Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Tyll Jandewerth, Petra Davidova, Eva Hemkeppler, Christoph Lwowski, Myriam Böhm, Thomas Kohnen
{"title":"LASIK-Xtra 与传统 Femto-LASIK 相比对高度近视眼角膜生物力学的影响。","authors":"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Tyll Jandewerth, Petra Davidova, Eva Hemkeppler, Christoph Lwowski, Myriam Böhm, Thomas Kohnen","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) compared with conventional FS-LASIK (convLASIK) in highly myopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized fellow eye-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received treatment with LASIK Xtra (30mW/cm 2 , 90 seconds with continuous UV-A) in 1 eye and convLASIK in the other eye were enrolled. Both eyes were subjected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to a Corvis ST examination. The stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex, and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 38 high myopic eyes (-7.34 ± 1.02 diopters) of 19 patients. The results of the corneal biomechanical measurement showed a significant reduction in overall corneal stiffness with a significant decrease in postoperative SP-A1 and increase in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( P < .001). In a direct comparison, there was no evidence of an increase in corneal stiffness in the LASIK Xtra group compared with the convLASIK group 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the 4 biomechanical parameters ( P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corneal biomechanical response to convLASIK and LASIK Xtra did not vary significantly. With a similar corneal thickness loss, there was no significant difference in the 4 biomechanical metrics between the convLASIK and LASIK Xtra groups. Thus, LASIK Xtra appeared not to have a protective corneal stiffening effect compared with convLASIK 12 months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"106-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical corneal effects of LASIK Xtra compared with conventional FS-LASIK in high myopic eyes.\",\"authors\":\"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Tyll Jandewerth, Petra Davidova, Eva Hemkeppler, Christoph Lwowski, Myriam Böhm, Thomas Kohnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) compared with conventional FS-LASIK (convLASIK) in highly myopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized fellow eye-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received treatment with LASIK Xtra (30mW/cm 2 , 90 seconds with continuous UV-A) in 1 eye and convLASIK in the other eye were enrolled. Both eyes were subjected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to a Corvis ST examination. The stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex, and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 38 high myopic eyes (-7.34 ± 1.02 diopters) of 19 patients. The results of the corneal biomechanical measurement showed a significant reduction in overall corneal stiffness with a significant decrease in postoperative SP-A1 and increase in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( P < .001). In a direct comparison, there was no evidence of an increase in corneal stiffness in the LASIK Xtra group compared with the convLASIK group 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the 4 biomechanical parameters ( P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corneal biomechanical response to convLASIK and LASIK Xtra did not vary significantly. With a similar corneal thickness loss, there was no significant difference in the 4 biomechanical metrics between the convLASIK and LASIK Xtra groups. Thus, LASIK Xtra appeared not to have a protective corneal stiffening effect compared with convLASIK 12 months postoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"106-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical corneal effects of LASIK Xtra compared with conventional FS-LASIK in high myopic eyes.
Purpose: To investigate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) compared with conventional FS-LASIK (convLASIK) in highly myopic eyes.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Methods: Patients who received treatment with LASIK Xtra (30mW/cm 2 , 90 seconds with continuous UV-A) in 1 eye and convLASIK in the other eye were enrolled. Both eyes were subjected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to a Corvis ST examination. The stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex, and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm) were evaluated.
Results: The study included 38 high myopic eyes (-7.34 ± 1.02 diopters) of 19 patients. The results of the corneal biomechanical measurement showed a significant reduction in overall corneal stiffness with a significant decrease in postoperative SP-A1 and increase in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( P < .001). In a direct comparison, there was no evidence of an increase in corneal stiffness in the LASIK Xtra group compared with the convLASIK group 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the 4 biomechanical parameters ( P > .05).
Conclusions: The corneal biomechanical response to convLASIK and LASIK Xtra did not vary significantly. With a similar corneal thickness loss, there was no significant difference in the 4 biomechanical metrics between the convLASIK and LASIK Xtra groups. Thus, LASIK Xtra appeared not to have a protective corneal stiffening effect compared with convLASIK 12 months postoperatively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.