在内窥镜下使用虚拟尺测量食管静脉曲张直径与门静脉压力梯度之间的相关性。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1443581
Yudi Mao, Zhongliang Fang, Yingying He, Jing Jin, Xiping Ding, Derun Kong
{"title":"在内窥镜下使用虚拟尺测量食管静脉曲张直径与门静脉压力梯度之间的相关性。","authors":"Yudi Mao, Zhongliang Fang, Yingying He, Jing Jin, Xiping Ding, Derun Kong","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1443581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal variceal diameter (EVD) is a crucial factor in determining the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding, which is associated with an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG). However, research into the relationship between EVD and PPG has been limited, primarily because the assessment of EVD depends on visual estimation during endoscopy. Recently, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to accurately detect EVD. In this study, we aim to investigate the correlation between EVD and PPG, with the goal of evaluating EVD as a potential non-invasive indicator of PPG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included both retrospective and prospective data from 128 patients diagnosed with portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices, gathered from two medical institutions. Clinical data including PPG, biochemical markers, and routine blood tests were collected. In the retrospective phase, EVD was evaluated using an AI-based virtual ruler. In the prospective phase, PPG was measured using radiological intervention methods, and EVD was measured during endoscopy with the aid of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A positive correlation between PPG and EVD was identified (<i>r</i> = 0.521, <i>P</i> < 0.001), which was further supported by multivariate linear regression analysis (b = 6.521, t = 6.872, <i>P</i> < 0.001). When patients were stratified into two groups based on PPG levels (27 patients with PPG < 20 mmHg and 101 patients with PPG ≥ 20 mmHg), a significant difference in EVD was observed between the groups (OR = 29.275, 95% CI 5.590-153.304, <i>P</i> < 0.001), with larger EVD in the higher PPG group. These findings suggest that EVD may serve as a predictor of adverse events associated with elevated PPG levels. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that EVD had an accuracy of 0.814 in diagnosing PPG function (standard error 0.048, 95% CI 0.720-0.908; P < 0.001), indicating that PPG levels are likely to exceed 20 mmHg when the variceal diameter is greater than 1.1 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVD demonstrated a positive correlation with PPG and could potentially be used as a predictive marker for assessing PPG levels. These findings provide novel insights for the non-invasive evaluation of PPG in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1443581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the diameter of esophageal varices measured using a virtual ruler under endoscopy and portal pressure gradient.\",\"authors\":\"Yudi Mao, Zhongliang Fang, Yingying He, Jing Jin, Xiping Ding, Derun Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1443581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal variceal diameter (EVD) is a crucial factor in determining the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding, which is associated with an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG). However, research into the relationship between EVD and PPG has been limited, primarily because the assessment of EVD depends on visual estimation during endoscopy. Recently, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to accurately detect EVD. In this study, we aim to investigate the correlation between EVD and PPG, with the goal of evaluating EVD as a potential non-invasive indicator of PPG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included both retrospective and prospective data from 128 patients diagnosed with portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices, gathered from two medical institutions. Clinical data including PPG, biochemical markers, and routine blood tests were collected. In the retrospective phase, EVD was evaluated using an AI-based virtual ruler. In the prospective phase, PPG was measured using radiological intervention methods, and EVD was measured during endoscopy with the aid of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A positive correlation between PPG and EVD was identified (<i>r</i> = 0.521, <i>P</i> < 0.001), which was further supported by multivariate linear regression analysis (b = 6.521, t = 6.872, <i>P</i> < 0.001). When patients were stratified into two groups based on PPG levels (27 patients with PPG < 20 mmHg and 101 patients with PPG ≥ 20 mmHg), a significant difference in EVD was observed between the groups (OR = 29.275, 95% CI 5.590-153.304, <i>P</i> < 0.001), with larger EVD in the higher PPG group. These findings suggest that EVD may serve as a predictor of adverse events associated with elevated PPG levels. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that EVD had an accuracy of 0.814 in diagnosing PPG function (standard error 0.048, 95% CI 0.720-0.908; P < 0.001), indicating that PPG levels are likely to exceed 20 mmHg when the variceal diameter is greater than 1.1 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVD demonstrated a positive correlation with PPG and could potentially be used as a predictive marker for assessing PPG levels. These findings provide novel insights for the non-invasive evaluation of PPG in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1443581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1443581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1443581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管静脉曲张直径(EVD)是决定食管静脉曲张出血风险的关键因素,而食管静脉曲张出血与门静脉压力梯度(PPG)增加有关。然而,对 EVD 和 PPG 之间关系的研究一直很有限,主要是因为 EVD 的评估依赖于内镜检查时的目测。最近,我们开发了一种基于人工智能(AI)的方法来准确检测 EVD。在本研究中,我们旨在研究 EVD 与 PPG 之间的相关性,目的是将 EVD 评估为 PPG 的潜在无创指标:本研究包括来自两家医疗机构的 128 名被诊断为门脉高压症和胃食管静脉曲张患者的回顾性和前瞻性数据。研究收集了包括 PPG、生化指标和血常规检查在内的临床数据。在回顾阶段,使用基于人工智能的虚拟标尺对 EVD 进行评估。在前瞻性阶段,使用放射介入方法测量 PPG,并在内窥镜检查期间借助人工智能测量 EVD:结果:PPG 和 EVD 之间呈正相关(r = 0.521,P < 0.001),多变量线性回归分析进一步证实了这一点(b = 6.521,t = 6.872,P < 0.001)。根据 PPG 水平将患者分为两组(PPG < 20 mmHg 的 27 名患者和 PPG ≥ 20 mmHg 的 101 名患者)后,观察到两组患者的 EVD 存在显著差异(OR = 29.275,95% CI 5.590-153.304,P < 0.001),PPG 较高的一组患者的 EVD 更大。这些研究结果表明,EVD 可作为与 PPG 水平升高相关的不良事件的预测因子。此外,接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,EVD 在诊断 PPG 功能方面的准确度为 0.814(标准误差 0.048,95% CI 0.720-0.908;P <0.001),表明当静脉曲张直径大于 1.1 厘米时,PPG 水平很可能超过 20 mmHg:结论:EVD 与 PPG 呈正相关,可作为评估 PPG 水平的预测指标。这些发现为临床实践中对 PPG 进行无创评估提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between the diameter of esophageal varices measured using a virtual ruler under endoscopy and portal pressure gradient.

Background: Esophageal variceal diameter (EVD) is a crucial factor in determining the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding, which is associated with an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG). However, research into the relationship between EVD and PPG has been limited, primarily because the assessment of EVD depends on visual estimation during endoscopy. Recently, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to accurately detect EVD. In this study, we aim to investigate the correlation between EVD and PPG, with the goal of evaluating EVD as a potential non-invasive indicator of PPG.

Methods: This study included both retrospective and prospective data from 128 patients diagnosed with portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices, gathered from two medical institutions. Clinical data including PPG, biochemical markers, and routine blood tests were collected. In the retrospective phase, EVD was evaluated using an AI-based virtual ruler. In the prospective phase, PPG was measured using radiological intervention methods, and EVD was measured during endoscopy with the aid of AI.

Results: A positive correlation between PPG and EVD was identified (r = 0.521, P < 0.001), which was further supported by multivariate linear regression analysis (b = 6.521, t = 6.872, P < 0.001). When patients were stratified into two groups based on PPG levels (27 patients with PPG < 20 mmHg and 101 patients with PPG ≥ 20 mmHg), a significant difference in EVD was observed between the groups (OR = 29.275, 95% CI 5.590-153.304, P < 0.001), with larger EVD in the higher PPG group. These findings suggest that EVD may serve as a predictor of adverse events associated with elevated PPG levels. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that EVD had an accuracy of 0.814 in diagnosing PPG function (standard error 0.048, 95% CI 0.720-0.908; P < 0.001), indicating that PPG levels are likely to exceed 20 mmHg when the variceal diameter is greater than 1.1 cm.

Conclusion: EVD demonstrated a positive correlation with PPG and could potentially be used as a predictive marker for assessing PPG levels. These findings provide novel insights for the non-invasive evaluation of PPG in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信