Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge
{"title":"年轻人接触电子烟与通风均匀性之间的关系:横断面研究","authors":"Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge","doi":"10.1183/13993003.01675-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>), moderate (3-4 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between e-cigarette exposure and ventilation homogeneity in young adults: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanja Stanojevic, Mei Ha Yung, Berke Sahin, Noah Johnson, Hanna Stewart, Olivier D Laflamme, Geoffrey Maksym, Dimas Mateos-Corral, Mark Asbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.01675-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>), moderate (3-4 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h<sup>-1</sup>). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948420/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01675-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01675-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between e-cigarette exposure and ventilation homogeneity in young adults: a cross-sectional study.
Background: The number of young people who use e-cigarettes is rising. It remains unclear whether e-cigarette use impairs lung function. We aimed to compare ventilation distribution between young adults exposed to e-cigarettes and an unexposed group.
Methods: Study participants included otherwise healthy young adults (18-24 years) who self-reported e-cigarette use and unexposed participants who had no history of e-cigarette, tobacco or cannabis exposure. Exposure to e-cigarettes was defined using three measures: 1) ever-exposed, 2) daily use and 3) puff frequency, which includes none (unexposed), minimal (<2 puffs·h-1), moderate (3-4 puffs·h-1) and heavy (≥5 puffs·h-1). Ventilation distribution was measured using the multiple-breath washout test and reported as lung clearance index (LCI).
Results: A total of 93 participants were recruited; 38 unexposed and 41 exposed participants had LCI measures. The exposed group consisted predominately of participants who used flavoured e-liquids (94.5%) that contained nicotine (93.5%). The magnitude and direction of the difference in LCI across the exposure definitions was similar. Compared with the unexposed group, in the unadjusted models LCI was higher in those with any e-cigarette use (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.004-0.31), daily users (mean difference 0.10, 95% CI -0.08-0.28) and heavy users (mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).
Conclusion: This preliminary work suggests that LCI may be a useful biomarker to measure the effects of e-cigarette use on ventilation distribution and to track early functional impairment of the small airways.
期刊介绍:
The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.