英格兰主动脉瓣狭窄的手术和经导管主动脉瓣介入治疗:20 年来治疗趋势和结果的社会人口变化。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324918
Anvesha Singh, Fionna Chalmers, Saadia Aslam, Thomas Bolton, Anna Stevenson, Iain Squire, Kamlesh Khunti, Gerry P McCann, Claire Lawson
{"title":"英格兰主动脉瓣狭窄的手术和经导管主动脉瓣介入治疗:20 年来治疗趋势和结果的社会人口变化。","authors":"Anvesha Singh, Fionna Chalmers, Saadia Aslam, Thomas Bolton, Anna Stevenson, Iain Squire, Kamlesh Khunti, Gerry P McCann, Claire Lawson","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health inequalities in cardiovascular care have been identified in the UK. The sociodemographic characteristics of patients undergoing intervention for aortic stenosis (AS) in England, and the impact of COVID-19, is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National linked data sets identified all surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for AS, and post-intervention cardiovascular mortality, between 2000 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 179 645 procedures, there were 139 990 SAVR (mean age 71±10.8 years, 64% male, 96.0% white) and 39 655 TAVI (mean age 81±7.7 years, 57% male, 95.7% white). Rates of SAVR declined during COVID-19 for all groups, but TAVI rates increased steadily. Women were older; ethnic minority groups and those from most deprived areas were younger, with greater comorbidities. Women and more deprived groups had lower rates of SAVR (age-standardised rates per 100 000 in 2020-2023: 17.07 <i>vs</i> 6.65 for men <i>vs</i> women; 9.82 <i>vs</i> 10.10 for Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)-1 <i>vs</i> IMD-5) and TAVI (20.20 <i>vs</i> 9.79 for men <i>vs</i> women; 9.55 <i>vs</i> 13.36 for IMD-1 <i>vs</i> IMD-5). These discrepancies widened over time. Ethnic differences were observed for SAVR, with the lowest rates in black patients. Cardiovascular mortality post-intervention was lower in female patients and with decreasing deprivation, with no ethnicity-based differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are differences in intervention rates for AS in England, with lower rates in female patients and to a lesser extent, those from the most deprived areas and ethnic minority groups. These variations have widened over time. Post-intervention cardiovascular mortality is lower in women and with decreasing deprivation. Public health measures and research are needed to identify the true prevalence of AS in different populations, and the reasons for potential inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve interventions for aortic stenosis in England: sociodemographic variations in treatment trends and outcome over 20 years.\",\"authors\":\"Anvesha Singh, Fionna Chalmers, Saadia Aslam, Thomas Bolton, Anna Stevenson, Iain Squire, Kamlesh Khunti, Gerry P McCann, Claire Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health inequalities in cardiovascular care have been identified in the UK. The sociodemographic characteristics of patients undergoing intervention for aortic stenosis (AS) in England, and the impact of COVID-19, is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National linked data sets identified all surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for AS, and post-intervention cardiovascular mortality, between 2000 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 179 645 procedures, there were 139 990 SAVR (mean age 71±10.8 years, 64% male, 96.0% white) and 39 655 TAVI (mean age 81±7.7 years, 57% male, 95.7% white). Rates of SAVR declined during COVID-19 for all groups, but TAVI rates increased steadily. Women were older; ethnic minority groups and those from most deprived areas were younger, with greater comorbidities. Women and more deprived groups had lower rates of SAVR (age-standardised rates per 100 000 in 2020-2023: 17.07 <i>vs</i> 6.65 for men <i>vs</i> women; 9.82 <i>vs</i> 10.10 for Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)-1 <i>vs</i> IMD-5) and TAVI (20.20 <i>vs</i> 9.79 for men <i>vs</i> women; 9.55 <i>vs</i> 13.36 for IMD-1 <i>vs</i> IMD-5). These discrepancies widened over time. Ethnic differences were observed for SAVR, with the lowest rates in black patients. Cardiovascular mortality post-intervention was lower in female patients and with decreasing deprivation, with no ethnicity-based differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are differences in intervention rates for AS in England, with lower rates in female patients and to a lesser extent, those from the most deprived areas and ethnic minority groups. These variations have widened over time. Post-intervention cardiovascular mortality is lower in women and with decreasing deprivation. Public health measures and research are needed to identify the true prevalence of AS in different populations, and the reasons for potential inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"278-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324918\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国已发现心血管治疗中存在健康不平等现象。英国接受主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)介入治疗的患者的社会人口特征以及 COVID-19 的影响尚不清楚:国家链接数据集确定了2000年至2023年间所有主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)以及介入后心血管死亡率:在179 645例手术中,SAVR为139 990例(平均年龄71±10.8岁,64%为男性,96.0%为白人),TAVI为39 655例(平均年龄81±7.7岁,57%为男性,95.7%为白人)。在 COVID-19 期间,所有组别的 SAVR 率均有所下降,但 TAVI 率稳步上升。女性年龄较大;少数民族群体和来自最贫困地区的人群年龄较小,合并症较多。女性和更贫困群体的 SAVR(2020-2023 年每 100 000 人中年龄标准化比率:男性 17.07 vs 女性 6.65;多重贫困指数(IMD)-1 vs IMD-5:9.82 vs 10.10)和 TAVI(男性 20.20 vs 女性 9.79;IMD-1 vs IMD-5:9.55 vs 13.36)比率较低。这些差异随着时间的推移而扩大。SAVR观察到了种族差异,黑人患者的比例最低。女性患者干预后的心血管死亡率较低,且随着贫困程度的降低而降低,但没有种族差异:结论:在英格兰,强直性脊柱炎的干预率存在差异,女性患者的干预率较低,来自最贫困地区和少数民族群体的干预率也较低。随着时间的推移,这些差异有所扩大。女性患者干预后的心血管死亡率较低,而且随着贫困程度的降低而降低。需要采取公共卫生措施并开展研究,以确定强直性脊柱炎在不同人群中的真实发病率以及潜在不平等的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve interventions for aortic stenosis in England: sociodemographic variations in treatment trends and outcome over 20 years.

Background: Health inequalities in cardiovascular care have been identified in the UK. The sociodemographic characteristics of patients undergoing intervention for aortic stenosis (AS) in England, and the impact of COVID-19, is unknown.

Methods: National linked data sets identified all surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for AS, and post-intervention cardiovascular mortality, between 2000 and 2023.

Results: Of 179 645 procedures, there were 139 990 SAVR (mean age 71±10.8 years, 64% male, 96.0% white) and 39 655 TAVI (mean age 81±7.7 years, 57% male, 95.7% white). Rates of SAVR declined during COVID-19 for all groups, but TAVI rates increased steadily. Women were older; ethnic minority groups and those from most deprived areas were younger, with greater comorbidities. Women and more deprived groups had lower rates of SAVR (age-standardised rates per 100 000 in 2020-2023: 17.07 vs 6.65 for men vs women; 9.82 vs 10.10 for Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)-1 vs IMD-5) and TAVI (20.20 vs 9.79 for men vs women; 9.55 vs 13.36 for IMD-1 vs IMD-5). These discrepancies widened over time. Ethnic differences were observed for SAVR, with the lowest rates in black patients. Cardiovascular mortality post-intervention was lower in female patients and with decreasing deprivation, with no ethnicity-based differences.

Conclusions: There are differences in intervention rates for AS in England, with lower rates in female patients and to a lesser extent, those from the most deprived areas and ethnic minority groups. These variations have widened over time. Post-intervention cardiovascular mortality is lower in women and with decreasing deprivation. Public health measures and research are needed to identify the true prevalence of AS in different populations, and the reasons for potential inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信