"专科医院样本中通过 24 小时动态血压测量诊断出的被掩盖的高血压临床预测模型"。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
J Minetto, W Espeche, C E Leiva Sisnieguez, G Cerri, J I Perez Duhalde, D Olano, M R Salazar
{"title":"\"专科医院样本中通过 24 小时动态血压测量诊断出的被掩盖的高血压临床预测模型\"。","authors":"J Minetto, W Espeche, C E Leiva Sisnieguez, G Cerri, J I Perez Duhalde, D Olano, M R Salazar","doi":"10.1038/s41371-024-00980-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conventional assessment of the relationship between arterial hypertension (AH) and cardiovascular damage has predominantly relied on office measurements. However, the diagnostic significance of ambulatory and home measurements has gained prominence, particularly in identifying distinct AH phenotypes like masked hypertension (MH), characterized by normal office values but elevated readings outside the clinical setting, carrying comparable risks to sustained AH. Current guidelines advocate for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in individuals with office values exceeding 130/85 mmHg. This study aims to develop a clinical prediction model to identify masked hypertension in individuals with normal office blood pressure and to create a clinical score.A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary level hospital, including patients aged 18-85 years with average office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg who underwent a valid ABPM on the same day. Pregnant and postpartum women were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model with calibration, discrimination, and stability parameters was applied to predict masked hypertension. 506 individuals with valid ABPM were analysed. The prevalence of masked hypertension was 30.8%. The selected variables were: diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, waist diameter and sex. The model calibrated adequately (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.35), with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.77). Significant differences existed between the traditional and the new models (p < 0.001). A user-friendly clinical model was developed, with a clinical score achieving 90% specificity using an estimated probability of 0.4 with a 10-point score.A novel model, performed with easily collectable clinical variables, showed robust calibration, stability, and discrimination. It outperforms sole reliance on office blood pressure, exhibiting high specificity (~90%) for masked hypertension detection. Its internal validity suggests a potential for enhanced masked hypertension identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Clinical prediction model for masked hypertension diagnosed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements in a sample from specialized hospital.\\\"\",\"authors\":\"J Minetto, W Espeche, C E Leiva Sisnieguez, G Cerri, J I Perez Duhalde, D Olano, M R Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-024-00980-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The conventional assessment of the relationship between arterial hypertension (AH) and cardiovascular damage has predominantly relied on office measurements. However, the diagnostic significance of ambulatory and home measurements has gained prominence, particularly in identifying distinct AH phenotypes like masked hypertension (MH), characterized by normal office values but elevated readings outside the clinical setting, carrying comparable risks to sustained AH. Current guidelines advocate for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in individuals with office values exceeding 130/85 mmHg. This study aims to develop a clinical prediction model to identify masked hypertension in individuals with normal office blood pressure and to create a clinical score.A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary level hospital, including patients aged 18-85 years with average office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg who underwent a valid ABPM on the same day. Pregnant and postpartum women were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model with calibration, discrimination, and stability parameters was applied to predict masked hypertension. 506 individuals with valid ABPM were analysed. The prevalence of masked hypertension was 30.8%. The selected variables were: diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, waist diameter and sex. The model calibrated adequately (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.35), with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.77). Significant differences existed between the traditional and the new models (p < 0.001). A user-friendly clinical model was developed, with a clinical score achieving 90% specificity using an estimated probability of 0.4 with a 10-point score.A novel model, performed with easily collectable clinical variables, showed robust calibration, stability, and discrimination. It outperforms sole reliance on office blood pressure, exhibiting high specificity (~90%) for masked hypertension detection. Its internal validity suggests a potential for enhanced masked hypertension identification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-024-00980-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-024-00980-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动脉高血压(AH)与心血管损害之间关系的传统评估主要依赖于诊室测量。然而,非卧床和居家测量的诊断意义日益突出,尤其是在识别不同的高血压表型方面,如掩蔽性高血压(MH),其特点是诊室血压值正常,但在临床环境外读数升高,与持续性高血压的风险相当。目前的指南提倡对诊室血压值超过 130/85 mmHg 的患者进行非卧床血压监测 (ABPM)。本研究旨在开发一个临床预测模型,以识别诊室血压正常者中的被掩盖高血压,并创建一个临床评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Clinical prediction model for masked hypertension diagnosed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements in a sample from specialized hospital."

The conventional assessment of the relationship between arterial hypertension (AH) and cardiovascular damage has predominantly relied on office measurements. However, the diagnostic significance of ambulatory and home measurements has gained prominence, particularly in identifying distinct AH phenotypes like masked hypertension (MH), characterized by normal office values but elevated readings outside the clinical setting, carrying comparable risks to sustained AH. Current guidelines advocate for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in individuals with office values exceeding 130/85 mmHg. This study aims to develop a clinical prediction model to identify masked hypertension in individuals with normal office blood pressure and to create a clinical score.A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary level hospital, including patients aged 18-85 years with average office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg who underwent a valid ABPM on the same day. Pregnant and postpartum women were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model with calibration, discrimination, and stability parameters was applied to predict masked hypertension. 506 individuals with valid ABPM were analysed. The prevalence of masked hypertension was 30.8%. The selected variables were: diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, waist diameter and sex. The model calibrated adequately (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.35), with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.77). Significant differences existed between the traditional and the new models (p < 0.001). A user-friendly clinical model was developed, with a clinical score achieving 90% specificity using an estimated probability of 0.4 with a 10-point score.A novel model, performed with easily collectable clinical variables, showed robust calibration, stability, and discrimination. It outperforms sole reliance on office blood pressure, exhibiting high specificity (~90%) for masked hypertension detection. Its internal validity suggests a potential for enhanced masked hypertension identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Hypertension
Journal of Human Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension. The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信