规划和实施大西洋东南部森林的生态走廊:挑战与机遇。

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202420230768
João Vitor M Ribeiro, Tatiana Sussel G Mendes, Silvio Jorge C Simões, Isabela Maria Martins, Carolina C Ferreira, Pedro Ivo M Camarinha, Klécia G Massi
{"title":"规划和实施大西洋东南部森林的生态走廊:挑战与机遇。","authors":"João Vitor M Ribeiro, Tatiana Sussel G Mendes, Silvio Jorge C Simões, Isabela Maria Martins, Carolina C Ferreira, Pedro Ivo M Camarinha, Klécia G Massi","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202420230768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Designing ecological corridors studies are much more common than studies that evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of implementation. Thus, this study aimed to identify and discuss factors that can influence the implementation of ecological corridors designed from a multicriteria analysis. For this purpose, the ecological corridor implementation efforts of a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in an Atlantic Forest region were evaluated. The following information about the restoration projects was collected from the NGO database: georeferenced restoration polygons, restoration technique, project size, motivation, and land use tenure characteristics of the restoration site. Restoration polygons were spatially referenced to the planned corridor areas and classified according to land use and land cover, slope, distance to roads and occurrence in Permanent Preservation Areas. The NGO implemented 455.0 hectares of restoration, with only 10.7% within proposed corridors. NGO projects were concentrated on ecological restoration, which presents significant differences between ecological corridors. In practice, the implementation of restoration areas was primarily guided by the local characteristics of the landscape, project's constraints and the will and interest of rural landowners in restoring their properties. This differs from its planning, in which social and economic aspects were not considered and only the environmental variables were taken into.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"96 suppl 3","pages":"e20230768"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning and implementing ecological corridors in the southeast Atlantic Forest: Challenges and opportunities.\",\"authors\":\"João Vitor M Ribeiro, Tatiana Sussel G Mendes, Silvio Jorge C Simões, Isabela Maria Martins, Carolina C Ferreira, Pedro Ivo M Camarinha, Klécia G Massi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0001-3765202420230768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Designing ecological corridors studies are much more common than studies that evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of implementation. Thus, this study aimed to identify and discuss factors that can influence the implementation of ecological corridors designed from a multicriteria analysis. For this purpose, the ecological corridor implementation efforts of a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in an Atlantic Forest region were evaluated. The following information about the restoration projects was collected from the NGO database: georeferenced restoration polygons, restoration technique, project size, motivation, and land use tenure characteristics of the restoration site. Restoration polygons were spatially referenced to the planned corridor areas and classified according to land use and land cover, slope, distance to roads and occurrence in Permanent Preservation Areas. The NGO implemented 455.0 hectares of restoration, with only 10.7% within proposed corridors. NGO projects were concentrated on ecological restoration, which presents significant differences between ecological corridors. In practice, the implementation of restoration areas was primarily guided by the local characteristics of the landscape, project's constraints and the will and interest of rural landowners in restoring their properties. This differs from its planning, in which social and economic aspects were not considered and only the environmental variables were taken into.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias\",\"volume\":\"96 suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"e20230768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计生态走廊的研究要比评估实施效果和实用性的研究更为常见。因此,本研究旨在通过多标准分析,确定并讨论可能影响生态走廊设计实施的因素。为此,本研究评估了一个非政府组织(NGO)在大西洋森林地区实施生态走廊的工作。从非政府组织数据库中收集了以下有关恢复项目的信息:地理坐标定位的恢复多边形、恢复技术、项目规模、动机以及恢复地点的土地使用权特征。修复多边形在空间上参照了规划的走廊区域,并根据土地利用和土地覆盖、坡度、与道路的距离以及是否位于永久保护区进行了分类。非政府组织实施了 455.0 公顷的恢复项目,其中只有 10.7%在拟议的走廊内。非政府组织的项目主要集中在生态恢复方面,不同生态走廊之间的差异很大。在实践中,恢复区域的实施主要受当地景观特点、项目限制以及农村土地所有者恢复其财产的意愿和兴趣的指导。这与规划不同,规划不考虑社会和经济方面,只考虑环境变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning and implementing ecological corridors in the southeast Atlantic Forest: Challenges and opportunities.

Designing ecological corridors studies are much more common than studies that evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of implementation. Thus, this study aimed to identify and discuss factors that can influence the implementation of ecological corridors designed from a multicriteria analysis. For this purpose, the ecological corridor implementation efforts of a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in an Atlantic Forest region were evaluated. The following information about the restoration projects was collected from the NGO database: georeferenced restoration polygons, restoration technique, project size, motivation, and land use tenure characteristics of the restoration site. Restoration polygons were spatially referenced to the planned corridor areas and classified according to land use and land cover, slope, distance to roads and occurrence in Permanent Preservation Areas. The NGO implemented 455.0 hectares of restoration, with only 10.7% within proposed corridors. NGO projects were concentrated on ecological restoration, which presents significant differences between ecological corridors. In practice, the implementation of restoration areas was primarily guided by the local characteristics of the landscape, project's constraints and the will and interest of rural landowners in restoring their properties. This differs from its planning, in which social and economic aspects were not considered and only the environmental variables were taken into.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信