揭示传统火花和冷光烟花的成分和热危险特性

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jia-Chi Ye, Shin-Mei Ouyang, Wei-Chun Chen
{"title":"揭示传统火花和冷光烟花的成分和热危险特性","authors":"Jia-Chi Ye,&nbsp;Shin-Mei Ouyang,&nbsp;Wei-Chun Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13678-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Taiwan’s pyrotechnics regulations cover nine categories, ranking spark-type fireworks as the third most substantial group. These fireworks, which are broadly used in festivals and public events, include professional stage pyrotechnics (cold light fireworks) and normal spark light fireworks, which share a similar discharge pattern. The difference lies in the temperature they generate when burning and the temperature required for ignition. Cold light fireworks generate an average of 201.49 °C, whereas normal spark light fireworks reach 503.38 °C. This temperature disparity results from the composition differences, with cold light fireworks containing nitrocellulose, which has higher energy and nitrating properties. Their average enthalpy (Δ<i>H</i><sub>d</sub>) is 2389.64 J g<sup>‒1</sup>, compared to 567.42 J g<sup>‒1</sup> for normal spark light fireworks, raising safety concerns. The study used commercially available fireworks, minimising sample contamination by excluding certain fixtures. Thermal parameters and apparent activation energy were used by simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis and the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa, Friedman, and ASTM E698 thermokinetic analysis revealed that the temperature of sparks of cold light fireworks appears harmless to the human body on the surface. The lower apparent activation energy and higher heat release show their potential harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"149 22","pages":"12917 - 12928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing the components and thermal hazard characteristics of traditional spark and cold light fireworks\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Chi Ye,&nbsp;Shin-Mei Ouyang,&nbsp;Wei-Chun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10973-024-13678-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Taiwan’s pyrotechnics regulations cover nine categories, ranking spark-type fireworks as the third most substantial group. These fireworks, which are broadly used in festivals and public events, include professional stage pyrotechnics (cold light fireworks) and normal spark light fireworks, which share a similar discharge pattern. The difference lies in the temperature they generate when burning and the temperature required for ignition. Cold light fireworks generate an average of 201.49 °C, whereas normal spark light fireworks reach 503.38 °C. This temperature disparity results from the composition differences, with cold light fireworks containing nitrocellulose, which has higher energy and nitrating properties. Their average enthalpy (Δ<i>H</i><sub>d</sub>) is 2389.64 J g<sup>‒1</sup>, compared to 567.42 J g<sup>‒1</sup> for normal spark light fireworks, raising safety concerns. The study used commercially available fireworks, minimising sample contamination by excluding certain fixtures. Thermal parameters and apparent activation energy were used by simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis and the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa, Friedman, and ASTM E698 thermokinetic analysis revealed that the temperature of sparks of cold light fireworks appears harmless to the human body on the surface. The lower apparent activation energy and higher heat release show their potential harm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"volume\":\"149 22\",\"pages\":\"12917 - 12928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13678-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13678-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

台湾的烟火法规涵盖九大类,火花类烟火排在第三位。这些烟花广泛用于节日和公共活动,包括专业舞台烟花(冷光烟花)和普通火花烟花,它们的燃放模式相似。它们的区别在于燃烧时产生的温度和点燃所需的温度。冷光烟花产生的平均温度为 201.49 °C,而普通火花烟花则达到 503.38 °C。这种温度差异源于成分的不同,冷光烟花含有硝化纤维,而硝化纤维具有更高的能量和硝化特性。冷光烟花的平均热焓(ΔHd)为 2389.64 焦耳 g-1,而普通火花烟花的平均热焓(ΔHd)为 567.42 焦耳 g-1,这引起了人们对安全问题的关注。这项研究使用的是市售烟花,通过排除某些固定装置来尽量减少样品污染。热参数和表观活化能通过同步热重分析和 Flynn-Wall-Ozawa、Friedman 和 ASTM E698 热动力学分析得出,冷光烟花的火花温度表面看来对人体无害。较低的表观活化能和较高的热释放显示了其潜在的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing the components and thermal hazard characteristics of traditional spark and cold light fireworks

Taiwan’s pyrotechnics regulations cover nine categories, ranking spark-type fireworks as the third most substantial group. These fireworks, which are broadly used in festivals and public events, include professional stage pyrotechnics (cold light fireworks) and normal spark light fireworks, which share a similar discharge pattern. The difference lies in the temperature they generate when burning and the temperature required for ignition. Cold light fireworks generate an average of 201.49 °C, whereas normal spark light fireworks reach 503.38 °C. This temperature disparity results from the composition differences, with cold light fireworks containing nitrocellulose, which has higher energy and nitrating properties. Their average enthalpy (ΔHd) is 2389.64 J g‒1, compared to 567.42 J g‒1 for normal spark light fireworks, raising safety concerns. The study used commercially available fireworks, minimising sample contamination by excluding certain fixtures. Thermal parameters and apparent activation energy were used by simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis and the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa, Friedman, and ASTM E698 thermokinetic analysis revealed that the temperature of sparks of cold light fireworks appears harmless to the human body on the surface. The lower apparent activation energy and higher heat release show their potential harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信