Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman
{"title":"TIDieR-WASH:水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施实施情况报告指南。","authors":"Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman","doi":"10.1289/EHP14780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: <i>a</i>) name, <i>b</i>) theory of change, <i>c</i>) prior evidence, <i>d</i>) location and setting, <i>e</i>) context, <i>f</i>) suitability, <i>g</i>) implementers, <i>h</i>) recipients, <i>i</i>) targeting, <i>j</i>) activities, <i>k</i>) intervention dose, <i>l</i>) fidelity, <i>m</i>) costs, and <i>n</i>) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"132 11","pages":"117006"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIDieR-WASH: A Guideline for Reporting Implementation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Jonny Crocker, Emily Ogutu, Jedidiah S Snyder, Antoinette Kome, Ben Tidwell, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Jesse Shapiro, Jessy Samuyachi Mahongo, Kelly T Alexander, Michael E Gnilo, Om Prasad Gautam, Sara Hoffman, Sovattha Neou, Matthew C Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP14780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: <i>a</i>) name, <i>b</i>) theory of change, <i>c</i>) prior evidence, <i>d</i>) location and setting, <i>e</i>) context, <i>f</i>) suitability, <i>g</i>) implementers, <i>h</i>) recipients, <i>i</i>) targeting, <i>j</i>) activities, <i>k</i>) intervention dose, <i>l</i>) fidelity, <i>m</i>) costs, and <i>n</i>) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"132 11\",\"pages\":\"117006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
TIDieR-WASH: A Guideline for Reporting Implementation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions.
Introduction: Accurate information on context and implementation of public health interventions is necessary to replicate, adapt, and scale effective interventions and to interpret evaluations. Reporting the context and implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions has been inconsistent and incomplete.
Methods: To improve the reporting of WASH interventions, we developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication for WASH (TIDieR-WASH) checklist and guide, by adapting and expanding the original TIDieR guide. We performed a scoping review of existing implementation reporting guidelines, and of current implementation reporting in WASH evaluations, to develop a list of candidate items to include in this checklist. We then used a 4-stages of review by international experts to reach consensus.
Results: The resulting 14-item checklist comprises: a) name, b) theory of change, c) prior evidence, d) location and setting, e) context, f) suitability, g) implementers, h) recipients, i) targeting, j) activities, k) intervention dose, l) fidelity, m) costs, and n) materials. Definitions, explanations, examples, and instructions for use are reported in this article.
Discussion: The checklist can be applied to all types of evaluations of WASH interventions, including direct service provision, behavior change, and systems strengthening interventions. We deliberately developed this guidance document to be accessible and relevant to practitioners and researchers. Adoption of this checklist will support transparent reporting of WASH implementation for research and practice. As with other sectors that have used TIDieR checklists, clear implementation reporting can assist with evidence synthesis, adaptation, and policy guidance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14780.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.