quality hypertension CPGs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信