采用高眼压和低眼压设置的超声乳化手机的效率。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall
{"title":"采用高眼压和低眼压设置的超声乳化手机的效率。","authors":"Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of phacoemulsification handpieces with high and low intraocular pressure settings.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较 Active Sentry 手机在低眼压(20 mmHg)和 Ozil 手机在高眼压(50 mmHg)时的效率:私人诊所(美国俄勒冈州梅德福):设计:单点、前瞻性、双臂、随机、对侧眼研究:第一只接受手术的眼睛被随机分配到使用20 mmHg的Active Sentry手机(Active Sentry组)或50 mmHg的Ozil手机(Ozil组)进行超声乳化。第二只接受手术的眼睛被分配到另一组。结果测量包括phaco时间、总吸入时间、phaco过程中的吸入时间、液体使用量、累积耗散能量、总扭转时间、总纵向时间和中心角膜厚度:共有 36 名受试者(72 只眼)完成了研究。Active Sentry 组的平均吸液总时间为 90.1 ± 16.4 秒,Ozil 组为 85.1 ± 17.0 秒(P > 0.05)。主动哨兵组和 Ozil 组在 phaco 期间的平均吸液时间分别为 40.9 ± 8.5 秒和 40.4 ± 8.8 秒(P > 0.05)。主动哨兵组和 Ozil 组在 phaco 期间的平均总吸液时间分别为 29.5 ± 7.3 秒和 31.0 ± 7.4 秒(P > 0.05)。主动哨兵组的平均液体总量为 32.8 ± 4.6 毫升,厄齐尔组为 33.8 ± 6.0 毫升(P > 0.05):本研究结果表明,Active Sentry 手机在低眼压设置下的效率与 Ozil 手机在高眼压设置下的效率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of phacoemulsification handpieces with high and low intraocular pressure settings.

Purpose: To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).

Setting: Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).

Design: Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.

Methods: The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.

Results: A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信