TIDieR-WASH:水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施实施情况报告指南。

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1289/EHP14780
Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman
{"title":"TIDieR-WASH:水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施实施情况报告指南。","authors":"Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman","doi":"10.1289/EHP14780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: <i>a</i>) name, <i>b</i>) theory of change, <i>c</i>) prior evidence, <i>d</i>) location and setting, <i>e</i>) context, <i>f</i>) suitability, <i>g</i>) implementers, <i>h</i>) recipients, <i>i</i>) targeting, <i>j</i>) activities, <i>k</i>) intervention dose, <i>l</i>) fidelity, <i>m</i>) costs, and <i>n</i>) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"132 11","pages":"117006"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIDieR-WASH: A Guideline for Reporting Implementation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP14780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: <i>a</i>) name, <i>b</i>) theory of change, <i>c</i>) prior evidence, <i>d</i>) location and setting, <i>e</i>) context, <i>f</i>) suitability, <i>g</i>) implementers, <i>h</i>) recipients, <i>i</i>) targeting, <i>j</i>) activities, <i>k</i>) intervention dose, <i>l</i>) fidelity, <i>m</i>) costs, and <i>n</i>) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"132 11\",\"pages\":\"117006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:要复制、调整和推广有效的干预措施并解释评估结果,就必须提供有关公共卫生干预措施的背景和实施情况的准确信息。对水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施的背景和实施情况的报告一直不一致且不完整:为了改进对水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施的报告,我们开发了 "水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施描述和复制模板"(TIDieR-WASH)核对表和指南,对原有的 TIDieR 指南进行了改编和扩充。我们对现有的实施报告指南以及目前在讲卫生运动评估中的实施报告进行了一次范围界定审查,以制定一份可纳入该清单的候选项目清单。然后,我们通过国际专家的 4 个阶段的审查来达成共识:最终形成的 14 项清单包括:a) 名称;b) 变化理论;c) 先前证据;d) 地点和环境;e) 背景;f) 适宜性;g) 实施者;h) 受众;i) 目标;j) 活动;k) 干预剂量;l) 真实性;m) 成本;n) 材料。本文报告了定义、解释、示例和使用说明:该清单适用于所有类型的讲卫生运动干预评估,包括直接提供服务、行为改变和系统强化干预。我们特意编写了这份指导文件,以方便从业人员和研究人员使用,并与他们息息相关。采用本清单将有助于为研究和实践透明地报告讲卫生运动的实施情况。与使用 TIDieR 核对表的其他部门一样,清晰的实施报告有助于证据综合、调整和政策指导。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TIDieR-WASH: A Guideline for Reporting Implementation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions.

Introduction: Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.

Methods: To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.

Results: The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: a) name, b) theory of change, c) prior evidence, d) location and setting, e) context, f) suitability, g) implementers, h) recipients, i) targeting, j) activities, k) intervention dose, l) fidelity, m) costs, and n) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.

Discussion: The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信