年轻人接触电子烟与通风均匀性之间的关系:横断面研究

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-27 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1183/13993003.01675-2024
Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge
{"title":"年轻人接触电子烟与通风均匀性之间的关系:横断面研究","authors":"Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge","doi":"10.1183/13993003.01675-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>), moderate (3-4 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between e-cigarette exposure and ventilation homogeneity in young adults: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.01675-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>), moderate (3-4 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948420/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01675-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01675-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用电子香烟(电子烟)的年轻人越来越多。目前仍不清楚使用电子烟是否会损害肺功能。我们的目的是比较接触过电子烟的年轻人与未接触过电子烟的年轻人之间的通气量分布:研究参与者包括自我报告使用电子烟的健康年轻人(18 至 24 岁),以及没有电子烟、烟草或大麻接触史的参与者。对电子烟暴露的定义有三个衡量标准:1)曾经暴露;2)每天使用;3)吸食频率,包括:无(未暴露)、低(1-2 口/小时)、中(3-4 口/小时)和高(5 口/小时以上)。通气分布采用多次呼吸冲洗试验进行测量,并以肺清除指数(LCI)进行报告:结果:共招募了 93 名参与者,其中 38 名未接触者和 41 名接触者接受了 LCI 测量。暴露组主要包括使用含有尼古丁(93.5%)的调味电子液体的参与者(94.5%)。不同暴露定义的 LCI 差异幅度和方向相似。与未暴露组相比,在未调整模型中,使用过任何电子烟(平均差异为 0.16 个单位;95% CI 为 0.004;0.31)、每天使用(平均差异为 0.11;95% CI 为 0.06;0.28)和大量使用(平均差异为 0.22;95% CI 为 0.03;0.41)的人群的低吸入指数较高:这项初步研究表明,LCI 可能是衡量使用电子烟对通气分布的影响和跟踪小气道早期功能损伤的有用生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between e-cigarette exposure and ventilation homogeneity in young adults: a cross-sectional study.

Background: The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.

Methods: Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h-1), moderate (3-4 puffs·h-1) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h-1). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).

Results: A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).

Conclusion: This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信