南非膳食多酚数据质量评估工具的开发、验证和应用。

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heliyon Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40231
Malory R Jumat, Kwaku G Duodu, Averalda E van Graan
{"title":"南非膳食多酚数据质量评估工具的开发、验证和应用。","authors":"Malory R Jumat, Kwaku G Duodu, Averalda E van Graan","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a wealth of South African scientific literature studying and reporting on dietary polyphenols in research articles and academic literature. The evaluation of data quality is critical to ensure polyphenol data compiled from various scientific journals and academic texts are acceptable in terms of compilation standards. This study aimed to develop, validate, and apply a country specific South African dietary polyphenol data quality assessment tool (SADPDQAT). The evaluation tool considered nine evaluation categories with a maximum score of 5. For each literature source assessed, a quality score and confidence code was assigned. Validation analysis revealed generally consistent results between raters with an average percentage agreement of 65 %, no scores falling outside of Bland-Altman limits of agreement and a moderate internal consistency α = 0.533 which was improved to 0.616. Applying the tool to 383 scientific studies showed that most literature obtained a quality score between 70 and 79 % resulting in a confidence code of \"B\" (n = 166, 43 %) and a score between 60 and 69 % resulting in a confidence code of \"C\" (n = 125, 33 %). The SADPDQAT can be used to evaluate a variety of dietary polyphenol containing literature and aids in setting priorities for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"10 22","pages":"e40231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, validation, and application of a South African Dietary Polyphenol Data Quality Assessment Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Malory R Jumat, Kwaku G Duodu, Averalda E van Graan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a wealth of South African scientific literature studying and reporting on dietary polyphenols in research articles and academic literature. The evaluation of data quality is critical to ensure polyphenol data compiled from various scientific journals and academic texts are acceptable in terms of compilation standards. This study aimed to develop, validate, and apply a country specific South African dietary polyphenol data quality assessment tool (SADPDQAT). The evaluation tool considered nine evaluation categories with a maximum score of 5. For each literature source assessed, a quality score and confidence code was assigned. Validation analysis revealed generally consistent results between raters with an average percentage agreement of 65 %, no scores falling outside of Bland-Altman limits of agreement and a moderate internal consistency α = 0.533 which was improved to 0.616. Applying the tool to 383 scientific studies showed that most literature obtained a quality score between 70 and 79 % resulting in a confidence code of \\\"B\\\" (n = 166, 43 %) and a score between 60 and 69 % resulting in a confidence code of \\\"C\\\" (n = 125, 33 %). The SADPDQAT can be used to evaluate a variety of dietary polyphenol containing literature and aids in setting priorities for further research in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heliyon\",\"volume\":\"10 22\",\"pages\":\"e40231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heliyon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南非有大量的科学文献在研究文章和学术文献中研究和报告膳食多酚。数据质量评估对于确保从各种科学期刊和学术文献中汇编的多酚数据符合汇编标准至关重要。本研究旨在开发、验证和应用针对特定国家的南非膳食多酚数据质量评估工具(SADPDQAT)。评估工具考虑了九个评估类别,最高分为 5 分。对评估的每个文献来源都分配了质量分数和置信度代码。验证分析表明,评分者之间的评分结果基本一致,平均一致率为 65%,没有评分超出布兰-阿尔特曼(Bland-Altman)的一致限度,内部一致性 α = 0.533,已提高到 0.616。将该工具应用于 383 项科学研究表明,大多数文献的质量得分介于 70% 和 79% 之间,可信度代码为 "B"(n = 166,43%),得分介于 60% 和 69% 之间,可信度代码为 "C"(n = 125,33%)。SADPDQAT 可用于评估各种含有多酚的膳食文献,并有助于确定该领域进一步研究的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development, validation, and application of a South African Dietary Polyphenol Data Quality Assessment Tool.

There is a wealth of South African scientific literature studying and reporting on dietary polyphenols in research articles and academic literature. The evaluation of data quality is critical to ensure polyphenol data compiled from various scientific journals and academic texts are acceptable in terms of compilation standards. This study aimed to develop, validate, and apply a country specific South African dietary polyphenol data quality assessment tool (SADPDQAT). The evaluation tool considered nine evaluation categories with a maximum score of 5. For each literature source assessed, a quality score and confidence code was assigned. Validation analysis revealed generally consistent results between raters with an average percentage agreement of 65 %, no scores falling outside of Bland-Altman limits of agreement and a moderate internal consistency α = 0.533 which was improved to 0.616. Applying the tool to 383 scientific studies showed that most literature obtained a quality score between 70 and 79 % resulting in a confidence code of "B" (n = 166, 43 %) and a score between 60 and 69 % resulting in a confidence code of "C" (n = 125, 33 %). The SADPDQAT can be used to evaluate a variety of dietary polyphenol containing literature and aids in setting priorities for further research in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信