Ilkhan Keskin, Osman Samet Günkaya, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Murat Yassa, Niyazi Tuğ
{"title":"评估宫颈扩张术患者痛经的变化:它有用吗?","authors":"Ilkhan Keskin, Osman Samet Günkaya, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Murat Yassa, Niyazi Tuğ","doi":"10.1111/jog.16170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To demonstrate that cervical dilation will relieve symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective cohort study, 30 patients were included in the study group and 30 patients were included in the control group. Age, sex, occupation, education level, duration of dysmenorrhea, and presence of dyspareunia were recorded for all patients. Dilation and hysteroscopy were performed on indicated patients in the study group. In both groups, pain and dysmenorrhea levels were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 2 months postoperatively using the “Visual Analog Score,” “Facial Pain Scale,” “Quality of Life Questionnaire,” and “Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no statistically significant differences in the results of VAS, Facial Pain Scale, Quality of Life Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale before the procedure between the two groups (MWU(Z) = −0.354, <i>p</i>: 0.753), (MWU(Z) = −1.680, <i>p</i>: 0.093), (MWU(Z) = −0.787, <i>p</i>: 0.431), (MWU(Z) = −1.557, <i>p</i>: 0.119, respectively). Although there were no statistically significant differences in the control group survey scores in the second survey, the scores in all surveys in the study group were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study shows that the complaints of the patients decrease in the short and medium term after cervical dilatation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of dysmenorrhea changes in patients undergoing cervical dilatation: Does it work?\",\"authors\":\"Ilkhan Keskin, Osman Samet Günkaya, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Murat Yassa, Niyazi Tuğ\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To demonstrate that cervical dilation will relieve symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this retrospective cohort study, 30 patients were included in the study group and 30 patients were included in the control group. Age, sex, occupation, education level, duration of dysmenorrhea, and presence of dyspareunia were recorded for all patients. Dilation and hysteroscopy were performed on indicated patients in the study group. In both groups, pain and dysmenorrhea levels were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 2 months postoperatively using the “Visual Analog Score,” “Facial Pain Scale,” “Quality of Life Questionnaire,” and “Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale.”</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were no statistically significant differences in the results of VAS, Facial Pain Scale, Quality of Life Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale before the procedure between the two groups (MWU(Z) = −0.354, <i>p</i>: 0.753), (MWU(Z) = −1.680, <i>p</i>: 0.093), (MWU(Z) = −0.787, <i>p</i>: 0.431), (MWU(Z) = −1.557, <i>p</i>: 0.119, respectively). Although there were no statistically significant differences in the control group survey scores in the second survey, the scores in all surveys in the study group were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study shows that the complaints of the patients decrease in the short and medium term after cervical dilatation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16170\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of dysmenorrhea changes in patients undergoing cervical dilatation: Does it work?
Objective
To demonstrate that cervical dilation will relieve symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, 30 patients were included in the study group and 30 patients were included in the control group. Age, sex, occupation, education level, duration of dysmenorrhea, and presence of dyspareunia were recorded for all patients. Dilation and hysteroscopy were performed on indicated patients in the study group. In both groups, pain and dysmenorrhea levels were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 2 months postoperatively using the “Visual Analog Score,” “Facial Pain Scale,” “Quality of Life Questionnaire,” and “Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale.”
Results
There were no statistically significant differences in the results of VAS, Facial Pain Scale, Quality of Life Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status Scale before the procedure between the two groups (MWU(Z) = −0.354, p: 0.753), (MWU(Z) = −1.680, p: 0.093), (MWU(Z) = −0.787, p: 0.431), (MWU(Z) = −1.557, p: 0.119, respectively). Although there were no statistically significant differences in the control group survey scores in the second survey, the scores in all surveys in the study group were statistically significant (p < .05).
Conclusion
This study shows that the complaints of the patients decrease in the short and medium term after cervical dilatation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.