非侵入性胰腺炎小鼠模型比较研究

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kamatam Swetha, Mylanayakanahosahalli Chandrashekar Indumathi, Shiva Siddappa, Chu-Huang Chen, Gopal K Marathe
{"title":"非侵入性胰腺炎小鼠模型比较研究","authors":"Kamatam Swetha, Mylanayakanahosahalli Chandrashekar Indumathi, Shiva Siddappa, Chu-Huang Chen, Gopal K Marathe","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08771-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Although a relevant animal model is essential for studying human diseases, one has yet to be established for mouse pancreatitis. Early non-invasive models of mouse pancreatitis have serious limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we compared the efficiency, consistency, and reproducibility of inducing pancreatitis in 3 non-invasive mouse models of pancreatitis in Wistar albino mice: (1) L-arginine-induced model (2 intraperitoneal injections of 4 g/kg body weight of L-arginine spaced 1 h apart), (2) caerulein-induced model (6 intraperitoneal injections of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals), and (3) caerulein + LPS (lipopolysaccharide)-induced model (6 intraperitoneal doses of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals, along with an LPS [10 mg/kg body weight] injection immediately after the last caerulein injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed that the L-arginine-induced model was inconsistent. The levels of the pancreatic enzymes, amylase and lipase, were higher in the caerulein and caerulein + LPS groups. Histological examination showed tissue destruction in the induced groups, with varying degrees of fibrosis in the caerulein + LPS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The caerulein + LPS model was the most reliable model in Wistar albino mice. Our findings may be useful in helping investigators choose the most appropriate animal model for pancreatitis research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Non-invasive Mouse Models of Pancreatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Kamatam Swetha, Mylanayakanahosahalli Chandrashekar Indumathi, Shiva Siddappa, Chu-Huang Chen, Gopal K Marathe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08771-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Although a relevant animal model is essential for studying human diseases, one has yet to be established for mouse pancreatitis. Early non-invasive models of mouse pancreatitis have serious limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we compared the efficiency, consistency, and reproducibility of inducing pancreatitis in 3 non-invasive mouse models of pancreatitis in Wistar albino mice: (1) L-arginine-induced model (2 intraperitoneal injections of 4 g/kg body weight of L-arginine spaced 1 h apart), (2) caerulein-induced model (6 intraperitoneal injections of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals), and (3) caerulein + LPS (lipopolysaccharide)-induced model (6 intraperitoneal doses of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals, along with an LPS [10 mg/kg body weight] injection immediately after the last caerulein injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed that the L-arginine-induced model was inconsistent. The levels of the pancreatic enzymes, amylase and lipase, were higher in the caerulein and caerulein + LPS groups. Histological examination showed tissue destruction in the induced groups, with varying degrees of fibrosis in the caerulein + LPS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The caerulein + LPS model was the most reliable model in Wistar albino mice. Our findings may be useful in helping investigators choose the most appropriate animal model for pancreatitis research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08771-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08771-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管相关的动物模型对研究人类疾病至关重要,但小鼠胰腺炎的相关动物模型尚未建立。早期的小鼠胰腺炎非侵入性模型存在严重的局限性:本研究比较了三种非侵入性小鼠胰腺炎模型诱导 Wistar albino 小鼠胰腺炎的效率、一致性和可重复性:(1) L-精氨酸诱导模型(腹腔注射 2 次 4 克/千克体重的 L-精氨酸,每次间隔 1 小时);(2) caerulein 诱导模型(腹腔注射 6 次 50 微克/千克体重的 caerulein,每次间隔 1 小时)、和(3)caerulein + LPS(脂多糖)诱导模型(每小时腹腔注射 6 次 50 微克/千克体重的 caerulein,并在最后一次注射 caerulein 后立即注射 LPS [10 毫克/千克体重])。结果我们的研究结果表明,L-精氨酸诱导的模型并不一致。胰腺酶、淀粉酶和脂肪酶的水平在caerulein组和caerulein + LPS组较高。组织学检查显示,诱导组的组织受到破坏,caerulein + LPS 组出现不同程度的纤维化:Caerulein+LPS模型是Wistar白化小鼠最可靠的模型。我们的研究结果可能有助于研究人员为胰腺炎研究选择最合适的动物模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Non-invasive Mouse Models of Pancreatitis.

Background and aims: Although a relevant animal model is essential for studying human diseases, one has yet to be established for mouse pancreatitis. Early non-invasive models of mouse pancreatitis have serious limitations.

Methods: In this study, we compared the efficiency, consistency, and reproducibility of inducing pancreatitis in 3 non-invasive mouse models of pancreatitis in Wistar albino mice: (1) L-arginine-induced model (2 intraperitoneal injections of 4 g/kg body weight of L-arginine spaced 1 h apart), (2) caerulein-induced model (6 intraperitoneal injections of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals), and (3) caerulein + LPS (lipopolysaccharide)-induced model (6 intraperitoneal doses of 50 µg/kg body weight of caerulein at hourly intervals, along with an LPS [10 mg/kg body weight] injection immediately after the last caerulein injection).

Results: Our findings showed that the L-arginine-induced model was inconsistent. The levels of the pancreatic enzymes, amylase and lipase, were higher in the caerulein and caerulein + LPS groups. Histological examination showed tissue destruction in the induced groups, with varying degrees of fibrosis in the caerulein + LPS group.

Conclusions: The caerulein + LPS model was the most reliable model in Wistar albino mice. Our findings may be useful in helping investigators choose the most appropriate animal model for pancreatitis research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信