{"title":"无论日粮蛋白质含量如何,瘤胃保护赖氨酸和蛋氨酸都无法提高阿瓦西晚育母羊的生产性能。","authors":"Mofleh S Awawdeh","doi":"10.5455/javar.2024.k821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study investigated the effects of supplying ruminally protected amino acids (AA) (lysine, L; and methionine, M) and dietary protein levels on the performance of late-nursing ewes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-one Awassi ewes nursing single lambs were individually housed and assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups (2 × 2 factorial design). Ewes in treatment groups were (with supplemental RPL and RPM) or were not (without supplemental RPL and RPM) supplemented with lysine (8.5 gm/day) and methionine (4 gm/day) and were fed diets containing either 13.2 (moderate protein) or 11.1% (low protein) protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No interactions between supplemental AA and dietary protein levels were observed. Supplying ewes with L and M did not affect (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.06) their nutrient intake or their final body weights (BWs). Additionally, milk composition, yield, and efficiency were not affected by supplemental L and M. Decreasing dietary protein levels did not affect (<i>p</i> = 0.13) the final BWs, milk yield, composition, and efficiency but decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) nutrient intake of ewes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under our study conditions, reducing the protein contents of the diets from 13.2% to 11.1% had no negative impact on late-nursing ewes. Regardless of dietary protein level, the beneficial effect of supplying L and M was not evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"711-716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rumen-protected lysine and methionine failed to improve the performance of late-nursing Awassi ewes regardless of dietary protein contents.\",\"authors\":\"Mofleh S Awawdeh\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/javar.2024.k821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study investigated the effects of supplying ruminally protected amino acids (AA) (lysine, L; and methionine, M) and dietary protein levels on the performance of late-nursing ewes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-one Awassi ewes nursing single lambs were individually housed and assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups (2 × 2 factorial design). Ewes in treatment groups were (with supplemental RPL and RPM) or were not (without supplemental RPL and RPM) supplemented with lysine (8.5 gm/day) and methionine (4 gm/day) and were fed diets containing either 13.2 (moderate protein) or 11.1% (low protein) protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No interactions between supplemental AA and dietary protein levels were observed. Supplying ewes with L and M did not affect (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.06) their nutrient intake or their final body weights (BWs). Additionally, milk composition, yield, and efficiency were not affected by supplemental L and M. Decreasing dietary protein levels did not affect (<i>p</i> = 0.13) the final BWs, milk yield, composition, and efficiency but decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01) nutrient intake of ewes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under our study conditions, reducing the protein contents of the diets from 13.2% to 11.1% had no negative impact on late-nursing ewes. Regardless of dietary protein level, the beneficial effect of supplying L and M was not evident.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"711-716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究调查了提供反刍保护氨基酸(AA)(赖氨酸 L 和蛋氨酸 M)和日粮蛋白质水平对哺乳后期母羊生产性能的影响:将 31 只哺育单羔的阿瓦西母羊单独饲养,并随机分配到四个处理组中的一个(2 × 2 因式设计)。处理组中的母羊补充(补充 RPL 和 RPM)或不补充(不补充 RPL 和 RPM)赖氨酸(8.5 克/天)和蛋氨酸(4 克/天),并饲喂含 13.2%(中等蛋白质)或 11.1%(低蛋白质)蛋白质的日粮:未观察到补充 AA 与日粮蛋白质水平之间的相互作用。给母羊补充 L 和 M 不会影响(p ≥ 0.06)其营养摄入量或最终体重(BWs)。此外,补充 L 和 M 不会影响牛奶成分、产量和效率。降低日粮蛋白质水平不会影响(p = 0.13)母羊的最终体重、产奶量、成分和效率,但会降低(p < 0.01)营养摄入量:在我们的研究条件下,将日粮蛋白质含量从 13.2% 降低到 11.1% 对哺乳后期母羊没有负面影响。无论日粮蛋白质水平如何,提供 L 和 M 的有益效果都不明显。
Rumen-protected lysine and methionine failed to improve the performance of late-nursing Awassi ewes regardless of dietary protein contents.
Objective: The current study investigated the effects of supplying ruminally protected amino acids (AA) (lysine, L; and methionine, M) and dietary protein levels on the performance of late-nursing ewes.
Materials and methods: Thirty-one Awassi ewes nursing single lambs were individually housed and assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups (2 × 2 factorial design). Ewes in treatment groups were (with supplemental RPL and RPM) or were not (without supplemental RPL and RPM) supplemented with lysine (8.5 gm/day) and methionine (4 gm/day) and were fed diets containing either 13.2 (moderate protein) or 11.1% (low protein) protein.
Results: No interactions between supplemental AA and dietary protein levels were observed. Supplying ewes with L and M did not affect (p ≥ 0.06) their nutrient intake or their final body weights (BWs). Additionally, milk composition, yield, and efficiency were not affected by supplemental L and M. Decreasing dietary protein levels did not affect (p = 0.13) the final BWs, milk yield, composition, and efficiency but decreased (p < 0.01) nutrient intake of ewes.
Conclusion: Under our study conditions, reducing the protein contents of the diets from 13.2% to 11.1% had no negative impact on late-nursing ewes. Regardless of dietary protein level, the beneficial effect of supplying L and M was not evident.