制定一套统一的多发性硬化症诊断标准。

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wallace J Brownlee, Angela Vidal-Jordana, Madiha Shatila, Eva Strijbis, Lisa Schoof, Joep Killestein, Frederik Barkhof, Luca Bollo, Alex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Mar Tintore, Maria A Rocca, Federica Esposito, Matteo Azzimonti, Massimo Filippi, Benedetta Bodini, Andrea Lazzarotto, Bruno Stankoff, Xavier Montalban, Ahmed T Toosy, Alan J Thompson, Olga Ciccarelli
{"title":"制定一套统一的多发性硬化症诊断标准。","authors":"Wallace J Brownlee, Angela Vidal-Jordana, Madiha Shatila, Eva Strijbis, Lisa Schoof, Joep Killestein, Frederik Barkhof, Luca Bollo, Alex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Mar Tintore, Maria A Rocca, Federica Esposito, Matteo Azzimonti, Massimo Filippi, Benedetta Bodini, Andrea Lazzarotto, Bruno Stankoff, Xavier Montalban, Ahmed T Toosy, Alan J Thompson, Olga Ciccarelli","doi":"10.1002/ana.27145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2017 McDonald criteria continued the separation of diagnostic criteria for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) for historical, rather than biological, reasons. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria when applied to patients with suspected PPMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients evaluated for suspected PPMS at 5 European centers. The 2017 McDonald PPMS criteria was the gold standard against which the 2017 McDonald RRMS dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time criteria were evaluated. We also investigated modified RRMS DIS criteria, including: (i) optic nerve lesions; (ii) ≥2 spinal cord lesions; and (iii) higher fulfilment of DIS criteria alone (lesions in ≥3 regions) without dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid, for a diagnosis of PPMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 patients were diagnosed with PPMS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, and 40 with alternate disorders. The 2017 McDonald RRMS DIS criteria and the modified DIS criteria including the optic nerve or ≥2 spinal cord lesions performed well in PPMS diagnosis when combined with dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid (sensitivity 92.9-95.4%, specificity 95%, accuracy 93.2-95.3%). A diagnosis of PPMS based on high fulfillment of modified RRMS DIS criteria had high specificity, but low sensitivity. A diagnostic algorithm applicable to patients evaluated for suspected MS is proposed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The 2017 McDonald RRMS criteria and modifications to DIS criteria, currently under consideration, performed well in PPMS diagnosis. Forthcoming revisions to the McDonald criteria should consider a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria for MS. ANN NEUROL 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Unified Set of Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Wallace J Brownlee, Angela Vidal-Jordana, Madiha Shatila, Eva Strijbis, Lisa Schoof, Joep Killestein, Frederik Barkhof, Luca Bollo, Alex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Mar Tintore, Maria A Rocca, Federica Esposito, Matteo Azzimonti, Massimo Filippi, Benedetta Bodini, Andrea Lazzarotto, Bruno Stankoff, Xavier Montalban, Ahmed T Toosy, Alan J Thompson, Olga Ciccarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.27145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2017 McDonald criteria continued the separation of diagnostic criteria for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) for historical, rather than biological, reasons. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria when applied to patients with suspected PPMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients evaluated for suspected PPMS at 5 European centers. The 2017 McDonald PPMS criteria was the gold standard against which the 2017 McDonald RRMS dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time criteria were evaluated. We also investigated modified RRMS DIS criteria, including: (i) optic nerve lesions; (ii) ≥2 spinal cord lesions; and (iii) higher fulfilment of DIS criteria alone (lesions in ≥3 regions) without dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid, for a diagnosis of PPMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 patients were diagnosed with PPMS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, and 40 with alternate disorders. The 2017 McDonald RRMS DIS criteria and the modified DIS criteria including the optic nerve or ≥2 spinal cord lesions performed well in PPMS diagnosis when combined with dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid (sensitivity 92.9-95.4%, specificity 95%, accuracy 93.2-95.3%). A diagnosis of PPMS based on high fulfillment of modified RRMS DIS criteria had high specificity, but low sensitivity. A diagnostic algorithm applicable to patients evaluated for suspected MS is proposed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The 2017 McDonald RRMS criteria and modifications to DIS criteria, currently under consideration, performed well in PPMS diagnosis. Forthcoming revisions to the McDonald criteria should consider a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria for MS. ANN NEUROL 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27145\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2017年麦克唐纳标准继续将复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)和原发性进展型多发性硬化症(PPMS)的诊断标准分开,这是出于历史原因而非生物学原因。我们旨在探索一套统一的诊断标准应用于疑似 PPMS 患者的可行性:我们回顾性地确定了在欧洲 5 个中心接受评估的疑似 PPMS 患者。以2017年麦克唐纳PPMS标准为金标准,评估2017年麦克唐纳RRMS空间传播(DIS)和时间传播标准。我们还研究了修改后的RRMS DIS标准,包括:(i)视神经病变;(ii)脊髓病变≥2个;(iii)仅符合DIS标准(病变≥3个区域)而无时间上的播散/脑脊液阳性,即可诊断为PPMS:采用2017年麦克唐纳标准,共有282名患者被诊断为PPMS,40名患者被诊断为其他疾病。2017 McDonald RRMS DIS标准和包括视神经或≥2处脊髓病变的改良DIS标准在结合时间/脑脊液阳性播散诊断PPMS时表现良好(敏感性92.9%-95.4%,特异性95%,准确性93.2%-95.3%)。基于高度符合改良 RRMS DIS 标准的 PPMS 诊断具有较高的特异性,但敏感性较低。本文提出了一种适用于疑似多发性硬化症患者的诊断算法:2017年麦克唐纳RRMS标准和目前正在审议的DIS标准修订版在PPMS诊断中表现良好。即将对麦克唐纳标准进行的修订应考虑采用一套统一的多发性硬化症诊断标准。ann neurol 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Unified Set of Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis.

Objective: The 2017 McDonald criteria continued the separation of diagnostic criteria for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) for historical, rather than biological, reasons. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria when applied to patients with suspected PPMS.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients evaluated for suspected PPMS at 5 European centers. The 2017 McDonald PPMS criteria was the gold standard against which the 2017 McDonald RRMS dissemination in space (DIS) and dissemination in time criteria were evaluated. We also investigated modified RRMS DIS criteria, including: (i) optic nerve lesions; (ii) ≥2 spinal cord lesions; and (iii) higher fulfilment of DIS criteria alone (lesions in ≥3 regions) without dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid, for a diagnosis of PPMS.

Results: A total of 282 patients were diagnosed with PPMS using the 2017 McDonald criteria, and 40 with alternate disorders. The 2017 McDonald RRMS DIS criteria and the modified DIS criteria including the optic nerve or ≥2 spinal cord lesions performed well in PPMS diagnosis when combined with dissemination in time/positive cerebrospinal fluid (sensitivity 92.9-95.4%, specificity 95%, accuracy 93.2-95.3%). A diagnosis of PPMS based on high fulfillment of modified RRMS DIS criteria had high specificity, but low sensitivity. A diagnostic algorithm applicable to patients evaluated for suspected MS is proposed.

Interpretation: The 2017 McDonald RRMS criteria and modifications to DIS criteria, currently under consideration, performed well in PPMS diagnosis. Forthcoming revisions to the McDonald criteria should consider a single, unified set of diagnostic criteria for MS. ANN NEUROL 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信