在售后服务中采用增材制造技术:制定纠正、预防和预期方法类型学

IF 11.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Robin Kabelitz-Bock, Kai Hoberg, Johannes Meuer
{"title":"在售后服务中采用增材制造技术:制定纠正、预防和预期方法类型学","authors":"Robin Kabelitz-Bock,&nbsp;Kai Hoberg,&nbsp;Johannes Meuer","doi":"10.1111/jbl.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Manufacturing firms face complex after-sales challenges, including spare part shortages. While additive manufacturing (AM) offers a solution by minimizing costs and complexity, not all firms adopt AM equally, and research on differences in AM adoption in the context of spare part shortages is surprisingly scarce. To close this knowledge gap, we apply the <i>awareness-motivation-capability</i> (AMC) perspective. Our comparative case study of AM applications in 17 firms identifies three approaches how firms adopt AM—the corrective, preventive, and anticipatory approach. We find that the specific configuration of contextual factors related to a spare part shortage determines the approach firms follow. Using the AMC perspective, we discover and explain why firms differ in adopting AM despite suitable spare part characteristics and similar contexts. Through uniquely analyzing spare part shortages, our study contributes to AM research by challenging the assumption that economic justification is the sole driver of AM adoption and instead revealing that it is a context-dependent process, with <i>awareness</i> and <i>motivation</i> serving as critical yet underexplored antecedents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adopting Additive Manufacturing in After-Sales: Developing a Typology of Corrective, Preventive, and Anticipatory Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Robin Kabelitz-Bock,&nbsp;Kai Hoberg,&nbsp;Johannes Meuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbl.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Manufacturing firms face complex after-sales challenges, including spare part shortages. While additive manufacturing (AM) offers a solution by minimizing costs and complexity, not all firms adopt AM equally, and research on differences in AM adoption in the context of spare part shortages is surprisingly scarce. To close this knowledge gap, we apply the <i>awareness-motivation-capability</i> (AMC) perspective. Our comparative case study of AM applications in 17 firms identifies three approaches how firms adopt AM—the corrective, preventive, and anticipatory approach. We find that the specific configuration of contextual factors related to a spare part shortage determines the approach firms follow. Using the AMC perspective, we discover and explain why firms differ in adopting AM despite suitable spare part characteristics and similar contexts. Through uniquely analyzing spare part shortages, our study contributes to AM research by challenging the assumption that economic justification is the sole driver of AM adoption and instead revealing that it is a context-dependent process, with <i>awareness</i> and <i>motivation</i> serving as critical yet underexplored antecedents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.70000\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制造企业面临着复杂的售后挑战,包括备件短缺。虽然快速成型制造(AM)可以最大限度地降低成本和复杂性,从而提供一种解决方案,但并非所有企业都同样采用快速成型制造,而且有关备件短缺情况下采用快速成型制造的差异的研究少得令人吃惊。为了填补这一知识空白,我们采用了意识-动机-能力(AMC)视角。我们对 17 家企业的 AM 应用进行了比较案例研究,确定了企业采用 AM 的三种方法--纠正性、预防性和预期性方法。我们发现,与备件短缺相关的环境因素的具体配置决定了企业所采用的方法。利用 AMC 的视角,我们发现并解释了为什么尽管备件特征相同、背景相似,但企业在采用 AM 方面却存在差异。通过对备件短缺的独特分析,我们的研究挑战了经济理由是采用 AM 的唯一驱动力这一假设,并揭示了这是一个依赖于情境的过程,而意识和动机是关键的前因,但却未得到充分探索,从而为 AM 研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adopting Additive Manufacturing in After-Sales: Developing a Typology of Corrective, Preventive, and Anticipatory Approaches

Adopting Additive Manufacturing in After-Sales: Developing a Typology of Corrective, Preventive, and Anticipatory Approaches

Manufacturing firms face complex after-sales challenges, including spare part shortages. While additive manufacturing (AM) offers a solution by minimizing costs and complexity, not all firms adopt AM equally, and research on differences in AM adoption in the context of spare part shortages is surprisingly scarce. To close this knowledge gap, we apply the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) perspective. Our comparative case study of AM applications in 17 firms identifies three approaches how firms adopt AM—the corrective, preventive, and anticipatory approach. We find that the specific configuration of contextual factors related to a spare part shortage determines the approach firms follow. Using the AMC perspective, we discover and explain why firms differ in adopting AM despite suitable spare part characteristics and similar contexts. Through uniquely analyzing spare part shortages, our study contributes to AM research by challenging the assumption that economic justification is the sole driver of AM adoption and instead revealing that it is a context-dependent process, with awareness and motivation serving as critical yet underexplored antecedents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信