来自孟加拉国本地分离株的传染性支气管炎病毒候选灭活疫苗的免疫原性和保护效力。

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research Pub Date : 2024-09-29 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5455/javar.2024.k809
Mst Kohinoor Parvin, Md Enamul Haque, Mohammad Aynul Haque, Md Mostofa Kamal, Mohammad Sadekuzzaman, Sajedul Hayat, Md Tanvir Rahman, Mahbubul Pratik Siddique, Sham Soun Nahar, A K M Khasruzzaman, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, Md Alimul Islam
{"title":"来自孟加拉国本地分离株的传染性支气管炎病毒候选灭活疫苗的免疫原性和保护效力。","authors":"Mst Kohinoor Parvin, Md Enamul Haque, Mohammad Aynul Haque, Md Mostofa Kamal, Mohammad Sadekuzzaman, Sajedul Hayat, Md Tanvir Rahman, Mahbubul Pratik Siddique, Sham Soun Nahar, A K M Khasruzzaman, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, Md Alimul Islam","doi":"10.5455/javar.2024.k809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Infectious bronchitis (IB), a highly infectious acute viral disease, is a major burden to the chicken industry worldwide. The research aimed to develop an inactivated IB vaccine using local isolates and assess its immunogenicity compared to other commercial live IB vaccines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An inactivated vaccine using a candidate IB virus (PP067159.1: Alim_IB_1001) of the QX genotype was developed according to WOAH guidelines. Chickens were vaccinated with three doses (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ml) at 7 days old, with a booster at 37 days old via subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) routes. Blood samples were collected on days 7, 37, and 67 to measure immune response by indirect ELISA. On day 67, chickens were challenged with a virulent IBV strain to assess vaccine protection. The experimental IB vaccine's immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and antibody duration were compared to a live IB vaccine (Live CEVAC<sup>®</sup> IBird) using three vaccination schedules: killed-followed-killed, live-followed-killed, and live-followed-live.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chickens vaccinated with SC with 1.0 ml showed higher antibody titers compared to other SC and IM routes of vaccination. SC vaccination with 0.5 and 1 ml provided the highest protection (93%). The killed-followed-killed vaccination method produced a more consistent and protective level of antibody titers in chickens compared to the other vaccination schedules. The experimental inactivated IB vaccine led to a higher survival rate (93%) compared to live-followed-killed (87%) and live-followed-live (73%), with statistical significance (<i>p < 0.01</i>). All three chicken groups maintained protective antibody titers (>396) at 307 days, but titers declined faster in the live-followed-live and live-followed-killed groups compared to the killed-followed-killed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that the experimental inactivated IB vaccination can protect commercial-layer chickens from natural IB outbreaks of the QX genotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an inactivated infectious bronchitis virus vaccine candidate from a local isolate of Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Mst Kohinoor Parvin, Md Enamul Haque, Mohammad Aynul Haque, Md Mostofa Kamal, Mohammad Sadekuzzaman, Sajedul Hayat, Md Tanvir Rahman, Mahbubul Pratik Siddique, Sham Soun Nahar, A K M Khasruzzaman, Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain, Md Alimul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/javar.2024.k809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Infectious bronchitis (IB), a highly infectious acute viral disease, is a major burden to the chicken industry worldwide. The research aimed to develop an inactivated IB vaccine using local isolates and assess its immunogenicity compared to other commercial live IB vaccines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An inactivated vaccine using a candidate IB virus (PP067159.1: Alim_IB_1001) of the QX genotype was developed according to WOAH guidelines. Chickens were vaccinated with three doses (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ml) at 7 days old, with a booster at 37 days old via subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) routes. Blood samples were collected on days 7, 37, and 67 to measure immune response by indirect ELISA. On day 67, chickens were challenged with a virulent IBV strain to assess vaccine protection. The experimental IB vaccine's immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and antibody duration were compared to a live IB vaccine (Live CEVAC<sup>®</sup> IBird) using three vaccination schedules: killed-followed-killed, live-followed-killed, and live-followed-live.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chickens vaccinated with SC with 1.0 ml showed higher antibody titers compared to other SC and IM routes of vaccination. SC vaccination with 0.5 and 1 ml provided the highest protection (93%). The killed-followed-killed vaccination method produced a more consistent and protective level of antibody titers in chickens compared to the other vaccination schedules. The experimental inactivated IB vaccine led to a higher survival rate (93%) compared to live-followed-killed (87%) and live-followed-live (73%), with statistical significance (<i>p < 0.01</i>). All three chicken groups maintained protective antibody titers (>396) at 307 days, but titers declined faster in the live-followed-live and live-followed-killed groups compared to the killed-followed-killed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that the experimental inactivated IB vaccination can protect commercial-layer chickens from natural IB outbreaks of the QX genotype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"592-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:传染性支气管炎(IB)是一种传染性极强的急性病毒性疾病,是全球养鸡业的主要负担。该研究旨在利用本地分离株开发 IB 灭活疫苗,并评估其与其他商用 IB 活疫苗相比的免疫原性:根据 WOAH 指南,使用 QX 基因型候选 IB 病毒(PP067159.1: Alim_IB_1001)开发了灭活疫苗。雏鸡 7 日龄时接种三剂疫苗(0.25、0.5 和 1.0 毫升),37 日龄时通过皮下 (SC) 和肌肉注射 (IM) 途径加强免疫。第 7 天、第 37 天和第 67 天采集血液样本,通过间接 ELISA 法测量免疫反应。第 67 天,用毒力强的 IBV 株对鸡进行挑战,以评估疫苗的保护作用。实验性 IB 疫苗的免疫原性、保护效力和抗体持续时间与 IB 活疫苗(CEVAC® IBird 活疫苗)进行了比较,采用了三种接种方案:杀后随即杀死、杀后随即杀死和杀后随即杀死:结果:用 1.0 毫升疫苗进行 SC 疫苗接种的鸡的抗体滴度高于其他 SC 和 IM 疫苗接种途径。用 0.5 毫升和 1 毫升进行 SC 疫苗接种可提供最高的保护率(93%)。与其他接种方法相比,杀后接种法产生的抗体滴度更稳定,保护水平更高。试验性 IB 灭活疫苗的存活率(93%)高于杀后活疫苗(87%)和活后活疫苗(73%),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。所有三组鸡在307天时都保持了保护性抗体滴度(>396),但与杀死-跟随-活体组相比,活体-跟随-活体组和杀死-跟随-活体组的滴度下降更快:研究发现,试验性 IB 灭活疫苗接种可保护商品层鸡免受 QX 基因型 IB 自然疫情的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an inactivated infectious bronchitis virus vaccine candidate from a local isolate of Bangladesh.

Objective: Infectious bronchitis (IB), a highly infectious acute viral disease, is a major burden to the chicken industry worldwide. The research aimed to develop an inactivated IB vaccine using local isolates and assess its immunogenicity compared to other commercial live IB vaccines.

Materials and methods: An inactivated vaccine using a candidate IB virus (PP067159.1: Alim_IB_1001) of the QX genotype was developed according to WOAH guidelines. Chickens were vaccinated with three doses (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ml) at 7 days old, with a booster at 37 days old via subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) routes. Blood samples were collected on days 7, 37, and 67 to measure immune response by indirect ELISA. On day 67, chickens were challenged with a virulent IBV strain to assess vaccine protection. The experimental IB vaccine's immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and antibody duration were compared to a live IB vaccine (Live CEVAC® IBird) using three vaccination schedules: killed-followed-killed, live-followed-killed, and live-followed-live.

Results: Chickens vaccinated with SC with 1.0 ml showed higher antibody titers compared to other SC and IM routes of vaccination. SC vaccination with 0.5 and 1 ml provided the highest protection (93%). The killed-followed-killed vaccination method produced a more consistent and protective level of antibody titers in chickens compared to the other vaccination schedules. The experimental inactivated IB vaccine led to a higher survival rate (93%) compared to live-followed-killed (87%) and live-followed-live (73%), with statistical significance (p < 0.01). All three chicken groups maintained protective antibody titers (>396) at 307 days, but titers declined faster in the live-followed-live and live-followed-killed groups compared to the killed-followed-killed group.

Conclusion: The study found that the experimental inactivated IB vaccination can protect commercial-layer chickens from natural IB outbreaks of the QX genotype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research (JAVAR) - is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, quarterly, highly-indexed scientific journal publishing original research findings and reviews on all aspects of veterinary and animal sciences. Basic and applied researches on- - Anatomy & histology - Animal health economics - Animal nutrition - Animal reproduction - Animal science - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - Biochemistry - Biotechnology - Dairy science - Epidemiology - Food hygiene and technology - Genetics and breeding - Immunology - Microbiology - Parasitology - Pathology - Pharmacology & toxicology - Physiology - Poultry science - Preventive veterinary medicine - Public health - Surgery & obstetrics - Veterinary extension studies - Wildlife & aquatic medicine - Zoo animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信