健康受试者对吸入甘露醇的咳嗽反应

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00755-6
Hanna M Nurmi, Anne M Lätti, Heikki O Koskela
{"title":"健康受试者对吸入甘露醇的咳嗽反应","authors":"Hanna M Nurmi, Anne M Lätti, Heikki O Koskela","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00755-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inhaled mannitol induces bronchoconstriction and cough. This study aimed to describe the cough response to mannitol among healthy adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>125 healthy subjects (aged 18-82 years, 52% females, 50% skin prick test positive) underwent a mannitol test. The coughs were recorded both simultaneously and afterwards from video recordings by two researchers. Three indices were evaluated: The cumulative number of coughs per cumulative dose of mannitol (CDR), cumulative provocative dose of mannitol to cause at least 5 coughs, and the maximal number of coughs provoked by any single mannitol dose. The test was repeated in 26 subjects after 3-7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDR showed the best repeatability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.829. Gender was the only characteristics that associated with the cough response: The median CDR was 2.53 (interquartile range 0.45-7.01) coughs/100 mg among females and 0.787 (0.0-3.29) coughs/100 mg among males (p = 0.002). The interquartile range upper limits were defined as the cut-off limits for a normal response. The threshold for a statistically significant change in CDR was 6.26 coughs/100 mg. There was a close correlation between simultaneous- and video-assessed CDR (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.985).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females cough more than males in response to mannitol. CDR is the most suitable index to describe the cough responsiveness. The repeatability of the response is good. Video recording of the coughs is not mandatory. The cut-off limits for a normal cough response to mannitol were provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cough Response to Inhaled Mannitol in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Hanna M Nurmi, Anne M Lätti, Heikki O Koskela\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00408-024-00755-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inhaled mannitol induces bronchoconstriction and cough. This study aimed to describe the cough response to mannitol among healthy adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>125 healthy subjects (aged 18-82 years, 52% females, 50% skin prick test positive) underwent a mannitol test. The coughs were recorded both simultaneously and afterwards from video recordings by two researchers. Three indices were evaluated: The cumulative number of coughs per cumulative dose of mannitol (CDR), cumulative provocative dose of mannitol to cause at least 5 coughs, and the maximal number of coughs provoked by any single mannitol dose. The test was repeated in 26 subjects after 3-7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDR showed the best repeatability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.829. Gender was the only characteristics that associated with the cough response: The median CDR was 2.53 (interquartile range 0.45-7.01) coughs/100 mg among females and 0.787 (0.0-3.29) coughs/100 mg among males (p = 0.002). The interquartile range upper limits were defined as the cut-off limits for a normal response. The threshold for a statistically significant change in CDR was 6.26 coughs/100 mg. There was a close correlation between simultaneous- and video-assessed CDR (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.985).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females cough more than males in response to mannitol. CDR is the most suitable index to describe the cough responsiveness. The repeatability of the response is good. Video recording of the coughs is not mandatory. The cut-off limits for a normal cough response to mannitol were provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00755-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00755-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:吸入甘露醇会诱发支气管收缩和咳嗽。方法:125 名健康受试者(18-82 岁,52% 为女性,50% 为皮肤点刺试验阳性)接受甘露醇测试。由两名研究人员同时和事后对咳嗽进行录像记录。对三个指数进行了评估:每次甘露醇累积剂量(CDR)的累积咳嗽次数、至少引起 5 次咳嗽的甘露醇累积诱发剂量,以及任何一次甘露醇剂量引起的最大咳嗽次数。26 名受试者在 3-7 天后重复了该测试:结果:CDR的重复性最好,类内相关系数为0.829。性别是唯一与咳嗽反应相关的特征:女性的 CDR 中值为 2.53(四分位数间距为 0.45-7.01)次/100 毫克,男性为 0.787(0.0-3.29)次/100 毫克(P = 0.002)。四分位数区间上限被定义为正常反应的临界值。CDR 有显著统计学变化的临界值为 6.26 次咳嗽/100 毫克。同时评估的 CDR 与视频评估的 CDR 之间存在密切的相关性(类内相关系数为 0.985):结论:女性比男性对甘露醇的反应更强烈。CDR是描述咳嗽反应性的最合适指标。反应的重复性良好。不一定要对咳嗽进行视频记录。提供了咳嗽对甘露醇反应正常的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cough Response to Inhaled Mannitol in Healthy Subjects.

Purpose: Inhaled mannitol induces bronchoconstriction and cough. This study aimed to describe the cough response to mannitol among healthy adult subjects.

Methods: 125 healthy subjects (aged 18-82 years, 52% females, 50% skin prick test positive) underwent a mannitol test. The coughs were recorded both simultaneously and afterwards from video recordings by two researchers. Three indices were evaluated: The cumulative number of coughs per cumulative dose of mannitol (CDR), cumulative provocative dose of mannitol to cause at least 5 coughs, and the maximal number of coughs provoked by any single mannitol dose. The test was repeated in 26 subjects after 3-7 days.

Results: CDR showed the best repeatability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.829. Gender was the only characteristics that associated with the cough response: The median CDR was 2.53 (interquartile range 0.45-7.01) coughs/100 mg among females and 0.787 (0.0-3.29) coughs/100 mg among males (p = 0.002). The interquartile range upper limits were defined as the cut-off limits for a normal response. The threshold for a statistically significant change in CDR was 6.26 coughs/100 mg. There was a close correlation between simultaneous- and video-assessed CDR (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.985).

Conclusion: Females cough more than males in response to mannitol. CDR is the most suitable index to describe the cough responsiveness. The repeatability of the response is good. Video recording of the coughs is not mandatory. The cut-off limits for a normal cough response to mannitol were provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信